From The International Jew to The Israel Lobby

Inciting to Pogroms, Ghettoization and Final Solution

“Your father is the devil and you desire to do what gives him pleasure. He always was a murderer and standeth not in truth because truth is not in him. When he says what is false, he does what is natural to him, for he is a liar and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe not.” John 8:44

This verse inspired Martin Luther's extremely anti-Semitic book titled The Jews and Their Lies in 1543. In this book he accused Jews of being liars and thieves and blamed just about every bad thing in the world on “the Jews”. He also requested in this book that the Catholic Church cast the Jews out of Europe, and it was the Church's failure to comply with this request, among others, that convinced Martin Luther to break with the Catholic Church. Five centuries later a German Member of Parliament added in his anti-Semitic rant the feature that M. Luther omitted from St. John's charges. He called Jews a Taetervolk, a nation of murderers. Like their God in Jesus' rant.

Within the Parameters of Jesus' Blasphemy

On the anniversary of the unification of East and West Germans October 3, 2003 a German MP Martin Hohmann has caused a storm of protest by linking Jews to execution squads in the Russian Revolution. He compared the killings which he said were orchestrated by Jews in Russia's violent 1917 revolution, with the murder of Europe's Jews during the Holocaust of WWII. Mr. Hohmann said: “Jews were active in great numbers in the leadership as well as in the Cheka firing squads.

The news about the event was broadcast by BBC News service on Oct. 31, 2003. On November 15, 2003 Richard Bernstein in his article German Legislator Is Ousted for Slur on Jews for The New York Times commented on the event as follows: “Mr. Hohmann's words were seen by many people here as particularly reprehensible, because in likening Jews as a whole to Bolsheviks he was reiterating one of the most common calumnies used by the Nazis to stir up hatred against Jews. This point was quickly made by German newspapers, many of which have been calling on the Christian Democratic leadership to expel Mr. Hohmann from the party.

Mr. R. Bernstein ignored a very important chapter of the American history which, to a certain degree, anticipated, and ideologically, prepared the rise of the German Nazism and eventually even helped it to take control of that country. This chapter involves the political activity of the industrial magnate Henry Ford whose book The Internationl Jew inspired many passages of A. Hitler's Mein Kampf. Similarly, the chapter of Ford's book entitled The Scope of Jewish Dictatorship in the United States inspired the ill-famous The Israel Lobby by two Ivy League scholars. Even worse, Ford's propaganda of hate was reinforced and and legalized by two official publications of the British and US governments.

Seymour Hersh in his interview (The President Has Accepted Ethnic Cleansing) for SpiegelOnline of Sept. 28, 2007 said: “We have this wonderful capacity to Hitlerize people. We had Hitler, and since then we had about 20 of them. Khrushchev and Mao and, of course, Stalin, and for a little while Gadhafi was our Hitler. And now we have this guy Ahmadinejad. The reality is, he is not nearly as powerful inside the country as we like to think he is.”

One of them was published as a British White Paper in April, 1919 and was entitled: Russia, No. 1 (1919), A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia. The kernel of the Paper is contained in the following extract from Mr. Oudendyke’s Report forwarded to London by Mr. Oudendyke, the representative of the Netherlands Government at St. Petersburg.“Bolshevism.is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things. The only manner in which this danger can be averted would be collective action on the part of all the Powers.” The foreword to the White Paper stated that it was issued in accordance with a decision of the English War Cabinet in January (1919). It was a British Declaration of War on Jewish people.

The second publication, treating of the financing of the Russian Revolution by the Jewish Bank of Kuhn, Loeb and Company, was the one drawn by the American Intelligence Service and transmitted by the French High Commissioner to his government. This document was published by the Documentation Catholique of Paris on 6th March, 1920, and was preceded by the following remarks: “The authenticity of this document is guaranteed to us. With regard to the exactness of the information it contain, the American State Department must assume responsibility.” This document was quoted in 1920 in a supplement to the paper La Vieille France (The Old France) which added: “All the governments of the Entente were aware of this memorandum, drawn from the data of the American Intelligence Service and sent at the time to the French High Commissioner and his colleagues.”

Roosevelt's close friend Henry Adams took another approach: “Everybody is interested, and excited, and all are anti-Russian, almost to a dangerous extent (Adams wrote privately in 1904 as the Russian-Japanese war erupted). I am the only – relative – Russian afloat, and only because I am half-crazy with the fear that Russia is sailing straight into another French Revolution which may upset all Europe and us too. A serious disaster to Russia might smash the whole civilized world.”

Some Americans stepped forward to help replenish Japan's resources. They were led by leading Jewish investment bankers in New York who had witnessed, or personally endured, the atrocities committed by Russians agains Jews, esp. between the early 1880, and the Kishiniev Massacre in 1903. After the already-strapped Japanese treasury failed to float large loans in London and New York during April 1904, Jacob Schiff, the powerful head of the Kuhn, Loeb investment bank, took charge. He worked with his friend, Lord Rothschild of the great European banking house, to block Russian loans in London and paris. In all, Schiff helped Japan sell American four bond issues that totaled nearly $350 million, or almost half the cost of the entire war for Tokyo. These loans marked the birth of Wall Street as a force in international diplomacy.

Early in 1920 H.Ford made his anti-Semitic views known for the first time in an interview with J.J.O'Neil of the New York World. Ford proclaimed that The international financiers are behind all wars. They are what is called The International Jew- German Jews, French Jews, English Jews, American Jews. I believe that in all these countries except our own the Jewish financier is supreme...Here the Jew is a threat.

On May 22, 1920 the front page of Ford's newspaper carried the headline: The International Jew: The World's Problem. It was the first in a series of articles which were to last for 91 consecutive issues. The author of these articles a certain William J. Cameron found a source for his anti-Jewish articles in the form of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. The original forgery entitled The Great in the Small was designed to deflect the misery of czar Nicholas II's policies onto a scapegoat – the Jews of Russia. This was was, in turn, further elaborated on in 1917 by a group of czarist officers living in Berlin and re-titled The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

No doubt this propaganda was inspired by a certain Boris Brasol, a young tsarist who had been a leading Black Hundred figure and for a time was on the payroll of Henry Ford. His first filing for the Dearborn Independent was The Bolshevik Menace to Russia,published in April 1919. It was he who translated the Protocols into English and brought them to Ford's attention. In 1918 he worked as an operative for US Army Military Intelligence, and in the 1930 became a Nazi agent.

Ford's personal secretary and general manager of The Dearborn Indeependent, Ernest G. Liebold set up a special detective agency for Ford at 20 Broad St., New York City, which was designed to investigate the private lives of prominent and suspected Jews. Some of the detectives employed were former Secret Service agents. Others were quite prominent in government affairs, such as C.C. Daniels, brother of the former Secretary of the Navy, and Dr. Harris Houghton, former head of New York City's Army Intelligence – Gathering Bureau.

Echoing this racist, anti-Semiting propaganda, Father Kruszynski, a professor of the Lublin University in 1920 explained that “racial purity created what is called an anthropological type.” Three years later, Kruszynski would write: “If the world is to be rid of the Jewish scourge, it would be necessary to exterminate them, down to the last one.” Lest such views be thought to be regarded as less than respectable among the Catholic hierarchy in Poland of the time, it is worth recalling that two years later, in 1925, Kuszynski was named head of the Catholic University of Lublin.

Ford's impact on Hitler was evidenced by a framed photograph of the industrialist that hung on Hitler's office wall. Tens of thousands of copies of Ford's anti-Semitic tracts were circulated in Germany in 1921-22, just as Hitler was gaining control of the Nazi Party. Mein Kampf contains sections that appear to be lifted from the Dearborn Independent.

Interestingly. in Pest in Russland (Munich, 1922) Rosenberg also claimed that the New York Jewish banking house of Loeb, Kuhn & Company had financed the communist revolution in Russia in 1917, but Rosenberg drew heavily on the writings of a white Russian anti-communist, General Fyodor Viktorovich Vinberg, whose Berlin Letters (1919) had first advanced the thesis. The communists had been successful because communism was a form of Judaism and had been financed by the Jews. The ignorance of the Russian anti-Semites is proverbial, but Gen. Vinberg knew well the people whom he was trying to bait.

On 12 Oct. 1922, discussing the “worldwide revolution and the Jews,” an anonymous writer drew up for La Civilta Cattolica the following clinical balance sheet of this period: “The world is sick (…) Everywhere peoples are in the grip of inexplicable convulsions (…) and the filthy element, as uninterested in work as it is avid for money and unattainable pleasures, seems to be amusing itself in a frenetic and tragic dance of tumults and strikes, waiting to proclaim the communist republic tomorrow, while the politicians, the wise men of the nations, frightened, frantically search for a peace that is no more than a perpetual disillusion. Where are we going? (…) Who is leading? (…) Who is urging on this rabble of parties, leagues, and lodges, and guides this movement of universal revolution which is turning human society’s head from one end of the world to the other?” (…) Who? The Synagogue, the author answers, after having “demonstrated” that in Russia, the source of world subversion, and in the communist International, all the levers of power were in the hands of “Jewish intruders.”

A. Homer’s article which appeared in the issues of The Catholic Herald (Oct.-Nov. 1933) was a Catholic salvo expressing joy over taking power by Hitler. The article was reprinted in pamphlet to demonstrate the relation between Judaism and Bolshevism and Zionism. From the pamphlet itself we learn: “The Soviet movement was a Jewish, and not a Russian conception. It was forced on Russia from without, when in 1917, German and German-American -Jewish interests sent Lenin and his associates into Russia, furnished with the wherewithal to bring about the defection of the Russian armies.”

The International Jew vs. Bolshevism

An unending stream of vile propaganda was disseminated around the world, courtesy of the Ford fortune. Between 1920 and 1922 Ford reprinted his articles in four brochures and a more comprehensive book, The International Jew, which was translated into most European languages and widely circulated.

Ford's life had a logic. He lived through a convulsive and critical period of great social, political and technological change, and these events passed through him. Taken apart from these titanic movements, Ford appears as an eccentric maverick, a somewhat solitary figure. Despite the fact that, on the whole, American politicians and corporate leaders rejected Ford's violently and overtly anti-Semitic program, his views were a component element in the bitter reaction of the American and world bourgeoisie to the rising threat of socialism.

David North in his pamphlet Antisemitism, Fascism and the Holocaust places the development of modern anti-Semitism in its true political context: “Political Antisemitism was not confined to Germany...Antisemitism was seen by its proponents as the most effective means of mobilizing mass support against not only the emerging socialist proletariat, but all elements of liberal democracy as well. On the basis of Antisemitism, a new national (and later international) consensus was to be forged, transcending the class division that had been created by the process of capitalist industrialization and upon which the appeal of socialism was based.”

Antisemitism has had a very specific content since the spread of industrial capitalism in the late 19th century. It was used to divide the working class, like all forms of racism. But additionally, it was honed as a specific weapon against the socialist aspirations of the working class. Antisemitism and racism, alongside the age-old ploy of Roman Catholicism, have provided an indispensable ideological bulwark against scientific socialism.

Henry Ford and German Nazism were but a continuation of the ideology of Russian Black Hundreds who were reactionary, anti-Semitic groups formed in Russia during and the 1905 Revolution. Sponsored by the tsarist regime, they were composed largely of landowners, police, clergy and rich peasants, and conducted raids against revolutionaries and pogroms against Jews.

