“The only pagan contamination in Israel was among the very rich, inspired by self-interest or snobbery, and there were not many of these” (Daniel Rops, Jesus and his Times. 1954, p.408)
As fire when thrown into water is cooled down and put out, so also a false accusation when brought against a man of the purest and holiest character, boils over and is at once dissipated, and vanishes and threats of heaven and sea, himself standing unmoved. Marcus Tullius Cicero
Go to the link http://www.gnosticjudas.com/jesus.php, to see an unusual portrait of Jesus.
Early Christian “doctors” were constantly contradicting themselves as to when exactly “the Lord” died or “ascended to heaven” after “he” was resurrected. Two of the most powerful early bishops, Irenaeus and Papias recorded that Christ lived to be very old, flatly denying as 'heresy' the Gospel stories as to his crucifixion at about thirty years of age.” In one of the Warsaw churches there is a statue of a very old Jesus. The Poles commemoratred this strange fact in a saying: “U fary jest Pan Jezus stary.”
Saint Irenaeus (Greek: Ειρηναίος), (2nd century AD - c. 202 AD) was Bishop of Lugdunum in Gaul, Roman Empire (now Lyons, France). He was an early church father and apologist, and his writings were formative in the early development of Christian theology. He was a disciple of Saint Polycarp, who was said to be a disciple of Saint John the Evangelist.
But unlike John who introduced to his gospel the philosophical demiurge (Logos), Irenaus preferred to speak of the Son and the Spirit as the "hands of God". The world has been intentionally designed by God.
In addition to reversing the wrongs done by Adam, Irenaeus thinks of Christ as "recapitulating" or "summing up" human life.This means that Christ goes through every stage of human life, from infancy to old age, and simply by living it, sanctifies it with his divinity. Irenaeus argues that Christ did not die until he was older than conventionally portrayed.
Ireenaeus' theology can be better understood in the context of Clement's letter to the Corinthian church, which is one of the oldest Christian documents still in existence outside the New Testament.
Saint Clement I, also known as Pope Clement I, Saint Clement of Rome, or Clemens Romanus, was the fourth Pope and Bishop of Rome and is considered the first Apostolic Father of the early Christian church. There are only two extant Greek texts of 1 Clement. The oldest is in Codex Alexandrinus, which dates to the 5th century.
"When it has lived 500 years, it builds itself a nest in the branches of an oak. In this it collects spices, and of these materials builds a pile on which it deposits itself, and dying, breathes out its last breath. From the body of the parent bird, a young Phoenix issues forth. When this has grown up, it lifts its nest from the tree and caries it to the city of Heliopolis in Egypt and deposits it in the Temple of the Sun."
- Ovid in his Metamorphoses
The proud Egyptian father, holding an emblem of life, the Ankh, uttered the most solemn wish an Egyptian father could make for a newborn child: “May you exist for millions of years, like the sun”! The capstone, or pyramidion placed on top of all pyramida was known in ancient Egyptian language as the Benben and was conidered to be a symbol of the Bennu bird (and thus also of rebirth and immortality. These capstones were replicas of the original benben stone – perhaps a conical 'oriental meteorite' – which was said to 'have fallen from heaven' and which was kept in Heliopolis, perched atop a pillar in a Temple called the “Mansion of the Phoenix”.
Clement:
Proof of the Resurrection – rebirth of the Phoenix! Not the Risen Christ!
"Let us understand, dearly beloved, how the Master continually showeth unto us the resurrection that shall be hereafter ...
Let us consider the marvellous sign which is seen in the regions of the east, that is, in the parts about Arabia.
There is a bird, which is named the phoenix. This, being the only one of its kind, liveth for five hundred years; and when it hath now reached the time of its dissolution that it should die, it maketh for itself a coffin of frankincense and myrrh and the other spices, into the which in the fulness of time it entereth, and so it dieth.
But, as the flesh rotteth, a certain worm is engendered, which is nurtured from the moisture of the dead creature and putteth forth wings. Then, when it is grown lusty, it taketh up that coffin where are the bones of its parent, and carrying them journeyeth from the country of Arabia even unto Egypt, to the place called the City of the Sun; and in the day time in the sight of all, flying to the altar of the Sun, it layeth them thereupon; and this done, it setteth forth to return. So the priests examine the registers of the times, and they find that it hath come when the five hundredth year is completed.
Do we then think it to be a great and marvelous thing, if the Creator of the universe shall bring about the resurrection of them that have served Him with holiness in the assurance of a good faith, seeing that He showeth to us even by a bird the magnificence of His promise?"
– The Epistle of St Clement to the Corinthians
In the New Testament of Christian Bible, a provocative and most serious challenge is laid on the whole of Christianity. Since it bears directly on our subject, we will quote it:
"...if Christ be not risen, then our preaching is in vain, and your faith is also in vain. Yea, and we are found false witnesses of God... And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins."
(I Cor 15:14, 15, & 17)
According to Tertullian (Demurrer Against the Heretics 36 and 32:2) Clement was ordained by Peter.
In the Gnostic document entitle Revelation on Pistis Sophia, the Phoenx, which periodically puts itself to death (like Jesus) and resurrects, is said to have been created as a witness for the iniquitous judgment passed upon Adam by the Archons. (Jean Doresse, The Secret Booksa of the Egyptian Gnostics.1986, p.169)
Tha Acta Diurnia or “daily gazette” chronicled events both momentous and trivial in Rome and the empire. Pliny drew on the acta for a number of the oddities he records in his Natural History. Some events reported in the Acta were too far-fetched even for the credulous Pliny to swallow, however, and he treats them with caution. The reputed sightings of a phoenix was one of these. (www.com.washington.edu/program/c)
Stoicism- the Backbone of the New Testament
The Stoics translated the pheonix myth into their philosophical jargon.. Stoicism consider the universe on a path to conflagration.The end of the human history will meet its doom in a massive conflagration that will cause all things to return to their original state, exactly like the phoenix does. What makes the association with Christianity more interesting is the tag at the end of Cicero's note on the subject when he declares that there will b e a conflagration so that “once again a new world may be created and the ordered universe be restored as before” (Early Stoic Physics, SVF II, 593). The same philosophy lies behind Big Bang.(Cp. The idea of a new earth in the New Testament)
The Stoic teaching that fiery breath (pneuma) infusing the physical body reverberates in Jesus' saying that The kingdom of heaven is like unto leaven, which a woman took, and hid in three 'measures of flour, till the whole was leavened.' (Lk 13:20-21). The Stoics contrasted soul and matter. These two principles are the active and passive. Matter is identified with the passive principle. Its complement, the active principle, is reason (LOGOS) or God and is held to extend through matter providing it with motion (like leaven in flour), form, and structure. Both principles are bodily or corporeal principles, but neither exists in isolation.
Pneuma was the “creative fire” of the cosmos, a pyr technikon. It had the status of divinity, and was equated with both god and cosmic reason. Ex 32:24 reports miraculous birth of Golden Calf out of creative fire: `Let any who have gold take it off'; so they gave it to me, and I threw it into the fire, and there came out this calf." The Vedic god Surya was a solar bull. According to the Assyrians, the bull was born of the sun. There is a link between this philosophy and the words of Jesus reported by John 3:14 (See below).
According to Zen theology the Buddha is “the deity of fire who seeks fire”. The cloven tongues of fire that appeared on the Apostles’ heads symbolized their enlightenment (buddha lit. means the enlightened one) – they became “jamad-agni”, those who knew the identity of god and fire. The cloven tongues of fire on the Apostles’ heads are logically connected with Jesus words (Lk. 12:49): “I am come to send fire on the earth…” Here Christ confronts the Jewish belief in personal God with the atheistic impersonal Absolute of the Aryan religion. Brahman is a neuter word which means energy or fire, or sun.
Paul wrote in 1 Cor 15:16-17: “For if the dead rise not, then is not Christ raised: And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain...
On Feb. 9, 1989, A. Sakharov traveled to Italy where he spent more than an hour in private audience with the Pope John Paul II and received an honorary doctorate in astronomy from the University of Bologna. Rector of the University said on this occasion: “Not by chance has he (Sakharov) been placed in the company of Copernicus, of Galileo and of Giordano Bruno. Not by chance is the book chosen for the laureation of A. Sakharov The Dialogue of the Two Greatest Systems by Galileo: a choice meant to recall the spirit of liberty…” Or I would say, license to kill the remaining Jews...
In 1992 Pope John Paul said: “Galileo sensed in his scientific research the presence of the Creator who, stirring in the depth of his spirit, stimulated him, anticipating and assisting his intuitions.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei)
Only disregard for teaching of the Bible and a blind admiration for the tradition of philosophical doctrines explains the view of Kepler that man’s ability to understand the mathematical law governing the universe enabled him to mirror God’s own thoughts and thus put him in special contact (mystical union) with the Creator of the Universe. (Cp. Jesus words: “My Father and I are one.” Jn. 10:30). Kepler's God was Plato's metaphysical God (Logos) who is a-historicist mathematician who eternally geometrizes.
The same God wrote for Galileo the Book of Nature. Galileo on the Book of Nature.“Philosophy is written in that very large book that is continually opened before our eyes (I mean the universe), but which is not understood unless first one studies the language and knows the characters in which it is written. The language of that book is mathematical and the characters are triangles, circles, and other geometric figures.” (Galileo Galilei: Pensieri, motti e sentenze; Florence, 1949) The Hindu Vishnu holds a disc or a rounded piece of gold in his hand. The Egyptian Ra wears a disc as a crown). Will future encyclicals be written in mathematical equations? The God on the front page of the Renaissance edition of the Vulgate wears a triangle on his head.
www.flickr.com/photos/19279530@N00/841587900/
special.lib.gla.ac.uk/exhibns/month/nov2007.html
www.iblistforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=115114...
http://flickr.com/photos/78957022@N00/392513034
Prof. A. Sakharov's Solar Phoenix
Solar Phoenix and the birth of Fascism/National Socialism. Jules Soury, the Father of the French Fascism and an apostle of Haeckel , declared,'Matter is a phoenix which does not consume itself except in order to emerge from its own ashes, rejuvenated. In the eternal fecundity of the chaos of the world, the Milky Way composed of innumerable suns, is the same as the flower or insect on earth. Neither God nor transcendental spirit but 'matter ...alone subsists, uncreated; worlds (arise) and pass away, subjected like all other beings to an endless cycle of generation and destruction. This is the general law from which our solar system cannot escape.'