At the most decisive level, Ford's Antisemitism became an integral part of the reaction of a section of the American bourgeoisie to the Russian Revolution and the rise of the labor movement both at home and abroad. Even prior to Hitler, Ford made the stereotypical amalgam between the Jews, the Russian Revolution and the labor movement. In the Independent Dearborn, the Soviet Union was referred to as “the present Jewish government of Russia.

Throughout his life, Ford encouraged the circulation and reprinting of his attacks on Jews. Ernest Liebold, Ford's second-in-command, was a life-long and bitter anti-Semite. He was the spark plug in the Jewish series and was anti-Semitic in terms of wanting to eradicated the Jews.

William J. Cameron was brought on board the Dearborn Independent to write the International Jew series. He went on to found the Anglo-Saxon Federation of America, an anti-Semitic Christian Identity movement.

This Anglo-Israelite or British-Israelite movement believed that the Anglo-Saxon race were lineally descended from the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel, and they were God's chosen people, not the tribe of “treacherous” Judah. It was Anglo-Saxon who were descended by the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel; and Great Britain and the US were the true Holy Land. They believed the inferior, usurper Jews claim no rightful place in God's inheritance. This anti-Semitic pseudo-theology matches exactly the so-called REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY i.e. the “belief or opinion” that Israel, having failed YHWH, has been replaced by the Gentile Church. The Church is now seen as an “spiritual Israel” (a term not in the Bible). This theology claims that all the promises and blessings, in fact, Israel’s entire inheritance, now belongs to the Church. Israel, however, gets to keep the curses and the Law. Replacement Theology was first established at the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE, but the Idea was preached as early as the late first century CE by some of the “Church fathers.”

At Angloisrael.com you can find a picture of President Eisenhower with Christian Identity movement's minister William N. Hollis (1959) and another one of President Nixon with the same minister (1960). The new British anti-Semitism tied to this pseudo-theology denies the legitimacy of the State of Israel.

The above mentioned Cameron, the author of The International Jew became the first president of the Anglo-Saxon Federation of America and published the anti-Semitic Destiny magazine, which recycled many of the accusations of the Dearborn Independent. The Anglo-Saxons believed that they were the “true” sons of Israel. Hieroglyphics on the Great Pyramid in Egypt supposedly proclaimed that the lost 10 tribes of Israel had wandered all over Europe and eventually settled in what became the Anglo-Saxon countries – namely The British Isles. It was their belief that Jesus was not a Jew, but an Anglo-Saxon-Celtic-Israeli. In addition to Destiny and The Protocols, the Anglo-Saxons published pamphlets addressing “The Jewish Question.” In the meantime, Cameron still maintained full employment at the Ford Company as its chief spokesman and commentator for the Ford Sunday Evening Hour radio show.

In 1927 Ford issued a phony “apology” to Jews, mainly due to a sales slump and the need to launch the Model A without a cloud of scandal over his business. The Dearborn Independent, with no other reason to exist, closed at the end of the year. His publications, however, continued to be published throughout the world, and continue to be circulated to this day (http://abbc.com/ford/intro.htm). I am convinced that Mr. Hohmann's library is stuffed with them.

On his seventy-fifth birthday, Ford received a special honor from Hitler, the Grand Service Cross of the Supreme Order of the German Eagle. The honor was bestowed on Ford on July 30, 1938 – four months after the Anschluss and the mass terror against Viennese Jews – at a birthday dinner attended by more than 1,500 prominent Detroiters. This was the highest honor of the Reich that could b bestowed on a foreign national, and the German consul traveled to Detroit to personally drape the golden cross with swastika over Ford's chest.

Leading pro-Nazi Americans of the 1930s, Father Coughlin and Gerald K. Smith, were also associates and there are widely held suspicions that they received financial contributions from Ford, Charles Lindbergh and family were close friends.

The Nazi slogan was Juda Verrecke, “perish Judah.” The full meaning of Juda Verrecke is lost in English translation. It is akin to perishing like a “lice-ridden cur.” Nazi leaders, among them Joseph Goebbels, Julius Streicher, and Hans Frank, frequently described Jews as vermin in need of extermination. In 1929 Goebbels wrote: “Certainly the Jew is a human being. But then the flea is a living thing too – only not a pleasant one. Since the flea is not a pleasant thing, we are not obliged to keep it and let it prosper…but our duty is rather to exterminate it. Likewise with the Jews. In an article in the Vőlkischer Beobachter in 1921 Hitler described the Jews as “lice and bugs sucking the German people’s blood out of its veins.”
Hitler’s Anschluss was foreshadowed by 3 articles on the Jewish Question published in May 1937 in La Civilta Cattolica. In the first article the anonymous writer asserts that, Judaism is a foreign body. “There are only two possible solutions; elimination or segregation. Elimination can be achieved in three ways: in a clearly hostile manner, through destruction; in a hostile but less cruel manner, through expulsion…”

The Christian Foundations of Bolshevism

René Fülőp-Miller in his book Geist und Gesicht des Bolschewismus (Amalthea-Verlag, Zűrich-Leipzig-Vienna. 1926) saw differently the sources of inspiration for Bolshevik revolution. “Dostoevski,” he wrote, “grasped and developed the identity between the peculiar variety of socialism long cherished and the idea of the Jesuits. Berdaiev has shown in an excellent analysis of Dostoevski’s Weltanschauung, that this writer found in the nihilistic and terrorist socialism of his time an idea which was identical with that at the root of the Catholic inquisition. He regarded the communist state established by force as nothing but the logical consequence and ultimate emanation of medieval Catholicism. Lenin liked to use proverbs and easy images, especially from the Gospels and Krylov’s fables.

In the Legend of the Grand Inquisitor Dostoevski, in Berdayev’s view, had socialism rather than Catholicism in mind: “The rule of the papist theocracy with its dangerous errors belongs wholly to the past. He coming kingdom of the Grand Inquisitor is allied not so much with Catholicism as with atheistic and materialistic socialism.”

The notebooks found among Dostoevski’s papers after his death confirm in every respect the view that the novelist saw a spiritual identity between Jesuitism and the Russian socialism of the time, the archetype of the Bolshevism of today. In both schools he saw the same “Spirit of liberation by despotism, and of making mankind happy by force.”

“To whom the end is permitted,” says the Jesuit Hermann Busembaum (1653) “to him is the means also permitted.” “In all cases,” writes the Jesuit Etienne Bauny (1653), “man can be ill disposed to his neighbor without sin, if he is moved thereto entirely for a good end.”

Johannes de Dicastilo, in his work De justitie et iure (1641) draws the final conclusion by declaring that, in his judgment “if a father is injurious to the State and the commonweal, and there is no other way of averting this evil, he would permit the son to slay his outlawed father.” The Bolsheviks built up a monument to a boy who betrayed his father who had stolen some food for him when they were starving during the revolutionary period.

The denial of freedom of conscience is also entirely Jesuitical; for Jesuitism worked out a doctrine of “probabilism”, according to which a man may peacefully follow the view of recognized authority without any regard to his own moral judgment. The Jesuitical doctrine is behind the official forgiveness of Hitler’s crimes in Solidarity’s Poland. The agreement between the morality of the Bolsheviks and that of the Jesuits is also very clearly shown by the fact that the forerunner of the Bolsheviks in Russia were not really a product of Marxism o much as of the confused nihilistic ideas of Bakunin, Nechaev, and others. They, however, repeatedly and quite openly avowed their leanings to Jesuitism. Bakunin, in particular, the real father of Bolshevism, the spiritual pioneer of this Jesuitical socialism, declared: “Poison, the dagger, the rope, and other murderous tools,” may, under certain conditions, “be justified by revolutionary thought.”

And at last but not the least, Lenin (assumed name of Ulyanov) has a strong Catholic connotation. Most likely, it is a Russian rendering of the name of German town Lehnin located not far from Potsdam. In the German religious tradition there was widely known the so-called Lehnin Prophecy (Die Lehninsche Weissagung) which predicted the decline of the Hohenzollern dynasty, and reunification of Germany and restoration of the catholic church. The young Lenin could have heard the name Lehnin from his mother, who was brought up in German tradition and spoke fluently German. Dimitri, Lenin’s younger brother, remembered Volodia’s singing the lyrical songs of Heine. Anyway, once in power, Lenin made peace with Germany in Brest-Litovsk, the same Brest-Litovsk where in 1596 the Ukrainian bishops signed act of reunion with Rome. The leaders of the Russian Orthodox Church solemnly condemned the Treaty of Brest Litovsk.Under Lenin’s successor, a graduate of the Tiflis Theological Seminary the Kremlin became a sort of a Red Vatican. The party, like the ancient religious order occupied most public offices. Its Inquisition, the secret police NKVD or KGB mercilessly ferreted out all heretic. It saw its mission as the liberation (salvation) of all mankind; its missionaries carried the liberation theology to benighted lands. “The Thirteen Apostles” of the Politburo reminded of the Apostles of the Bolshevik Revolution described by Blok in his famous poem. The most sacred relic of all or Lenin’s body (cp. The Roman limina) was displayed in its black marble tomb like the incorruptible bodies of the saints in the Kievan Lavra catacombs.

The following is an excerpt from the book by Eric Jon Phelps Called Vatican Assassins:

The Jesuits are the true authors of socialist-communism. The economic system of the Dark Ages was feudalism consisting of the few rich landowners and the many poor peasants. It was a sin to make a profit by anyone other than the feudal lords. Thus, if the world is to be returned to the Dark Ages, the Protestant middle class must be destroyed. Socialist-communism accomplishes this, having yielded its bitter fruit in both Great Britain and the United States. The great deception is that the Jews are the authors of communism. (After all, is not Zionism Jewish communism?) The facts are that the Jesuits used their Masonic Jews to introduce it in 1848 and again in 1917 with the Bolshevik Revolution.
The Jesuits then moved their Shriner Freemason FDR to recognize Russia's bloody government in 1933. The Jesuits then financed Russian communism with their Knights of Malta on Wall Street. This enabled Joseph Stalin to carry out the purges of the Thirties.
Having deceived the world into believing communism was of Jewish origin, the Jesuits then used Hitler to implement 'the Final Solution to the Jewish Question'-pursuant to the evil Council of Trent. The result was the mass murder of European and Russian Jewry at the hands of the Jesuit-controlled SS.
At the close of the Second Thirty Years War (1945) the Jesuits, with their Vatican Ratline, helped top Nazis to escape to South America. And where in South America? To the old dominion where socialist-communism had been perfected by the Jesuit fathers-to the nation of Paraguay.
The Jesuits entered Paraguay in the early 1600s, sent by the kings of Spain and Portugal. They established their supremacy over the natives called 'Guarani Indians' and did not allow them to mix with the Spanish or Portuguese. It was among this people that the Jesuits established their communes called 'reductions'.
Napoleon in his Memoirs written on the island of St. Helena described the Jesuits as follows:
“The Jesuits are a military organization, not a religious order. There chief is a general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a monastery. And the aim of this organization is: POWER. Power in its most despotic exercise. Absolute power, universal power, power to control the world by the volition of a single man. Jesuitism is the most absolute of despotisms: and at the same time the greatest and most enormous of abuses....”
Pogrom Study
A Russian scientist recently published an extensive study of anti-Semitic violence in the aftermath of the Russian Revolution and Civil War, titled The Book of Pogroms. The author Lidia Milyakova, spent six years conducting research in the official archives of the Russian Federation despite undertaking the project with minimal funding.
According to the 1,000 page study,. Nearly 200,000 Jews were victimized between 21918 and 1923, with most groups fighting in the Civil War holding anti-Semitic sentiments. Several Jewish institutions, including Yad Vashem, publicly thanked Milyakova for her work, yet only 500 copies of the book were initially printed.