The Soviet physicist “proved” that the sun is an immortal god in his dogma of the “solar phoenix”, or strictly materialistic principle of the “spontaneous resurrection of energy (brahma) such as takes place in the sun's core.” And this scientific dogma explains the strange Latin expression "resurrexit” (“he has risen again”) which in nonscriptural references is used almost invariably and surrectio (“risen”) hardly ever. Resurrectio suggest natural process repeating itself time and again and not a “historical fact” as exemplified by the risen Jesus. The term resurrectio mirrors Plato’s cosmology which was cyclic, with periodic destruction and recreation of the universe in conjunction with various astronomical events. Sakharov wanted to undo Patriarch Nikon’s reform who in the 17th century dropped the part of the phrase concerning sanctification “by the Holy Spirit and by fire” because “fire” did not have sufficient textual warrant, and this offended those who believed that the Holy Sprit was Himself fire according to the Aryan dogma. Prof. Sakharov was a true Aryan “jamad-agni”, or a sage who knows the identity of god and fire.
Quoting from the Britannica article on “stellar evolution”:
The spread of luminosities and colors of stars within the main sequence can be understood as a consequence of evolution...As the stars evolve, they adjust to the increase in the helium-to-hydrogen ratio in their cores...When the core fuel is exhausted, the internal structure of the star changes rapidly; it quickly leaves the main sequence and moves towards the region of giants and supergiants.
The Sun is destined to perish as a white dwarf. But before that happens, it will evolve into a red giant, engulfing mercury and Venus in the process. At the same time, it will blow away the earth's atmosphere and boil its oceans, making the planet uninhabitable.
And was it always said that the manner of Jesus' death was crucifixion? Apparently not. Here is what is written in Baraitha Bab. Sanhedrin 43a:
On the eve of Passover Yeshu was hanged. For forty days before the execution took place, a herald went forth and cried, "He is going forth to be stoned because he has practiced sorcery and enticed Israel to apostasy. Any one who can say anything in his favour, let him come forward and plead on his behalf." But since nothing was brought forward in his favour he was hanged on the eve of the Passover! - Ulla retorted: Do you suppose that he was one for whom a defence could be made? Was he not a Mesith [enticer], concerning him Scripture says, Neither shalt though spare, neither shalt thou conceal him? With Yeshu however it was different, for he was connected with the government for royalty [i.e., influential]. Our Rabbis taught: Yeshu had five disciples, Matthai, Nakai, Nezer, Buni, and Todah.
How was Jesus connected with the Government?
King Hezekia encouraged by prophet Isaiah restored the celebration of the Passover and destroyed the “brazen serpent” crafted long-ago by Moses in the wilderness which had become an object of idolatrous worship.
The Gnostic Jesus asks Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews (John 3: 14): “And as Moses in the desert lifted the serpent on the pole, the Son of Man must be lifted up. That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life”. True, Moses set a “fiery serpent upon a pole” in order to calm panic of the people bitten by fiery serpents” (Num. 21:8). Obviously, this episode of the brazen serpent matches that of the Golden Calf and both events confirm that the Jews who left Egypt were still attached to the symbols of the Egyptian religion that they must have professed during centuries of their bondage. The brazen serpent called Nehushtan continued to be venerated by the people until it was destroyed by King Hezekiah (2 Ki 18.4). But Jesus seems not to have known that or simply ignored the fact of destruction of the pagan religious symbol. His mindset reminds strongly the mindset of Pope Pius II who believed that the Roman Empire had fallen because the scholars had deserted paganism for the Papacy. A pre-Christian relief from Cyprus shows a combination of serpents, crosses and swastikas. Recall that Philistines (or Palestinians according to KJV) came to Egypt and Canaan from the Mediterranean islands. The Capernaum “synagogue” which, according to the Gospels, was built by a Roman officer and was used by Jesus to preach, had the walls adorned with the perennial solar symbol, swastika.In 167 BC Hellenized Jews cooperated with Antiochus IV to sacrifice pigs to Dionysus in the Temple of Jerusalem.
A strange but related story is told in Acts 28:1-6; in this story the apostle Paul is visiting the 9-mile-long island Melita (Malta), a center of serpent-soul worship beneath the southern tip of Italy. The underworld of the gods, it was claimed, was accessed from this island. Paul is bit by a serpent or viper, “which came out of the heat and fastened on his hand” (similarly the golden calf came out of the heat). But Paul shook off the beast into the fire, and felt no harm. The Maltese said he was a god.