Hitler's Table Talk, 1940s

Christianity is an invention of sick brains...So it's not opportune to hurl ourselves now into a struggle with the churches. The best thing is to let Christianity dies a natural death...Originally, Christianity was merely an incarnation of Bolshevism the destroyer. Nevertheless, the Galilean, who later was called Christ, intended something quite different. He must be considered as a popular leader who took up His position against Jewry...For the Galilean's object was to liberate His country from Jewish oppression. He set Himself against Jewish capitalism, and that's why the Jews liquidated him...Christ was an Aryan, and St. Paul used his doctrine to mobilize the criminal underworld and thus organize a proto-Bolshevism

Hitler's order of the day to German troops on the eastern front -

God's mercy on our people and the entire world if this Barbaric enemy had been able to move his tens of thousands of tanks before we moved ours! ... this enemy does not consist of soldiers, but a majority of beasts... USSR poverty is a result of nearly a 25-year Jewish rule that, as bolshevism, is basically similar to the general form of capitalism...With the Lord's aid you not only will bring victory but also the most essential condition for peace.

New Testament vs. Old Testament

And all that believed were together, and had all things common; and sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need. (Acts 2:44-45) Neither shalt thou desire thy neighbor's wife, neither shalt thou covet thy neighbor's house, his field, or his manservant, or his maidservant, his ox, or his ass, or any thing that is thy neighbor's. (Dt 5:21)

John Paul II the Bolshevik

The book Crossing the Threshold of Hope by John Paul II can be regarded as a sequel to the book I Believe in Hope by Father Jose Maria Diez-Alegria, professor of Sociology at the Gregorian University. The communist creed of Diez-Alegria reminds us of the Saturnia Regna – the Golden Age of “peace and communism” praised by Virgil in his famous Fourth Eclogue, or the communist nomadism of Scythes recommended by Horace in his Odes (esp. III, 24). Interestingly, Virgil’s Roman “sparing the humbled and throwing down the proud” was identified by St. Luke in his Magnificat with God “scattering the proud and sending the rich empty away.”

The Crossing the Threshold of Hope reminds strongly of the book entitled Saat und Ernte. Proletarisches Hausbuch (Verlag: Die Wölfe. Leipzig 1927) which became kind of breviary of German Nazis. The book was rich in quotations of various Popes “crossing the threshold of Saturnia Regna.” For instance, Pope Gregory the Great taught the future followers of A. Hitler: “Die Menschen, die die Gabe Gottes zu Sondereigentum machen, beteuren uns vergeblich ihre Unschuld. Denn indem sie auf diese Weise den Armen ihre Lebensmittel vorenthalten, warden sie Mörderer derer, die täglich aus Mangel an Lebensmittel sterben.”

We also find in the book a hymn praising Apollo, the King of the Golden Age “verbindend, was bisher geknechtet,/ Erstarkend alle, die entrechtet.” It was in the style of Emperor Constantine reconciling the sun cult with Christianity and reminded of the “friars singing vespers in the temple of Jupiter” described by E. Gibbons in his Memoirs. We know that identification of Christ with Helios became the groundwork of father Copernicus’ work. In the words of Copernicus’ English translator, Th. Digges, “the Sun, like a king in the middest of al raigneth and geeveth lawes of motion to ye rest.”

It is obvious that Pope John Paul II, like the friar Th. Campanella,, one of the earliest admirers of Copernicus, believes that the communist utopia called Civitas Solis can be governed either by a Jesus refashioned into a beautiful Apollo or by Apollo himself. According to early Christians “monogamy was just as much a violation of the community of women required by divine justice as the private ownership of property is a violation of the community of goods.” In contradistinction, in the geocentric lore of the Hebrew Bible we find: “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife…nor any thing that is thy neighbor’s.” (Ex 20:17).

Let me quote in the above context an excerpt from Winston Churchill's article Zionism versus Bolshevism published on February 8, 1920 by Illustrated Sunday Herald: “There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews, it is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd) or of Krassin or Radek -- all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing.”

Well, Churchill saw one side of the problem; he closed his eyes to the rampant antisemitism and innumerable victims of pogroms perpetrated on the daily basis. He also ignored the true cause of the Bolshevik Revolution which was the political situation developing in Muslim Central Asia.

In 1916, with the region facing a massive famine, a revolt broke out after Moscow tried to draft Central Asians to fight for the tsarist army in WWI. The government also increased taxes and forcefully appropriated wheat from the region. The Kazakh and Kyrgyz nomads, who saw no reason why they should fight in Europe for the tsar, were first to rebel, and the revolt soon spread across Central Asia.

Fearing a war on two fronts Bolsheviks staged a coup d'etat and took power to conclude a speedy peace treaty with Germany in Brest Litovsk. Having secured peace on the western front, the Bolsheviks defeated the Muslim Basmachis (“bandits”), as they termed them. By 1929, the map of Central Asia had been forcibly redrawn into five Soviet republics, and the centuries of wars for control of the region seemed to have come to an end.

The Bolsheviks depicted Islam as a reactionary, mullah-led force supported by British imperialists that was trying to undermine the revolution and prevent progress and education. Countering this propaganda, the British portrayed the bolsheviks as a judeo-commune and this propaganda found a swift reception in the Mandate Palestine. The Arab riots of 1921 were fomented by the British through Arab leaders. And they still are.

On April 28, Bolsheviks seized power in Baku. All private property was seized; most oil barons fled Baku for other countries; most of the lavish residences built by the Oil Barons in the center of the city were confiscated and converted into multiple apartments for multiple families. Now, the Russians were closer to the Persian oil fields discovered in 1908 by the engineer George Reynolds - "solid English oak"- opening up oil development in the Middle East and conversion of the Royal navy from coal to oil fuel.

The UK was not the only power helping the Mufti in 1936. The USSR-sponsored Communist Party of Palestine also did its part. After the 1929 massacres (including the slaughter of 68 Jews in Hebron), the Communist Party issued a statement that “revolutionary movement without pogroms is impossible.” The Communists even considered the Mufti “too moderate” in his fight against Jews. In the run-up to the 1936-39 riots, the Palestinian leader began coordinating the organization of anti-Jewish violence. In November 1935, helping the Mufti’s propaganda campaign to spark Arab rage against the Jews. On the eve of the first riots, Communists met al-Husseini to work out the final terms of their roles in the upcoming violence. Communist Party member Nimr Uda became the intelligence chief for the Mufti’s military units. Another Communist representative, Fuad Nasir, was named deputy to Abdul Qadir Husseini, commander of Arab fighters in the southern West Bank.

Well, From Churchill's viewpoint, later political development in Soviet Union is inexplicable. Because Stalin easily sent a lot of his Jewish comrades to gulags and executed many others. When it suited him he exiled Trotsky himself and later got rid of foreign minister Litvinoff when he decided to strike a deal with Hitler against Anglo-Polish alliance. Churchill knew well that in politics it is raison d'etat which dictates moves and not a particular ethnicity. But he had chosen to follow the party line of the British upper class.

“There is an unsolved riddle in the history of the creation of the Third Reich, I think it is much more interesting than the question of who set fire to the Reichstag.” It is the question: “What became of the Germans.” - Sebastian Haffner

Indeed, what happened to Germans that they came to believe the Anglo-American propaganda broadcast by Hitler and his thugs and not the serious researches of their own German historians?

Theosophy which became the surrogate religion of Anglo-American intellectual elites is dreaming about “the day when the mind of the western race has broken away from Mosaic chronology and Mosaic ideas of man and nature.” (See William W. Judge The Ocean of Theosophy. 1893, p.62) And that explains their admiration for men like A. Hitler or Ahmadinejad who speaks so eagerly about wiping Israel off the map.

When L. Riefenstahl was captured and interrogated about her relationship to the party she admitted to “a certain admiration for the personality of the Fuehrer.” This sounded candid and forthright, emboldening her to add, “If that was a crime, then many people in the democratic countries are guilty too, because they have committed the same crime during the years from 1933-1939.”

the Vatican and the Jews

The crusades were supposed to bear expression of the supreme pontiff’s moral leadership of the western world (which was one of Gregory’s cardinal doctrines) and would bring the peoples of the north into closer relations with Rome. To Urban the crusade served four ends in addition to the obvious one of regaining the Holy Land for the cross. First, it would help to reunite Christendom after the bitter and divisive disputes over the Gregorian reform, and second, it would increase papal prestige at a time when there were supporters of the German emperor even in the city of Rome. Third, it would work toward ending the schism between the western and eastern churches. Urban had tried to bring the Greek Church in southern Italy under papal authority, but his plan had foundered on a theological dispute about the relationship between the Son and the Holy Ghost (the so-called Filioque controversy). A crusade might go to the heart of the matter by making the Byzantine emperor dependent upon, or even subservient to a Latin army. The fourth value that Urban saw in a crusade was a consequence of his own French background. He well knew that the Germans would not join his enterprise and that the powerful Anglo-Norman ruler would not be inclined to participate.

The backbone of the crusading army, aside from a contingent of Norman Italians, would have to come from the French principalities. Before he arrived at Clermont, he already knew that one of the leading French princes, Raymond of St. Giles, count of Touluse, would take the cross. As Urban began his highly emotional appeal to the “Race of Franks” to join the crusade, he already anticipated a favorable response. He offered his listeners the prospect of carving out kingdoms in Palestine, “a land flowing with milk and honey.” The influential French philologist E. Renan attemptet a “scientific” explanation for new racist and imperialist myths. He argued that Hebrew and Arabic were degraded languages, deviations from the Aryan tradition, which had become irredeemably flawed. These Semitic tongues could be studied only as an example of arrested development and lacked the progressive character of ‘our’ linguistic systems. That was why Jews and Arabs were both ‘une combinaison inferieure de la nature humaine: “One sees that in all things the Semitic race appears to us to be an incomplete race by virtue of its simplicity. This race – if I dare use the analogy – is to the Indo-European family what a pencil sketch is to a painting; it lacks that variety, that amplitude, that abundance of life which is the condition of perfectibility. Like those individuals who possess so little fecundity that, after a gracious childhood, they attain only the most mediocre virility, the Semitic nations experienced their fullest flowering in their first age and have never been able to achieve true maturity.” (Histoire Generale)

The Vatican’s ‘’No” to the Jewish State

When Th. Herzl approached Pope Pius X in Jan 1904, seeking his assistance for the Zionist venture, the pope dismissed him with these words: “We cannot favor this movement. The Jews did not recognize Jesus, our Lord, and we therefore cannot recognize the Jewish people. If you come to Palestine and settle your people there we will be ready with priests and churches to baptize you.” In 1938 Rev. Denis Fahey, professor of philosophy (like K. Wojtyla) published the booklet entitled “The Rulers of Russia” that received an imprimatur of Jeremias, Episcopus Waterfordensis and Lismorensis. And here is the most revealing paragraph of this booklet: “A step to be taken to undo the naturalism of the French Revolution and, at the same time, prevent onslaughts on the Jews, is to withdraw citizenship of other states from all of them and limit them to citizenship of one state, their own. That state must not be Palestine, for the Jewish claim to Palestine is implicitly a denial that they have disobeyed God and, missed their vocation by the rejection of the True Supernatural Messiah. It is the assertion in action that the promised Messiah has not yet come and that the day of their domination over the world will yet dawn. That way lays disaster, because all their naturalistic attempts to impose their will on God instead of accepting Him, will involve the Jewish nation in further dire catastrophes. It is not necessary to stress the fact that the Arabs have a natural right to the country they have occupied for at least 1300 years.” Who gave the Arabs the right to occupy Israel and Judea in the first place?