This collaboration with the Herodians and their political tool the Sanhedrin to promote the faith in immortality was what the Romans needed in order to continue the occupation of Judea. Everywhere attention to Rome and the real situation in Palestine were deflected to otherwordly concerns. The New Testament seems to be a sort of fairytale situated in a very bloody, turbulent time.
Can you imagine the better pro-Roman propaganda that the one preached in the Sermon on the Mountain: “Ye have heard that it hath been said (Lev. 19:18), Thou shalt love thy neighbor, and hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; that ye may be the children of Your Father who is in heaven: for he makes his sun rise on the evil and the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust' (Mt. 5:43-45). The passage quotes Lev 19.18, 'love your neighbor as yourself', and then it attributes to others the reverse, 'hate your enemy'. The second half is not a quotation from the Bible.
The impression that Jesus was a poor man, and even homeless is supported by the Gospel of Matthew (8:20) where Jesus says about himself: “The foxes have holes and the birds of the air have nests, but I (the Son of man) hath not where to lay his head.” The inspiration for this verse is very revealing. 130 years before Christ Tiberius Gracchus such a thought for the whole proletariat of Rome: “The wild beasts of Italy have their holes and their lairs, in which they rest, but the men that fight and die for Italy's power have nothing but air and light, because this they can not be robbed of. They roam with their wives and children without house and home.” Interestingly, a early Christian mosaic depicts Jesus wearing uniform of a Roman legionary.
Let me remind in this contxt the pertinent observation by Karl Kautsky in his Foundations of Christianity: “Compare the sermon on the Mount in Luke and in Matthew, which is later. In the first it is still a glorification of the poor and a damning of the rich. By Matthew's time this had become a touchy subject for many Christians, and the Gospel according to Matthew boldly turns the poor who are blesed into the poor of spirit (simpletons), and leaves the damning of the rich out altogether.”
Who Pays the Piper Calls the Piper's tune
“For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance; but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath. Cast ye unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” (Mt 25: 14-30) This excellent summary of market operations was expressed by Jesus at a banquet he partook of in the home of a rich taxcollector. And don't forget "Give to the emperor the things that are the emperor's, and to God the things that are God's." (Mt. 12:17; Lk 20:26). Jesus was not leading riots against Herod's tax collectors, like he was doing at the Jerusalem Temple, he was sharing meals with them.
Jesus doesn't seem to have thought of ending poverty. He took for granted, like all the ancients, that a slave's duty is to serve his master well; “blessed is the slave whom his master, returning, finds performing his charge” (Mt. 24:46). He is not concerned to attack existing economic or political institutions, on the contrary, he condemns those impatient, ardent souls who would “take the Kingdom of Heaven by storm.”
John mentions Jesus' disciple who was known unto the High Priest: “And (the disciple) went in with Jesus into the palace of the high priest. But Peter stood at the door without. Then went out that other disciple, which was known unto the High Priest, and spake unto her that kept the door, and brought in Peter.” (John 18:15-16)
By the time Jesus was born there were a number of factors that led to the corruption of Sanhedrin. First, there was the outside influence of the Romans. Herod, for example, had killed members of the Sanhedrin who challenged his wicked behavior. He also filled the supreme court with men who were willing to cooperate with his corrupt manner of conducting business. Under the Romans the Sanhedrin more or less adopted a form of political pragmatism to get along with their Roman overlords. In AD 6 Judea was made a Roman province. Under this political situation the Sanhedrin and the high priest were “granted almost exclusive control of the internal affairs of the nation ... and, so long as public order was maintained and tax revenues were forthcoming, they were content for national matter to be under the control of the Jerusalem Sanhedrin. The Sanhedrin had great power but they were always ultimately answerable to the Roman governor. (Brian Schwertley, The Ecclesiastical Trial, Part 2: Before the Sanhedrin , www.reformedonline.com/)
Luke's accurate and relatively abundant knowledge about the Herod family may be due to his acquaintance with certain people who had close contact with the family. He mentions Joanna the wife of one of Antipas's stewards, among the well-to-do women who supported Jesus and his disciples during their itinerant ministry, and his reference to Manaen 'companion' or 'courtier' of Herod, the tetrarch who became one of the leading teachers and prophets in the church of Syrian Antioch about AD 47 is also of interest. Luke must have found in Manaen a valuable informant on the contacts of Antipas and his relatives with the early Christian story.
Manaen is also mentioned in Acts 13:1-3: “Now there were in the church that was at Antioch certain prophets and teachers; as Barnabas, and Simeon that was called Niger, and Lucius of Cyrene, and Manaen, which has ben brought up with Herod the tetrarch, and Saul...” The rulers of the Herod dynasty were brought up in Rome
Shaul-Paul was well connected too
Rufus , the Roman Senator married Priscilla, mother of the Apostle Paul through another marriage. Rufus and Pudens parented Rufus Pudens Pudentianna, Saint Pauls half-brother. Saint Paul, or Paul of Tarsus, is a Christian saint, who has lent his name to a number of places and things: Buildings and institutions Churches St Pauls Cathedral in London, England, designed by Christopher Wren St Pauls Cathedral (Macau) in Macau St Pauls Cathedral, in Melbourne.