Just a few weeks after A. Hitler came to power in Germany, St. Edith Stein – a Catholic convert from Judaism who was soon to enter a Carmelite convent – wrote to Pope Pius XI asking him to condemn the Nazi ideology. The saint, who died at the Nazi death camp of Auschwitz in 1942 and was canonized in 1998, wrote to the pope April 12, 1933, saying the whole world was “waiting and hoping that the church of Christ would make its voice heard.” The letter, which St. Edith Stein referred to in other writings, was published for the first time in German and Italian newspapers Feb. 19, 2003 after scholars were given copies of the original from the Vatican Secret Archives.

Mario Palmeri in his “The Philosophy of Fascism” (Chicago 1936) proudly proclaimed: “Providence chose the Italian land for this civilizing process, nourishing a spark of divine truth in it “ab antico” (i.e. heliocentrism and evolutionism) and molding there a race wonderfully adapted in genius and intelligence for subjecting the whole world in Christian obedience. Italy is the priestly nation among the great body of redeemed peoples. Nor did the inhabitants of this peninsula give to other peoples merely divine gifts (Read the book “The Gifts of the Jews” – RP), but also every other civil and human good, and all the great intellects of Europe, who enhanced in any measure the glory of their countries, lit their lamps at the living flame of Italian genius.” A. Hitler called the Hebrew Bible, “Jewish folklore and therefore contemptible nonsense” and therefore was a darling of Pope Pius XII.
On 14 July 1938 the Italian Fascist university professors made public a long “Dichiarazione della Razza” in which they extolled a pure “Italian (Aryan) race” and made a sharp distinction between the Mediterraneans of Europe (Occidentals), on the one hand, and the Orientals and Africans on the others. They stressed that Jews did not belong to the Italian race. Arguing that “the purely European physical and psychological characteristics of Italians must not be altered in any way”, the foreshadowed the Nazi Holocaust of the Jews. This racist manifesto was supposed to justify the colonial conquest of Ethiopia and “carving out Latin kingdoms in Palestine”. In his “Doctrine of Fascism” (1932) B. Mussolini explained: “…the tendency to Empire, that is to say, to the expansion of nations, is a manifestation of vitality; its opposite, staying at home, is a sign of decadence; people who rise or re-rise are imperialist, peoples who die are renunciatory.” Hitler learned his doctrine of “Lebensraum” from Mussolini. In his encyclical “Mysticism Corporis Christi” issued in June 1943, Pope Pius XII declared: “…but on the gibbet of his death Jesus made void the Law with its decree, and fastened the handwriting of the Old Testament to the cross, establishing the New Testament in his blood…On the cross then the Old Law died soon to be buried and to be a bearer of death.” (The gigantic cross set up by the Polish church in Auschwitz is supposed to remind this papal justification of the Jewish Holocaust) That encyclical has a very interesting historical background.

In April 1938, editor of “America” sent Father LaFarge to the International Eucharistic Congress at Budapest. In the same year Civilta Cattolica published an article arguing that Hungary could be saved from the Influence of Jews, “disastrous for the religious, moral, and social life of the Hungarian people,” only if “the government forbids Jewish foreigners to enter the country.” The genocide of the Hungarian Jews by Eichmann was thus prepared by the Vatican. On June 22 LaFarge was in the pontifical antechamber in Castelgandolfo; the pope enjoined upon him to write the text of an encyclical on the moral evil of the anti-Semitism. And so at the beginning of July LaFarge returned to Paris, where he set to work on his new mission, together with Desbusquis and Gundlach. A week or so later, on 14 July 1938 the Italian Fascist university professors made public a long “Dichiarazione della Razza” in which they extolled a pure “Italian (Aryan) race”. The Encyclical Humani Generis Unitas was never promulgated by the Pope.

Then came the May 1939 British White Paper renouncing the Balfour Declaration and the mandate on which British authority rested. The document carried the imprimatur of Neville Chamberlain. It constituted an act of appeasement of the forces of evil that rivaled, and in some ways surpassed in its iniquitous consequences, performances at Berchtesgaden and Munich of the previous autumn. Plainly the policy of the Chamberlain government was to reduce the Jewish homeland to a Jewish ghetto within an Arab Palestine. From that policy flowed the greatest tragedy ever to befall a single people in written history – and perhaps not-unrelated decline of British power.

An Israeli radio commentator had predicted that by acquitting Jews of deicide, the Church Council, de facto, recognized the state of Israel as religiously legitimate. But could the Pope really agree with Israelis’ religious conviction that the establishment of Israel and the ingathering of the exiles was a fulfillment of the Old Testament prophecies? For, if the Scriptural prophecies have already been fulfilled in the coming of Christ, if the hope of Israel is to be identified completely with Jesus, then how interpret this revival that has occurred in the Holy Land? Would the Pope acknowledge that in the Jewish State God has provided a grace and a blessing to the Jewish people? That the hand of God is present in this enterprise? The Syrian President’s shocking anti-Jewish rant during Pope John Paul’s recent pilgrimage was bad enough. But soon Assad has flabbergasted even his own officials by Okaying an international Holocaust-denial conference in Damascus by the end of 2001. The conference was organized by French propagandist Garaudy, a former communist and a close friend of J.M. Card. Lustiger’s who converted to Islam. (Daily News, May 28, 2001)
Are Popes Good Christians?

G. Roncalli, the later Pope John XXIII was sufficiently cooperative with Pius XII’s anti-Jewish policy, to advise the Curia against Jewish transportation to Palestine, which might challenge Christian possession of exceedingly profitable Holy Places (Latin proverb says, Pecuniae obediunt omnia). In his letter of Sept. 4, 1943, to the papal secretary of state when the Jewish Holocaust was in full swing, Roncalli wrote: “I confess that this convoy of Jews to Palestine, aided specifically by the Holy See, looks like the reconstruction of the Hebrew Kingdom, and so arouses certain doubts in my mind…” The British knew what they were doing when they published their ill-famous White Paper.

In 1961 Archbishop of Milan G. Montini, the future Pope Paul VI prefaced a book by Angelo Alberti which invoked the traditional Catholic teaching that the “Jews are a people condemned to ruin.” On Nov. 26, 1961 George Ball, whose son studied Arabic at the American University at Beirut replaced Under Secretary of State Chester Bowles. In 1964 on advice of G. Ball (“there should be a voice of the Palestinians to speak for them”) Nasser decided to create a Palestinian organization, which would be under his control. And so PLO was born in cooperation with G. Ball, whose hobby was carpentry. He was a very “pious man”! Like his Catholic President.

Against the “Jewish” Democracy

During Vatican Council II, the anti-Semitic wing of the Church hierarchy distributed a pamphlet entitled The Council and the Assault of the Central European Block that contained an attack on those Bishops who allegedly had come under the influence of Jews and were seeking to destroy the Church by anti-Catholic development of collegiality. Because in political terms, the Popes are absolute monarchs (Recall, that during his pilgrimage to Lithuania Pope John Paul II strongly warned against the “defects of democracy”). A second pamphlet The Jews and the Council in the Light of Holy Scripture and Tradition drew upon the New Testament sources and the teaching of Church fathers to demonstrate that Catholic aristocratic teaching clearly recognized the Jews as an accursed people and a menace to the Church. The Bible teaches: “The rich and the poor meet together; Yahweh is the maker of them all” (Prv 22:2)

“Jews are a people condemned to ruin”

wrote in 1961 Archbishop of Milan G. Montini, the future Pope Paul VI in the preface to a book by Angelo Alberti which invoked the traditional Catholic teaching. When Abp. Montini wrote this sentence he was well aware of what happened not so long time ago in the Nazi Austria. The study by the Historical Commission, set up by the government in 1998, concluded that: “Austrians helped the Nazis drive Jewish tenants out of 59,000 apartments, sometimes in violent breakings, to make up for a housing shortage, while the companies helped to take over Jewish businesses in an effort to reduce competition. “ “The looting of some 200,000 Jews who were living in Austria before World War II was the first step toward their annihilation by the Nazis,” said a historian, Clemens Jabloner, as he presented the Historical Commission’s 14,000-page report. The study found that roughly 18,800 Jewish businesses were liquidated, more than 90 Jewish banking houses were closed and 600 Jewish associations and 325 foundations were dissolved by 1945 (NYT, Feb. 25, 2003). Well, Abp. Montini’s sentence on the Jewish nation prompted the Poles in 1968 to condemn to ruin the remainder of Jews who survived the Holocaust in their country.

To Nurture Links with the Islamic World:

The church is in a constant theological struggle with resurgent Islam in Africa. This prompts mention of the Vatican’s influential Council of Inter-Religious Dialogue – which is supposed to promote mutual understanding between Catholics and the followers of other religious traditions – headed by Monsignor Michael Fitzgerald, an Englishman, who could be described as “an Arabist”. Fitzgerald was appointed by the pope.

The Hebrew University’s Robert Wistrich is icily analytical in his evaluation of the papal pilgrimage to the Holy Land two years ago. “He handled himself with great dignity,” he says of the pope, “and acted like a skillful diplomat. He brought a moment of peace and tranquility.” But it was an illusion. “Since then, everything has been going downhill His subsequent visit to Syria was overshadowed by the Syrian ruler’s voicing of the worst Christian and Moslem libels, during which the pope remained silent. And the whole incident was trivialized when he returned to Rome. “Statements emanating from Rome have been slanted against Israel. There have been no condemnations of the suicide-bombing horror. An article published in *Osservatore Romano* – the Vatican’s official newspaper – virtually accuses Israel of genocide!” Well, Judge Goldstine is a professor at the Jesuit Fordham University.

Church’s attitude toward the Holocaust continues to cast a shadow. Minerbi, the former diplomat, detects a papal effort to “Christianize” the Shoah in many of the pope’s formulations, voiced long before his millennial pilgrimage. In 1979, during a visit to Auschwitz, Pope John Paul II declared, “Here six million were killed, and then added immediately, “a quarter of Poland’s population.” “It took the Vatican 10 years to compose the document entitled *We Remember, in which the Holocaust is described as ‘an inedible stain on human history,’” says Minerbi, “but at the same time there has been a constant effort to cleanse the Church of any guilt in the Nazi genocide. For example, in remarks at Yad Vashem, the pope said that “the Holocaust was perpetrated by a German regime on the basis of writings which are outside the Church.” (The Jewish Herald, Friday, Dec. 6, 2002)

In 1976, Card. Pignedolli endorsed in Tripoli, Libya a document asserting the Arab character of Jerusalem and demanding Israel’s withdrawal from all territories it had occupied in 1967. It was the Vatican’s “road map” to peace. When Pope John Paul I addressed a letter “Jerusalem, Israel” the next day he was found dead. Continuing the policy sealed by Card. Pignedolli in Tripoli, Pope John Paul II opened diplomatic relations with Libya and in an address to the Libyan delegation on Nov. 1, 1997 he expressed hope for a quick end to the UN air embargo. The Papal endorsement followed the Russo-Libyan consultation in Moscow Oct 22-23 and Russia’s help to reconstruct nuclear reactor in Tajura Nuclear center. Soon thereafter, Primakov cut a deal with Iraq.

In 1955 when Y. Arafat came to Prague as a representative of Palestinian students to the Social International meeting of students, a beautiful East German member of the Communist Party was sent on a mission to West Germany. In 1961 when the future Pope Paul VI sentenced Jews to ruin, the beautiful Ellen Rometsch moved to the US with her second husband, a sergeant in the West German air force who was assigned to the German Embassy in Washington. Rometsch had become one of Bobby Baker’s girls by early 1963. B. Baker was the man who did what the Democratic senators needed done, and discreetly got them what they wanted, including women. It was arranged, for Bill Thompson, the railroad executive to pick Rometch up at her apartment (when her husband was on duty) in the northwest Washington and take her to the White House. Rometsch later told Baker that “the president was really a fun guy and how delighted she was to be with him.” The President told Baker that Ellen was the most exciting woman that he had been with. Rometsch, 27 when they met, fulfilled another essential criterion for the president: she was a professional, a prostitute, who would do what was wanted, and keep silent. In B. Baker’s opinion “she was a Nazi.” E. Rometsch mission in Washington was to prepare favorable opinion for creation of Palestine Liberation Organization. And she did that exceedingly well. Hani al-Hassan, member of the PLO’s first central committee who had organized Palestinian students in Germany recalls: “Shukeiry told me that Nasser and the Arabs, in cooperation with Under-Secretary of State, G. Ball, have helped to create this organization.”

The sympathy for the Nazis runs deeply in the Catholic Kennedy clan. The New York Post revealed in its edition of Feb. 27, 2003: “MEDIA monolith Hachette Filipacchi, has a big problem: Saddam Hussein owns a $90 million stake in its parent company. Saddam owns just under 2% of Lagardere SCA, the French company of which Hachette Filipacchi Media US, publishers of Elle, Car & Driver, Women’s Day and (now defunct) “George” and other titles, is a unit. His shares are held by Iraqi-controlled Montana Management, based in Geneva. Saddam’s Hachette holdings first came to light when Iraq invaded Kuwait n 1990, and the UN Security Council along with the French and US governments acted to freeze Iraq’s assets. At the Time he was the second-largest shareholder in Hachette SA, controlling 8.4% of the company.”

In 1975 on centenary of founding the United Lodge of Theosophists in New York, the then Card.K. Wojtyla published in Rome book entitled Art of the Living Word inspired in part by the writings of the Russian-born foundress of Theosophy Mme Helena von Hahn-Blavatsky. In the same year twentieth printing of the Rulers of Russia was published in Hawthorne, Calif. 90250 by Omni Publications. Card. Wojtyla did know everything about the formative role of the American theosophical movement upon the birth of the German Nazism. He also remembered that shortly after organizing the United Lodge of Theosophists in 1875, a parliamentarian in the Hungarian Diet made the first “officially” anti-Semitic speech in any parliament in Europe. No wonder then that in the Solidarity Poland A. Hitler’s Mein Kampf became a best-seller being sold on every street corner. Recall in this context the words of a certain Dr. Engelka, a Nazi apostle; “God,” he said, “has manifested himself not in Jesus Christ but in Adolf Hitler.” “Jehovah, whom the Jews worship is the greatest of all criminals,” editorialized the Nazi weekly, Der Stuermer. “No one,” asserted Dr. Alfred Rosenberg, Nazi ideologist, “has the right to find fault with those of our people who have fund their Son of God (Hitler) and have thus regained their Eternal Father” (meaning Zeus).

On Dec. 24, 2000, the most popular Polish weekly Wprost revealed that the closest friend of the young Karol Wojtyla, the writer, W. Zukrowski collaborated with the Nazis. Assuming that friends know each other well, we may conclude that the future Pope approved of or even shared his friend’s sympathy toward the Nazis. Such a conclusion is fully justified if one considers that in those years the French Church welcomed Hitler’s occupation of France as an act of salvation. Hitler’s saying that the Bible is Jewish folklore and therefore a contemptible nonsense echoed the policy of the Polish Church which dethroned Jesus Christ and proclaimed Copernicus to be a new Savior in the saying ascribing to him the divine power to stop the sun and to move the earth. This saying explains the strange fact that the epitaph portrait of Copernicus showing his death bed conversion is totally ignored in Poland even though the Mongolian Post reproduced this portrait on a stamp issued in 1974. One could say, Jenghiz Khan, God’s scourge has risen from the dead.

This Opinionated, Slanted and Emotional BBC

The royal charter which created the BBC in 1926 requires the governors of the BBC to monitor and supervise compliance with the ethical code referred to as “The Producer’s Guidelines”. Impartiality, truth, dispassion, fairness, accuracy, context, faithful representation – these are the ethics of the BBC. Fidelity to that code is what gave the corporation its monumental reputation as the gold standard of current-affairs broadcasting. Until the intifada, that is. Just at a time when the Israeli journey turned suddenly perilous the BBC’s coverage of it turned suddenly rough. While professing to blow trusty horns of impartiality, its interviewers have become hostile, strident and clipped, without sympathy or empathy. BBC announcers uttering the word “Zionism”, “settler” or “Sharon” seem to do so through a curled lip. The BBC anchors pronounce words with Arab emphasis.

The Financial Times, in its weekend edition of Nov. 16-17, 2002, wrote: “In a study earlier this year of the BBC’s coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by the British lawyer Trevor Asserson and his research assistant the Israeli lawyer Elisheva Mironi, the authors found that the BBC breaches its license agreement to be impartial by ‘incorporating use of language, unbalanced reporting, inappropriate selection of material, and distortion or omission of facts – a clear and significant trend of bias’ against Israel and against Jews.”

Over to randomly selected periods of time, Asserson and his team analyzed the BBC’s major coverage of the Middle East in its main news programs. Then, collating their findings into the two reports, they documented in devastating detail breach after breach of the BBC. Those violations were many. They included emotive use of language, unbalanced reporting, selective use of material, distortion and omission of facts, an unfair choice of interviewees, an almost consistent sympathetic portrayal of Yassir Arafat with no corresponding profile of a major Israeli leader, refusal to use the legal and dictionary definitions of the word “terrorist,” calculated omission of Israeli viewpoints, suppression of stories that do not suit the BBC world view, the abusive use of pictures, biased reporters expressing personal views and an almost automatic attempt to find an anti-Israel angle to numerous news stories. Keep in mind that the BBC’s World Service, attracts an audience of 150 million listeners a week. Credulous listeners!

Why the BBC is so fond of Y. Arafat? Arafat is the mountain from whose top Muslims making the hajj stone the devil. Recall that Anglo-Israelitism held that the “chosen people” of the Bible are white Anglo-Saxons, that Jews were descended from Satan. Yassir has in his veins a Circassian blood, a magic ichor providing privilege and rank. So there was more to the stones that Palestinian children used to attack the Israeli soldiers than a simple resort to what was available. It was rajm or throwing stones against the Devil. Such a strategic weapon transformed those Palestinian kids into the British Israelites, a new chosen people of the Promised Palestinian Mandate. In the case of Intifada it was convenient to remind the world of the Children’s Crusade of 1212 which was supposed to conquer the Holy Land to establish the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem. That explains the enthusiasm of the Papal propaganda machine which made it impossible to deny the “children of Intifada” sympathy! Do you feel the same sympathy for German children (Hitlerjugend) fighting the Red Army? The so-called Polish London government also used children to fight the Germans…The most important thing, however, is that the name Arafat sounds like a battle cry in the ears of all Christians and Muslims because it reminds the ill-famous, anti-Jewish mantra of the Gospel of John: “ Jesus sad unto the scribes and Pharisees, You are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do: He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own.” This verse serves as the justification of the pseudo-scientific corrections introduced into the Bible by the author of the Latin Vulgate and the authors of King James Version. St. Hieronymus smuggled into the Hebrew Bible the philosophic heliocentrism by translating the Hebrew raqi’a with firmamentum, and King James Version suffused the Bible with philosophic evolutionism which is negated by the original version. These hoaxes are to prove racial inferiority of the Jews, a recurring dogma since Cicero’s bashing of the Jews.

How differently the Evangelical Christians broadcast their message to the world. Last week a group of Christian ministers created the Evangelical Israel Broadcasting Network (EIBN) to bring pro-Israel news and public service announcement to hundreds of Christian TV stations around the country. The new network will begin with one-minute public service announcement, which stations are running for free, “expressing solidarity with the Jewish people in Israel.” That will reach millions of Bible-believing Christians. Eventually, the network will feed news directly from Israel to Christian stations to counter “the distortions by the liberal media that have ravished Israel.” Like the now ill-famous BBC!

But a statement of principles proclaims that “EIBN believes the entire Bible is true, including the Great Commission that calls for all who name the name of the Lord to be a witness unto Him in Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria.” Trash your copy of “Crossing the Threshold of Hope”!“We have a strong belief that the rebirth of Israel in 1948, the restoration of Jerusalem in 1967 and the return of the Soviet Jews are a fulfillment of prophecy – most of which comes from the Old Testament,” Mike Evans, a Texas-based evangelist said. “So we believe what we are doing could usher in the return of the Messiah. Is that an ulterior motive? Indeed, it is; we would love the messiah to come back.” (The Jewish Week, Feb. 21, 2003)

Mr. Graham, son of the evangelist Billy Graham said last year that Islam was “a very evil and wicked religion.” Mr. Vines described Muhammad as “a demon-possessed pedophile.” (NYT, May 8, 2003) Remember Mr. Farrakhan calling Judaism a “gutter religion”? “Muhammad was a terrorist,” said Mr. Falwell

Consider in this context these facts; shortly after takeoff, Col. Ilan Ramon, the first Israeli astronaut commented on how the colors of the sky he was now part of were the colors of his country, of his people: blue and white (the papal flag is white and yellow). And his response came not in scientific or technological jargon, and not in the talk of the flamboyant fighter pilot or the emotionless “right stuff” astronaut. His response came in the simple, stirring words he recited every night he was up there in space…”Shma Yisrael, Hashem Eloikenu, Hashem Echad.” While up in space, holding the Torah scroll while speaking via satellite to the Prime Minister of Israel, Ilan Ramon said the Torah symbolizes “more than anything the ability of the Jewish people to survive everything, including horrible periods, and go from the darkest of days to days of hope and faith in the future.” (The Jewish Herald, Friday, Feb. 14, 2003)

It was no coincidence that when Col. I. Ramon was circling the earth aboard the shuttle “Columbia” The Polish rabid anti-Semitic priest Father M. Rydzyk was licensed to set up satellite television which will continue the propaganda tradition of such men as Father Coughlin, Rev. Denis Fahey and others. The policy of the Polish Church regarding the Jews was defined by encyclical letter of Pope Benedict XIV to the Primate of Poland of 14th June, 1751. And here is the most revealing passage of this letter: “Thanks to the labours of the synods, a resplendent and glorious victory was won over the Lutherans who had tried all ways and means to obtain an entrance into and secure a footing in this Kingdom. At the great Council of Petrikau (Piotrkow), to the great glory of God, the principle of “Liberty of Conscience” was proscribed and definitely excluded from among the principles governing the public life of the Realm…Now, if any one should ask what is forbidden by the Apostolic See to Jews dwelling in the same towns as Christians, We answer that they are forbidden to do the very things they are allowed to do in the Kingdom of Poland….We have learned, from the reports of trustworthy and honourable men, you have not leased either your goods or your rights to Jews and have avoided any dealings with them in lending or borrowing…At the same time, We solemnly assure you that, when a favourable opportunity offers, We shall treat of this matter, with all the zeal and energy We can muster, with those by whose power and authority the noble Kingdom of Poland can be cleansed of this foul stain.” Indeed, the Nazi Holocaust cleansed the “noble Kingdom of Poland of the foul stain” (meaning Jews) and that explains why A. Hitler’s Mein Kampf is being sold on every street corner in John Paul II’s homeland and why such a murderous anti-Semite as Father Rydzyk received papal blessing for his atrocious propaganda, and why Italy’s ambassador to Riyadh converted to Islam…