Pudens was the husband of Claudia. They were identified with the Pudens and Claudia of Martial’s ‘Epigrams’ (iv. 13, xi. 53), and Claudia was held to be a British maiden and a daughter of a British chief named Cogidubnus (Martial, xi. 53, ‘CIL.’ vii. 11)
King of Siluria, was sainted by the early Church of Britain. "He first of the Cymry gave infants names, for before names were not given except to adults, and then from something characteristic in their bodies, minds, or manners." His brother Linus the Martyr, his sister Claudia and her husband Rufus Pudens aided the Apostle Paul in the Christian Church in Rome, as recorded in II Timothy 4:21 and Romans 16:13 (Rufus Pudens and St. Paul are shown to be half-brothers, with the same mother but different fathers. "His mother and mine." She thus appears to have been the mother of an elder son, Paul, by a Hebrew husband, and a younger son, Rufus, by a second marriage with a Roman Christian.)
Greet Prisca and Aquila, and the household of Onesiphorus. Erastus stayed in Corinth, but Trophimus I have left in Miletus sick. Do your utmost to come before winter. Eubulus greets you, as well as Pudens, Linus, Claudia, and all the brethren. The Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit. Grace be with you. Amen (2 Timothy 4:19-22).
From all this we realize that Paul and Rufus Pudens Pudentius were half-brothers, each having the same mother. In turn, this made the British Princess Gladys, the emperor Claudius' adopted daughter, now known as Claudia Britannica Rufina Pudens Pudentius, sister-in-law the Apostle of the Gentiles! And lastly, through Gladys' adoption, Paul is the half-brother-son-in-law (if there can be such a thing) to the emperor Claudius!
St. Bernard, while gazing upon the glories of the Church, once commented, “Thus, wealth is drawn by ropes of wealth, thus money bringeth money...O vanity of vanities, yet no more vain than insane. The Church is resplendent in her walls, beggarly in her poor. She clothes her stones in gold, and leaves her sons naked.”
Http://www.asis.com/users/stag/royalsoap.html)
Jesus Had a Rich Family with Ties to the Herodians
According to the Gospel of Matthew ( Matthew 27:60), the garden and tomb were the private property of Jesus’ wealthy uncle, Joseph of Arimathea. Some said that Joseph was the uncle of Vigin Mary and therefore of Jesus. He was well placed as Nobilis Decurio, a minister of mines for the Roman empire, with direct access to Pilate himself.
Described as one who was “looking for the kingdom of God,” Mark 15:43. all four Gospels agree that Joseph was a member of the Sanhedrin which is the way bouleutēs, literally "counsellor", in Matthew 27:57 and Luke 23:50 is often interpreted, and a secret disciple of Jesus. (John 19:38) Scholars suggest his private garden and Jesus’ tomb was likely the Garden of Gethsemane, a favorite gathering place of the disciples with a clear view of the Temple on Mount Moriah or Sion (or Zion, the ancient name for Jerusalem).
When Pilate allowed Joseph's request he immediately purchased fine linen (Mark 15:46) and proceeded to Golgotha to take the body down from the cross. There, assisted by Nicodemus, he took the body and wrapped it in the fine linen, sprinkling it with the myrrh and aloes that Nicodemus had brought (John 19:39). Remember, the phoenix “maketh for itself a coffin of frankincense and myrrh and the other spices...” (See Mummy)
It Was Finished Amazingly Fast!
According to the Gospel of Mark, immediately after the Crucifixion Joseph of Arimathea asked Pontius Pilate for Jesus’ body. Pilate was astonished that Jesus is dead so soon (Mk 15:44), it usually took several excruciatingly painful days for the crucified to perish. That was the point.
The Gospels record that Jesus was suspended from the pillar at the sixth hour (noon), at the ninth hour (3 p.m.) he said he thirsted and was given a sponge soaked with vinegar by a Roman centurion (in fulfillment of Psalm 22:16 and Zecharia 12:10). When Jesus received the vinegar, which normally has a reviving effect, Jesus said, “It is finished: and bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.” (John 29:30) By nightfall he was declared dead.
This is where medical doctors see trouble in the story of the Crucifixion. How is it possible, they wonder that a viral and powerful man such as Jesus (the image on the Shroud of Turin is that of man who was about 5’ 10” tall, 165 pounds) could have died so quickly?
Pilate also had reason to be surprised. Jesus’ legs were not even broken, the customary coup de grace which hastened death so that the dead bodies did not remain on the pillars on the Sabbath day. (John 19:31) The breaking of the legs prevented the crucified from straightening out their bodies. This assured suffocation within a few hours. Mallets broke the legs of the thieves. Jesus’ legs were left untouched because he was believed to be dead already. So how come he died so soon?