Let me remind here that before Card. K. Wojtyla became Pope John Paul II he used to teach at the Catholic University of Lublin which is a Polish version of the Belgian Louvanium, the most anti-Semitic University of the world. Father Kruszynski, a professor of the Lublin University in 1920 explained that “racial purity created what is called an anthropological type.” Three years later, Kruszynski would write: “If the world is to be rid of the Jewish scourge, it would be necessary to exterminate them, down to the last one.” Lest such views be thought to be regarded as less than respectable among the Catholic hierarchy in Poland of the time, it is worth recalling that two years later, in 1925, Kuszynski was named head of the Catholic University of Lublin. One shoud keep in mind that Hitler’s Mein Kampf is a summary of the perennial Catholic anti-Jewish propaganda of which the Bury St. Edmund Cross is the best example. The piece of art from the renowned Winchester Cathedral in England is now in possession of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. The litany of anti-Jewish hatred proclaimed by this crucifix prepared ideologically the Christian crusades. On the back of the cross, in the center, we see the Lamb of God. On the right, the bull, symbol of St. Luke (Cf. John Bull). On the left, the lion of St. Mark, and above, the eagle of St. John. The upright and crossbars are decorated with a spectacular series of prophets proclaiming by their scrolls the glory of the church triumphant. The figure on the left of the central medallion directing the spear against the Lamb, is the personification of Synagogue. She is hooded (inspiration for the Ku Klux Klan’s hoods); her head is bowed. Her eyes are closed; she seems almost blinded. With a lance, she is attempting to pierce the breast of the lamb. The writing on the scroll amounts to a twofold sign of contempt: “Accursed is who hangs upon a tree.” The Old Law prescribed that anyone who had committed a sin worthy of death should be hanged on a tree and cursed. But St. Paul, in his Epistle to the Galatians, had refuted the Old Law, saying, “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the Law…” Paul had turned the phrase around and said, in effect, Cursed are those who say, “Accursed is he who hangs upon a tree.” The interpretation of the cross as an anti-Jewish diatribe is confirmed by the writings of the tenth-century theologian Walafrid Strabo: “No more severe accusation must fall upon the Jews, and with good reason owing to their arrogance, than they saw their life, which is the son of God, hanging upon the wood and they disbelieved Him.” Thomas Hoving who described the cross in his book King of the Confessors (1981) found that eight quotations on the cross were foundation blocks of an essay composed by St. Cyprian in the late fifth century. It was Tract Against the Jews. The content of the Tract proclaimed: “You Jews who murdered Christ, you who looked upon him and did not believe, will be cast aside through all of time, punished and destroyed.” Then the author found out that other inscriptions were taken from a large body of literature collected by the French Abbe Migne in two volumes entitled Patrologia Latina and Patrologia Graeca. In the index to one word, Iudeos he found: “Against the Jews;” “The Perfidiousness of the Jews;” “Sermon Against Jews;” “Jews as Prosecutors of Christ;” “The Second Coming of Christ Against the Jews.” The author also discovered that his favorite Christian writer, Tertullian, had written a Book Against the Jews, and Eusebius, the respected and learned historian of the early Christian Church, had written in the fourth century a number of anti-Jewish tracts and essays. In one of them he even said that he possessed clear proof that Jews of every community of the world kidnapped a boy every Easter and crucified the child in a “ritual killing.” (Recall, Y. Arafat’s wife Suha, a permanent resident of France, tried to convince The First Lady H. Clinton that the Jews are poisoning the Palestinian wells and use depleted uranium to kill the Palestinians!

Jesus Christ “The Kryptonite”

Prof. Carl Becker in his book The Heavenly City of the 18th century Philosophers demonstrates that the period commonly described as The Age of Reason was, in fact, very far from that; that Newton, Voltaire, Hume, Diderot, and Locke were living in a medieval world inspired by the Arab philosophers such as: Al-Farabi, Avicenna, Averroes an others. There is no logical reason why the scientists of the 1980s should be any more infallible in their pontifical statements of scientific dogmas than their predecessors of the 1880s, or 1200s for that matter. European policy is developing a powerful Islamo-Christian symbiosis against Israel, orienting Europe toward Islam,and liberating Christianity from Judaism, which is viewed by Anti-Semitic factions as the embodiment of evil.

Napoleon embraced Galileo's Heliocentrism

The early apologist of Galileo, the Dominican friar. Campanella in his book Apologia pro Galileo (Frankfurt 1623) pointed out that Galileo shared Muhammad’s belief in “many worlds with lands and seas, and with human inhabitants. Muhammad, for political reasons, rejected the idea of the Biblical Eden planted by God on earth and embraced instead the idea of the garden of Immortality that the Babylonian myth placed in Heaven. Unlike the Biblical Adam who was simply “sent forth from the garden of Eden” (Gen. 3:23), the Koran’s Adam was “sent down from the garden” (Sura Ta-Ha 20:123). Similarly, in the so-called Gospel of Marcion Jesus was send down. Following his victory over the Sultan's forces at Abukir, Napoleon informed the disappointed skeiks that he was a "true Muslim," that he hated the Christians whose altars and crosses he had overthrown, and that he had abjured his former faith. Furthermore, he ascribed his military successes to being the chosen instrument of Allah, the Creator of the Universe.

In the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar,
Pontius Pilate being governor of Judea,
Jesus descended [out of heaven] into Capernaum, a city in Galilee,
and was teaching [in the synagogue] on the Sabbath days;
And they were astonished at his doctrine. (3:1/4:31)

The belief that mankind is not the sole representative of intelligent life in the Universe is very old. And it is more than a belief: as the philosopher Metrodorus put it in the thirst century B.C. ‘to consider the Earth the only populated world in infinite space is as absurd as to assert that in an entire field sown with millet, only one grain will grow.” St. Paul refers to this when he says that he was caught up to the Third Heaven (cp. The Third Rock from the Sun) and heard unutterable words in the body, or out of the body, I cannot tell” (2 Cor. 12:2-4). St. John also says he was “in the Spirit” i.e. in an ecstasy – when he saw the apocalyptic vision (Rev. 1:10). There was a class of diviners among the ancient Greeks called Extatici who used to lie in trances, and when they came to themselves gave strange accounts of what they had seen while they were “out of the body.” 2 Cor. 12: 2-3): “I know about one of Christ’s followers who was taken up into the Third Heaven fourteen years ago. I don’t know if the man was still in his body when it happened, but God certainly knows. As I said, only God really knows if this man was in his body at the time. But he was taken up into paradise, where he heard things that are too wonderful to tell.” (Cp. “And we have created over you 7 Heavens.” – The Qur’an 2.178)

“To believe that God created a plurality of worlds, at least as numerous as what we call stars, renders the Christian system of faith at once little and ridiculous and scatters in the mind like feathers in the air.” (Tom Paine) Let me remind here that the Roman philosopher Lucretius’s interest in other world went hand in hand with his disdain for religion.

American Astronomical Society commemorated Y. Arafat’s visit to the White House with the publication entitled, Strategies for Mars: A Guide to Human Exploration in which you will also find an article, Mars Mission Concepts: The Von Braun Era, because it was this former SS-major who in 1952 published his Das Marsprojetk, a plan to send spaceships to Mars. And in early 1998 the Mars Society was founded which proclaimed, “If we find signs of life, it will indicate that life is probably spread across the universe.” As Mohammed believed it was. And here Mohammed’s religious imagination encounters the ancient Roman UFO-mania as advanced by the philosopher Lucretius. Lucretius, the Roman disciple of the Greek atomists wrote like a modern believer in extraterrestrials: “We must therefore admit again and again, that elsewhere there are other gatherings of matter such as this one which our sky holds in its eager embrace…Now if the atoms are so abundant that all generations of living creatures could not count them, and if the same force and nature remains with the power to throw each kind of atom into its place in the same way as they have been thrown here, you must admit that in other parts of the universe there have been worlds and different races of men and species of wild beasts.”

Marcion rejected Christianity’s roots in Judaism and adopted philosophical cosmology of atomists. The Arab Palestinian Churches embraced this Marcionist heresy. In a lecture given in Paris in 1987 Father Youakim Moubarak called for the restoration of the Church of Antioch which he defined as a claim in the universal Church of “our vocation as Christians born out of the nations and liberated from Judaism and its law…This is what our Fathers called ‘the Economy of the mystery.’ It replaces the theology known as ‘the history of salvation,’ confined in the procrustean bed of the ‘Judeo-Christian tradition.’”

This theological remodeling undertaken with the collaboration of European Churches aims at relieving Europe of a Judeo-Christianity that is rejected in favor of Euro-Arabism through Islamic-Christian ecumenism aimed at a planetary symbiosis and globalization with an Islamic-Christian Euro-Arab Palestine as heart and focal point of Israel’s elimination. “Palestine” is an artificial European construct concocted in the 1970s to destroy Israel, and to liberate Christianity from its Jewish trunk and create an Islamic-Christian fusion, bringing Europe back into the Holy Land and to Jerusalem via the PLO. The premises of this strategy go back to Nazis and are adapted to the inexorable will to destroy Israel exercised by a Christian current powerfully structured by political and economic forces. (Bat Yeor, Dhimmitude and Marcionism, www.dhimmitude.org)

Let me remind here that the scholars never want us to forget that Luke wrote Acts with a purpose, to reconcile the two factions in early Christianity – Jerusalem and Antioch, those who thought that the Jesus-movement was always to be reconciled within the parent of Judaism, and those who believed that the Gentile believers were the new Israel, that ‘Judaism’ had been supplanted by ‘Christianity’. No doubt about that, Father Youakim Moubarak is like those French revolutionaries who defecated on the holy altar in Notre Dame cathedral in Paris and then, weeks later, cleaned it up and converted into a temple to Venus.

Bat Yeor, author of Islam and Dhimmitude. Where Civilizations Collide and Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis (2005) in her interview for FrontPage Magazine (September 21, 2004) said, Eurabia represents a geo-political reality envisaged in 1973 through a system of informal alliances between, on the one hand, the nine countries of the European Community which, enlarged, became the European Union and on the other hand, the Mediterranean Arab countries. The alliances and agreements were elaborated at the top political level of each EC country with the representative of the European Commission, and their Arab homologues with the Arab League’s delegate. This system was synchronized under the roof of an association called the Euro-Arab Dialogue (EAD) created in July 1974 in Paris. A working body composed of committees and always presided jointly by a European and an Arab delegate planned the agendas, and organized and monitored the application of the decision.