Pilate conferred on this matter with a Roman centurion who is named Longinus in the apocryphal Book of Nicodemus. According to the Gospel of John, he was the centurion who thrust his lance into the side of Jesus to confirm his death. (John 19:33-35) Blood and water flowed out.
None of the other Gospels mention Longinus’ action or the transformed blood and water of Christ. Yet in the Gospel of John this blood simultaneously verified Jesus was dead and that the faith of Christ is centered in his blood and water.
Longinus became an early hero of the first Christians for his actions that Good Friday in April 2,000 years ago. If Jesus’ legs had been broken his body weight would have crushed his lungs causing him to die from asphyxiation.
Most importantly, if Jesus’ legs had been broken, the prophecy of Exodus 12:46 “… a bone of him shall not be broken” would have been unfulfilled. Some say that in that moment, by his single action, Longinus held the destiny of the world in his hands. When he made the decision to pierce the side of Jesus he altered history.
Short Spear or Sponge?
Longinus the centurion and his Spear are the subject of immense mystery. According to legend, he was nearly blind. In the apocryphal Acta Pilata, Longinus was the supervisor of the Crucifixion.
Christian legend also claims Longinus was a secret follower of Jesus. He is the same centurion who, transformed by the events that transpired at the Crucifixion, praised Jesus as the true Son of God (Mk. 15:39)
He was also the centurion who confirmed the death of Jesus to Pilate, and who then released the body of Jesus to another of Jesus’ secret disciples, Joseph of Arimathea. It has even been suggested that Longinus was the Roman soldier who administered the ‘vinegar’ to Jesus.
In their carefully researched work, The Jesus Conspiracy. The Turin Shroud and the Truth about the Resurrection. (1994, pp.252-3) Holger Kersten and Elmar Gruber note that an error of translation was made when the word hyssos (‘short spear’) was taken for hyssopos (‘hyssop’). Through this error it is revealed that, instead of a spear, Longinus held up a sponge soaked in a narcotic substance that put Jesus into a catatonic state, giving him the appearance of death.
Body or Corpse?
The trouble with the description of Longinus’ piercing Jesus’ side and the blood spurting out is that it is medically impossible. Corpses do not bleed. In order for blood to spurt out Jesus would have had to be at least partially alive. Additionally, it has been argued for centuries that Longinus’ piercing and the wound it caused was not sufficient to kill Jesus. The wounds that appear on the body in the Shroud of Turin tend to support this. So, the question continues to be asked: is the Gospel of John indicating that Jesus was still alive after the Crucifixion?
Dead Sea Scroll scholar Hugh Schonfield The Passover Plot. A New Interpretation of Life and Death of Jesus (1965 p.168), and the authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail (p.329) note that in the original Greek version of Mark’s Gospel, when Joseph asks for Jesus’ body he uses the word soma -- a word they propose applied to a living body. Pilate responds in the affirmative, but uses the word ptoma -- which means “corpse.”
This is a perplexing state of affairs. Given the two different words, soma and ptoma, did Joseph receive a living or a dead body? This is the vital question of Christianity. 1 Corinthinians asks “If Christ be not risen, then is our preaching in vain, and your faith is also vain?”
John’s Gospel says that, along with Nicodemus, Joseph pulled Jesus’ mangled body from the pillar. Without the knowledge or involvement of any of the other apostles they rushed the body to Joseph’s garden and went immediately to work. The two men treated the open cuts and wounds with a sticky gel made from over 100 pounds of aloe, myrrh and other medicinal herbs. They wrapped his body in a linen shroud, and placed it in Joseph’s private tomb, sealing it with a large rolling rock. Were they preparing Jesus’ body for burial or healing the massive wounds?
Joseph came from Arimathea near the Samarian border. He returned there after the Crucifixion, suggesting he lived there.
The question thus arises:
Why is Joseph’s family burial tomb in Jerusalem?
Especially in a location so conveniently located to the site of Jesus’ Crucifixion?
Was his burial place located there because Joseph considered Jerusalem sacred?
Or, knowing that Jesus’ execution was imminent, unavoidable and indeed necessary for the fulfillment of prophecy, was this site’s proximity to the site of the Crucifixion pre-selected as part of an elaborate conspiracy for as a recovery area?
Arimathea is often held to be another name for Ramathaim-Zophim in Ephraim, the birth-place of Samuel, where David came to Samuel. (1 Sam. 1:1, 19), Others identify it with Ramlah in Dan, or Ramah in Benjamin. (Matt. 2:18)
Josephus mentions that one of his former colleagues who, after his intervention with Titus, was brought down from the cross survived.
Gospel of Nicodemus
The Gospel of Nicodemus, a text appended to the Acts of Pilate, provides additional, though even more mythologized, details. After Joseph asked for the body of Christ from Pilate, and prepared the body with Nicodemus' help, Christ's body was delivered to a new tomb that Joseph had built for himself. In the Gospel of Nicodemus, the Jewish elders express anger at Joseph for burying the body of Christ in the following exchange:
And likewise Joseph also stepped out and said to them: Why are you angry against me because I begged the body of Jesus? Behold, I have put him in my new tomb, wrapping in clean linen; and I have rolled a stone to the door of the tomb. And you have acted not well against the just man, because you have not repented of crucifying him, but also have pierced him with a spear.