'Palestinian Centrality' vs Mecca Centrality

Asked what she meant by a “Euro-Arab Palestinian cult”, she answered: “It means precisely this Palestinian centrality that’s promoted in Europe as a key to world peace. However, the Euro-Arab Palestinian cult goes much deeper than a political tool used for a Euro-Arab Partnership policy against America and Israel. It is linked to theological currents of Judeophobia and a replacement theology based on the Palestinization of the Bible (so characteristic of King James Version of the Bible) and the rejection of its Jewish roots in order to delegitimize Israel’s history and rights on its land. The Euro-Arab Palestinian cult symbolizes the redemption of Christianity and Islam and their reconciliation on the ashes of “Israel, the work of Satan” – a belief propagated by the media’s continuous demonization of Israel (Like in Judge Goldstonee's report), and Palestinian victimization. This cult brings together neo-Nazis, Judeophobes, anti-Americans, communists and jihadists. It is a revival of Nazi anti-Jewish and anti-Christian trends, particularly in its hatred of Christian Bible believers and America, the country that was determinant in the defeat of Nazism and Communism. In the 1930-40, the Nazis had strong links with Palestinians, and those sympathies and alliances continued throughout the years after WWII, thriving in the Euro-Arab Palestinian cult that submerged Western Europe under the umbrella of the gigantic Euro-Arab Dialogue apparatus.

In the 1960s, nostalgic Nazi and fascist Anti-Semitic groups began strengthening ties with Arab countries engaged in bellicose actions to eliminate Israel. This pan-European and anti-American movement formed the nucleus of a European solidarity with Palestinian Arabs that became more assertive after 1967. It included fascist movements such as Jeune Europe, EuropaFront and Europe Réelle, the National Socialist Movement in England, the C.E. Carlberg Foundation in Stockholm, as well as centers in Malmö, Sweden, and other European cities, such as Strasbourg, Vienna, and Lausanne. The East European countries are less marked by the subservience syndrome of dhimmitude which consists in submission and compliance to Muslim policy or face jihad and death.

Czech Prime Minister Milos Zeman, during a visit to Israel, said there was a similarity between Y. Arafat’s Palestinian Authority and A. Hitler’s Third Reich. He also warned against adopting a policy of appeasement, and stressed that there should be no negotiating with terrorists. Zeman made the comments during a TV interview on Channel Two, “I am here to express some gesture of solidarity of one small nation with another small nation which faces the dangers in the fight against worldwide terrorism,” he said. (Shalom, No. 62-63, March-April, 2002)

Czech Republic Rejected Concordat - A Vatican official said the decision by the Czech Republic not to ratify a Vatican treaty was “shocking and full of contradictions.” “The Holy See’s stance is clear and unambiguous – it wanted this accord, signed it and sought to have it implemented,” said Archbishop Erwin Ender, a papal nuncio to the Czech Republic. (The Tablet, Aug 2, 2003) In Poland, they practice shooting to portraits of pope John Paul II.

An anti-Semitic letter being circulated in government circles in Ukraine was signed by as many as 100 well-known personalities, including two lawmakers, and calls on authorities and the Supreme Court to investigate the activities of Jewish groups in the country. The letter, which seems to replicate one circulated in Russia earlier this year, accuses Jews of undermining Ukraine’s independence and destroying the country’s “national character.”

Lunatics chasing lunarians. Extraterrestrial life has become a leitmotif of the US space program, a central justification for expenditures in the billions of dollars. On the other side the Soviet space program added a new, very dangerous neo-Nazi twist to their propaganda. Dr. V. Saitsev of the Minsk University in his articles A Spaceship in the Himalayas and Angels in Spaceships proclaimed, like Marcion centuries before did, that Jesus came from outer space and that he was a representative of a higher civilization, and that that would explain partly his supernatural powers and abilities. Dr. Saitsev article was actually a new version of the famous forgery The Unknown Life of Jesus Christ perpetrated by the czarist agent N. Notovich that made Jesus a disciple of the Tibetan lamas.

As Prof. Campbell observed, the power of the myth can be enduring. In 1991, a Polish-born astronomer A. Wolszczan “discovered” the first extrasolar planets in the constellation … Virgo, whence, centuries earlier, the Roman extraterrestrial savior, the protagonist of Virgil’s Fourth Eclogue came down. And when a German astronomer, Klaus Scherer explained away his discovery as radio signals coming from Pioneer 10 – a spacecraft that, having completed its survey of the outer planets, is now heading out into deep space, the Polish Argus-eyed astronomer came up with a preliminary evidence for yet another planet in the Virgo constellation, this time a Saturn-sized (recall Virgil’s Saturnia regna) object, and his new discovery was confirmed by MIT researchers Joshi and Rasio. Similarly, Ch. Darwin confirmed by his book The Descent of Man two philosophical dogmas proclaimed some years before by Hume and Hobbes.

The Mystery of MJ-12

J.V.Forrestal was a workaholic with a burning desire to join the ranks of the “sheikhs”. Within a few years of his arrival on Wall Street, he made a substantial fortune. He entered the Federal Government in 1940. In a short time, he was appointed Under Secretary of the Navy. When Secretary of the Navy William Franklin (Frank) Knox died in April 1944, he was the natural choice to replace him.

When Truman recognized the newly created state of Israel Secretary Forrestal was appalled: ‘no group in this country’, he wrote of the Jewish lobby, ‘should be permitted to influence our policy to the point where it could endanger our national security.’ At the same time he was lobbying for the Arab interests: ‘Unless we had access to Middle East oil, the American automobile companies would have to devise a four cylinder motor car.’ What would Arabs do with all that oil? A sheikh shows Ford a four-cylinder motorcar and a sheikh gets what he wants.

He resigned his Defense Department post on March 1, 1949. He was admitted to Bethesda Naval Hospital (where he was placed in a 16th floor suite which had originally been built for President Franklin Roosevelt) shortly thereafter for psychiatric care. His death is described as follows in his official biography: “After getting rid of the one person who could stop him quickly, Mr. Forrestal tied the silk belt from his dressing gown around his neck. After securing the other end to a radiator he removed a simple (as opposed to a security) screen and lowered himself outside. There was evidence that he hung for about one minute and then tried to climb back inside. Unfortunately it was at this point that the knot at the radiator end gave, dropping him to death. He landed on top of the roof of the third story passageway. The remains had to be removed from the roof where he landed.” Similarly died the pro-Arab Czech Foreign Minister Jan Masaryk.

But William Cooper, a member of the Intelligence Briefing Team of the Commander in Chief of the Pacific Fleet in his research paper entitled The Origin, Identity, and Purpose of MJ-12, a result of his own research into the TOP SECRET/MAJIC material, which he saw and read (http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/cooper/secret_government.htm)
mentions James Forrestal as the man who objected to the secrecy which prevented divulging any information about “a special group of America’s top scientists who were organized under the name Project SIGN in December 1947 to study the sightings of UFOs.” W. Cooper himself was not sure if the material that he viewed in the Navy was authentic and therefore he termed his paper a hypothesis. Consider this content of the material at his disposal: “An alien craft was found on February 13, 1948, on a mesa near Aztec, New Mexico. Another craft was located on March 25, 1948, in White Sands Proving Ground. It was 100 feet in diameter. A. total pf 17 alien bodies were recovered from those two crafts. Of even greater significance was the discovery of a large number of human body parts stored within both of these vehicles. A demon had reared its head and paranoia quickly took hold of everyone ‘in the know.’ The secret lid immediately became a Top Secret lid and was screwed down tight. The security blanket was even tighter than that imposed upon the Manhattan project.”

It was a hot period in the international politics resulting from the Soviet Union’s decision to support the establishment of the Jewish State; a long series of speeches by Soviet (and Soviet bloc) representatives, delivered in 1948, proves the coinciding interests of the Soviet Union and Israel at the time.
In March 1948, when the Americans, apparently having had second thoughts, tried to change the Assembly decision of November 29, 1947, and to substitute a temporary United Nations trusteeship for the partition plan, Gromyko, on March 30, accused the United States of being “concerned not with the just settlement of the question of the future of Palestine and the relations between Arabs and Jews, but with its own oil interests and military-strategic positions in the Near East.

Anticipating that some Jews might survive the Holocaust, the Polish puppet government-in-exile had Roman Knoll, a member of its foreign affairs office, draft a memo on the subject: “In the Homeland as a whole – regardless of the general psychological situation at any given moment – the position is such that the return of the Jews to their jobs and workshops is quite out of question, even if the number of Jews were greatly reduced. The non-Jewish population has filled their places in the towns and cities; in much of Poland this is a fundamental change, and final in character. The return of masses of Jews would be perceived by the population not as an act of restitution but as an invasion against which they would have to defend themselves, even by physical means…The government is correct in assuring world opinion that anti-Semitism will no longer exist in Poland; but it will no longer exist only if the surviving Jews do not endeavor to return to Poland’s cities and town en masse. Considering the difficult situation, the Homeland sees only one way out: the Polish Government must take the initiative – immediately if possible – with the aim of creating a national center for the Jews of Eastern Europe. This project should be drawn up in co-operation with Jewish Zionist circles; it should focus on an East-European territory for the future Jewish state, in preference to Palestine – which is too small for the purpose, too exotic, and has aroused conflict with the Arab world – and in preference to some to some tropical colony to which the Jews will refuse to emigrate. It may be too early to decide precisely what territory should be considered. Our attitude in this matter should be philo-Jewish rather than anti-Jewish…” (Quoted by Yisrael Gutman, Polish and Jewish Historiography on the Question of Polish-Jewish Relations During World War II. In: The Jews in Poland, ed. By Chimen Abramsky, Maciej Jachimczyk, and Anthony Polonsky. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986, p. 182). Let me remind that with the same purpose, Hitler wanted to resettle all the Jews to the Lublin area, but because of the strong opposition of the local population he had to give up the idea. Raoul Wallenberg entertained the same idea and that’s why, most likely, he was executed by the Soviets.

Almost immediately after the July pogrom in Kielce, Poland, masses of Polish Jews began pouring across the border to Czechoslovakia. Approximately 90,000 Jews left Poland through all exits during 1946. Prague was treated shabbily by UNRRA, whose representatives reneged on their commitment to reimburse the government for the cost of rail transportation for the Jewish refugees. At the end of the exodus, Czechoslovakia, which never asked for a prepayment for the trains, was owed $1 mil. The bill remained unpaid sixty years later. Toman, Deputy Interior Minister in charge of the State Security Department succeeded in convincing Gottwald that if the frontiers were closed to the Jews, it would seem as if Czechoslovakia was succumbing to British and American pressures. US ambassador Steinhard not only protested in the name of the US government that the Jews were flowing through Czechoslovakia and into American zone; he also recommended that Toman be removed from his post “because the Jews are always in favor of the Jews, and you should have there a Christian, not a Jew.”

Masaryk then informed Toman that Steinhard wanted him to close the border with Poland. Toman, however, insisted that the ambassador produce a written protest, and when it was submitted, he asked for a copy and arranged to have the top secret document privately photographed. Toman called Steinhard and, dispensing with pleasantries, said, “I’m going to send the National Guard and they will take you out of your office, and like a sack of potatoes we shall throw you out.”

Then Toman summoned Maurice Hindus, a French Jew who was a well-known foreign correspondent for the New York Herald Tribune, (Obviously, he didn’t send it to the New York Times) and explained the situation. He then handed the incredulous journalist a copy of Steinhard’s letter. Hindus’s story was published.

In meetings of the First Committee in April and May 1948, Gromyko (on April 20), the Byeolrussian delegate Kaminski (on April 21), and the Ukrainian representative, Vasili Tarassenko (on April 22), made a concerted attack against “politically bankrupt Britain” and against United States efforts to “wreck the decision on the Partition of Palestine.” On April 23, the Soviet delegate, A. Panyushkin, reiterating that the decision of November 29, 1947, “met the deep-rooted national interests of the Arabs and Jewish peoples of Palestine,” laid the blame for the situation in Palestine on “the United Kingdom, whose policy was calculated to kindle national hatred between Arabs and Jews.” He spoke of “Arab bands” which had penetrated into Palestine with the connivance of Britain.
The political line of James Forrestal regarding the UFO problem anticipated similar events mentioned above connected with Y. Arafat’s visits to the White House. He believed that the public should be told. James Forrestal was also one of the “first known abductees.” W. Cooper: “When he began to talk to leaders of the opposition party and leaders of the Congress about the alien problem he was asked to resign by Truman. He expressed his fears to many people. Rightfully, he believed that he was being watched. This was interpreted by those who were ignorant of these facts as paranoia. Forrestal later was said to have suffered a mental breakdown. He was ordered to the mental ward of Bethesda Naval Hospital. In spite of the fact that the administration had no authority to have him committed, the order was carried out. In fact, it was feared that Forrestal would begin to talk again. He had to be isolated and discredited. His family and friends were denied permission to visit.”
Finally, on May 21, 1949, Forrestal’s brother made a fateful decision. He notified authorities that he intended to remove James from Bethesda on May 22. Sometime in the early morning of May 22, 1948, agents of the CIA tied a sheet around James Forrestal’s neck, fastened the other end to a fixture in his room, then threw James Forrestal out of the window. The sheet tore and he plummeted to his death. James Forrestal’s secret diaries were confiscated by the CIA and were kept in the White House for many years. Due to public demand the diaries were eventually rewritten and published in a sanitized version. The real diary information was later furnished by the CIA in book form to an agent who published the material as fiction. The name of the agent is Whitley Strieber and the book is Majestic”
J. Forrestal died 4 days after Gromyko, on May 18, condemned the Arab countries “which are prepared to accept any decision, if only they can thwart the possibility of the creation of a Jewish State.” On May 20, Tarassenko attacked Britain as being directly responsible for the war in Palestine, or at least “for the actions of Transjordan’s armed forces in the State of Israel (which are) manifestly illegal and manifestly aimed at a breach of peace in Palestine… The UK bears the responsibility because it has inspired the actions of the Transjordanian armed forces. These forces are in fact armed forces of the UK…commanded by British officers, maintained by British money, closely connected with Britain and subject to British High Command…The UK Government is doing all it can to thwart the possibility of putting an end to the disorders in Palestine.”
The pro-Israeli – and, of course, at the same time, anti-British and anti-American – line of Soviet policy continued. In August 1948, a Soviet legation was opened in Tel Aviv, and at the beginning of September, Golda Meir, Israel’s first Minister to the Soviet Union, and her staff arrived in Moscow. From then on, the UN ceased to be the only forum of Israeli-Soviet contacts and dialogue.
As for Pres. Eisenhower, American Jews had noticed that he rarely spoke about their favorite subjects: Israel and the Holocaust. Eisenhower was not even certain that he – in Truman’s position – would have supported Israel’s birth; but now that it was an accomplished fact, he would have to live with it.
In 1953, Pres. Eisenhower picked up as his Secretary of State John Foster Dulles. Both John and his brother Allen were deeply entangled in the web of financial connections that linked Nazi Germany with the US. Allen Dulles was a former director of the German Schröder Bank (which financed Hitler) owned by Baron von Schröder; Allen’s brother John even sat on IG’s Farben Board before America entered war.

Dulles had German clients before the war and kept legal relations with them, and once he started work in the OSS he put these German connections to use. He knew German bankers and manufacturers who were politically conservative. He was very ingenious and used third parties such as the intelligence agencies of central European countries, where he also had contacts. Small wonder then, that so many Nazi officers and scientists (W. von Braun among them) found a ready welcome for their skills and research in the offices of the American intelligence services after Germany’s defeat.
Truman did not want to recruit even Nazi scientists, let alone sanction wholesale smuggling of Eastern European Fascists. Behind the President’s back a small coterie of right wing Americans committed mutiny. James Jesus Angleton told his old friend and informant, Montini (the future Pope Paul VI), that he and Pius XII had nothing to fear: everyone knew that Dewey would beat Truman in the 1948 election. In the meantime, Angleton and his friend Allen Dulles, would take care of everything.

They established a super-secret intelligence organization within the US State Department. While the CIA was hunting Nazis, the State Department was recruiting them with the secret help of the British, French, and the Vatican.
That explains how it was possible that during the post-Farouk era, the Grand Mufti held court at a closely guarded villa on Sharia Assuit Street in Heliopolis, a suburb of Cairo. There he entertained delegations from throughout the Arab world while maintaining close contact with radical nationalists from Germany and other countries. Among those who gathered at the Mufti’s house during the mid-1950s was the distant cousin, Yassir Arafat, then an engineering student at the University of Cairo. Former Major General Otto Ernst Remer, Fűhrer’s chief bodyguard, who would collaborate with Arafat in the years ahead, also visited the esteemed Grossmufti on several occasions. They share fond recollections of A. Hitler and indulged in the usual talk of driving the Jews into the sea.
The Grand Mufti’s network of sympathizers extended far and wide. Otto Skorzeny also collaborated with the Muslim religious leader. According to A.F.X. Baron, a prominent British fascist, Skorzeny was instrumental in funneling more than a million dollars, which the Mufti had raised for anti-Zionist and anti-Jewish propaganda, to various no-Nazi groups around the world.

Several German propaganda experts adopted Arabic names when they emigrated to Egypt. Johann von Leers, one of the Third Reich’s most prolific Jew-baiters, converted to Islam and became Omar Amin. He got a job with the Egyptian Information Ministry, thanks to the good offices of the Grossmufti. With von Leers in charge, Cairo’s anti-Israeli propaganda machine churned out hate literature and inflammatory broadcasts on a regular basis. Assisting von Leers were dozens of European Nazis who welcomed a fresh opportunity to continue their vendetta against the Jews. They had regular access to Radio Cairo, which utilized a powerful CIA-constructed transmitter to spread the message throughout much of the Arab world.

Pres. Eisenhower’s enmity toward Israel went hand in hand with his interest for the UFO problem. W. Cooper relates what he found in the secret papers: “President Eisenhower met with the aliens on February 20, 1954, and a formal treaty between the alien nation and the United States of America was signed. We then received our first alien ambassador from outer space. He was the hostage that had been left at the first landing in the desert. His name was ‘His Omni-potent Highness Crill or Krill,’ pronounced Crill or Krill. In the American tradition of disdain for royal titles he was secretly called ‘Original Hostage Crill, or Krill.’ Shortly after this meeting President Eisenhower suffered a heart attack. Obviously, President Eisenhower followed in the footsteps o Napoleon Bonaparte as a new Sultan Kebir enlightened by The Galileo heliocentrism.
Four others present at the meeting were Franklin Allen of the Hearst Newspapers, Edwin Nourse of Brookings Institute, Gerard Light of metaphysical research fame, and Catholic Bihop (sic!) MacIntyre of Los Angeles. Their reaction was judged as a microcosm of what the public reaction might be. Based on their reaction, it was decided that the public could not be told. Later studies confirmed the decision as sound.”

The secret NASA footage posted all over the Internet shows the alien moon base located on the Dark Side of the moon.

Priests at the Vatican Observatory do continue their researches in the spirit of that “meeting.” According to Berliner Morgenpost, they have come to conclusion that “earth’s inhabitants are not the only creatures of God in the universe. As explained by George Coyne, director of the observatory, “the universe is simply far too large for us to be alone.” To reach these extraterrestrials with the Gospel, several monasteries have been sending the Syrian New Testament (Peshitta) into space as an encoded message. What the Vatican would like to know, says the newspaper, “is whether Jesus Christ has manifested himself on other planets too.” And, adds Coyne, “Whether Jesus Christ has also saved the inhabitants” of those planets. The basic dogma of the materialist philosophy of the Roman Epicurean Lucretius recognized life not as created by a god but as evolving from dead atoms in infinite universe: “Life does not differ essentially from other matter; it is a product of moving atoms which are individually dead. As the universe took form by the inherent laws of matter, so the earth produced by a purely natural selection all the species and organs of life.” Keep in mind that it was a catholic priest Setttele who toof an oath of fidelity to Napoleon who recognized heliocentrisc hypothesis as a 'fact' in 1820.

G. Bruno proclaimed, The earth is not the center of the world, nor is the sun; beyond the world that we see there are others worlds, and beyond these other worlds are other worlds again (expanding universe), and so on endlessly; we cannot conceive an end, nor a beginning. And instead of the “fixed” stars being fixed, as Copernicus thought, they change their place constantly; even in the skies panta rei, all things flow. Space, time, and motion are relative; there is no center, no circumference, no up or down; the same motion differs when seen from different places or stars; and as time is the measure of motion, time too is relative. Probably many stars are inhabited by living, intelligent beings; did Christ die for them too? Yet in this endless immensity there is an invariable conservation of matter, an eternal and inviolable constancy of law.

“An eternal and inviolable constancy of (natural) law? W. Cooper in his book Behold a Pale Horse reports: “…the document that I read while in Naval intelligence stated that Project GALILEO required only five pounds of plutonium to ignite Jupiter and possibly stave off the COMING ICE AGE. Global warming is a hoax like the “landing on the moon”is easier for the public to deal with and will give the ruling elite more time before panic and anarchy replace government. The reality is that overall global temperature are becoming lower…” That would explain the US government’s reluctance to ratify the Kyoto agreement on “global warming.”

The Copernicanism began a process of exterminating and replacing the Bible with “science” as the new source of Absolute Truth. Kepler, Galileo, and Newton, supported by philosophers such as Descartes, Spinoza, Leibnitz, Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer established heliocentric mythology solidly over a 300-year period in the universities. In 1820 Canon Giuseppe Settele, professor of astronomy in Rome and Washington, had written an elementary book in which the Copernican system was taken for granted. On the 16th of August, 1820, the Congregation of the Holy Office (Inquisition) decided that Settele might teach the Copernican system as established, and this decision was approved by the Pope. On the 5th of May, 1829, Thorwaldsen’s statue of Copernicus was unveiled in Warsaw. In the 1880s philosopher Nietzsche boasted: “god is dead; we have killed him with our science!”

The Passion of the God of the Bible continues. The author of the website NASA’s Agenda: Promoting Copernicanism & Evolutionism describes how NASA’s ORIGINS PROGRAM will search for clues to help us find our cosmic roots, to eliminate once and for all the Biblical story of Creation. Another author of website article NASA’s Hanky-Panky: Virtual Reality Technology unmasks how NASA will be inputting information that is to be presented as real when it is not real. Cyberpunks will be representing a merging of science fiction and bohemia. The double rehabilitation of   Copernicanism and Darwinism by the Pope sounds like a new obituary proclaiming death of the God of the Bible (His Ten Commandments had been put into solitary confinement in the Alabama court building). NASA is getting its New Generation Space Telescope (NGST) on line! When it gets cranked, it will transmit all sorts of visual “evidence” of life forms from Mars on out to deep space.

“...at the time of writing we now know of 170 extra-solar planets orbiting 147 stars, but the figure will certainly have increased by the time you read this book. So far, they are bulky 'Jupiters', because only Jupiters are large enough to perturb their stars into the zone of detectability of present-day spectroscopes.” (R. Dawkins, The God Delusion. 2006:71)