—Gospel of Nicodemus. Translated by Alexander Walker.
The “Betrayal” Induced by Theological Argument
The apocryphal Gospel of Judas reads:
“But you will exceed all of them. For you will sacrifice the man that clothes me.. Already your horn has been raised, your wrath has been kindled, your star has shown brightly, and your heart has […]. [57]
“Truly […] your last […] become [----about two and a half lines missing----], grieve [----about two lines missing----] the ruler, since he will be destroyed. And then the image of the great generation of Adam will be exalted, for prior to heaven, earth, and the angels, that generation, which is from the eternal realms, exists. Look, you have been told everything. Lift up your eyes and look at the cloud and the light within it and the stars surrounding it. The star that leads the way is your star.”
“No one can show greater love than by laying down his life for his friends.” (John 15:13) “We have learnt to know what love is from this – that Christ laid down his life on our behalf, and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren.” (1 John 3:16)
The apocryphal Syrian Acts of Thomas declare that Thomas was Jesus' twin brother, and that his full name was Judas Tammuz or Judas Thomas.
The Qur'an insists that Judas had the same face as Jesus and was crucified in his place. A servant of Jesus Christ and brother of James authored the New Testament epistle of Jude (short for Judas). James was Jesus' brother. Does this make Judas Jesus' twin brother Thomas as the Syrian and The Gospel of Thomas insist?
Two French priests Sauniere and Baudet at the beginning of the century filled the Church bof Mary Magdalene at Rennes-Le-Chateau with a collection of religious statues and paintings. The 14 Stations of the Cross are depicted, each one slightly or entirely twisted from its “official” meaning. For instance one shows a Scotsman in kilts observing the crucifixion. Another, even more powerful depiction, shows two thieves carrying an alive, but unconscious, Jesus from his burial tomb under moonlight.
Caesar's Decree - c. 50 C.E.
"A stone slab found in Nazareth, of height 0.61m is inscribed (in Greek) with a decree demanding the death penalty for anyone who broke the seals on a tomb or stole a dead body." (Attributed date c. 50 C.E.)
- Summarized extract - IVP Three Volume Bible Dictionary (under section for Nazareth)
"It is my pleasure that graves and tombs remain undisturbed in perpetuity for those who have made them for the cult of their ancestors, or children, or members of their house. If, however, any man lay information that another has either demolished them, or has in any other way extracted the buried, or has maliciously transferred them to other places in order to wrong them, or has displaced the sealing or other stones, against such a one I order that a trial be instituted, as in respect of the gods, so in regard to the cult of mortals. For it shall be much more obligatory to honour the buried. Let it be absolutely forbidden for anyone to disturb them. In the case of contravention I desire that the offender be sentenced to capital punishment on charge of violation of sepulture."
- Ordinance of Caesar
“Early on the first day of the week, while it was still dark, Mary Magdalene went to the tomb and saw that the stone had been removed from the entrance...At this she turned around and saw Jesus standing there, but she did not realize that it was Jesus...Thinking that he was the gardener she said, “Sir, if you have carried him away, tell me where you have put him and I will get him.” (John 20:1-18). The Hebrew biography of Jesus Toledot Yeshu mentions Judah the Gardener, a personage corresponding to Judas Iscariot.
Significantly, Matthew devotes rather fewer words to the fabulous resurrection than to rebutting the idea that the disciples had simply stolen the body – a tale obviously popular among the Jews when the fable was written (“This saying has been spread abroad among the Jews up to this very day” - 28:15)
A Few paragraphs from the book THE JESUS FAMILY TOMB. The Discovery, the Investigation, and the Evidence That Could Change History. Simcha Jacobovici and Charles Oellegrino. Foreword by James Cameron. HarperSanFrancisco 2007
Ossuary of St. Peter
(Father Bellarmino Bagatti (1905-90) held a chair at the Studium Biblicum Franciscanum in Jerusalem, where he taught, studied, wrote, and worked. Besides being a Franciscan monk, Father Bagatti, an Italian by birth, was also an accomplished archaeologist).
In 1953 the Franciscans were renovating their Church at Dominus Flevit (“the Lord Wept”) on the Mount of Olives, overlooking the Temple Mount. It was here, that Jesus saw the Temple of Jerusalem and wept for what he believed was its forthcoming destruction. The name of the Hindu god 'Rudra' means a weeping god.
One might have thought that the Church would have backed Bagatti, but there were two problems with his finds, neither of them having to do with archaeology. First of all, Bagatti was unearthing the remains of the very people the Church fathers called heretics. Hardly a reason to celebrate them. Second of all, there was a particularly distracting find at Dominus Flevit: Bagatti had identified what was arguably the ossuary of St. Peter.
For years, the Vatican has been digging under St. Peter's Basilica in Rome, looking for evidence that St. Peter is actually buried there, as per tradition. Sure enough, there is an ancient Roman cemetery under St. Peter's, but it is a pagan cemetery. There is not one shred of credible archaeological evidence linking the cemetery under the Vatican with the apostle Peter.
The earliest record placing Linus as the first Bishop after Peter was from Irenaeus in ~180 AD, more than 100 years later. Irenaeus was an apologist for the church who defended "apostlic succession". Unfortunately, no other records before that time even mention Linus. Tertullian, who lived during the same time as Irenaeus, wrote that the first Bishop was actually Clement I, and doesn't even mention Linus.
www.archelaos.com/popes/details.aspx?id=2
stmaryscathedral.ca/stlinus/saintlinus.html
The Lost Tomb of Jesus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Lost Tomb of Jesus is a documentary co-produced and first broadcast on the Discovery Channel and Vision TV in Canada on March 4, 2007 covering the discovery of the Talpiot Tomb. It was directed by Canadian documentary and film maker Simcha Jacobovici and produced by Felix Golubev and Ric Esther Bienstock, while James Cameron served as executive producer. The film has been released in conjunction with a book about the same subject, The Jesus Family Tomb, issued in late February 2007 and co-authored by Jacobovici and Charles R. Pellegrino. The documentary and book's claims are currently the subject of controversy within the archaeological and theological fields, as well as among linguistic and biblical scholars.
The tomb was discovered in 1980 during a housing construction project. Ten ossuaries were found in the cave, including the six that are the subject of Jacobovici's film. However, one of the ten ossuaries went missing years ago, presumably stolen.
"In their movie they are billing it as 'never before reported information,' but it is not new. I published all the details in the Antiqot journal in 1996, and I didn't say it was the tomb of Jesus' family," said Amos Kloner, now professor of archaeology at Israel's Bar-Ilan University and author of the original excavation report for the predecessor of the Israel Antiquities Authority.[1]
"I think it is very unserious work. I do scholarly work…," Kloner said. "[This film] is all nonsense."[1]
Ossuary inscriptions
Six of the nine remaining ossuaries have inscriptions. The other three ossuaries have no inscriptions. The Lost Tomb of Jesus posits that three of the ossuaries with inscriptions bear the names of figures from the New Testament.[5] The actual meanings of the epigraphs are disputed.[6] The makers of the documentary claim that four leading epigraphers have corroborated their interpretation of the inscriptions.[7] As translated in The Lost Tomb of Jesus and The Jesus Family Tomb, they read as follows:
Yeshua bar Yehosef, Aramaic for "Jesus son of Joseph"
Maria, written in Aramaic script, but a Latin form of the Hebrew name "Miriam" ("Mary")[8]
Yose, a diminutive of "Joseph" mentioned (in its Greek form ιωσης "Joses") as the name of one of Jesus's brothers in the New Testament (Mark 6:3)
Yehuda bar Yeshua, Possibly Aramaic for "Judah son of Jesus"
Mariamene e Mara. According to the filmmakers this is Greek for "Mary known as the master." The similar name "Mariamne" is found in the Acts of Philip: Francois Bovon, professor of the history of religion at Harvard University has suggested based on his study of that work that Mariamene, or Mariamne, was the actual name of Mary Magdalene[8]
Matya, Hebrew for 'Matthew'—not claimed to be Matthew the Evangelist but "possibly a husband of one of the women in an unmarked ossuary."[7]. The filmmakers claim that there is evidence that Mary mother of Jesus had many relatives named Matthew[8]
Four leading epigraphers have corroborated the ossuary inscriptions for The Lost Tomb of Jesus, according to the Discovery Channel.[9] William G. Dever, a retired professor of archaeology at the University of Arizona who has been excavating ancient sites in Israel for 50 years, said that some of the inscriptions on the Talpiot ossuaries are unclear, but that all of the names are common.[10]
The author of The Jesus Dynasty The Hidden History of Jesus, His Royal Family, and the Birth of Christianity. (Simon & Schuster. 2006) was puzzled by a strange logo over the entrance to the tomb showing a circle within a compass. Identical logo stands for the Berlin Grand Masonic Lodge. Let me add a few comments on that.
In about 1103 B.C. Aeneas’s son Brutus migrated and reestablished his group in “the Great White Island” and built a capital city he named New Troy, now called London. The great patron of the Masons Henry IV informs his scholar that the Mystery was brought into England by Peter Gower (i.e. Pythagoras). The first British martyr St. Alban was at the same time Grand Master of the Masons appointed to the post by the Emperor in A.D. 300. In the Philosophical Origins of Gentile Theology Newton describes Jesus as “one of these prophets sent to call mankind back to the truth of the Pythagorean heliocentrism.” The Athenian orator Isokrates (4th century B.C.) observed: “On a visit to Egypt Pythagoras became a student of the religion of the people” That's why Giordano Bruno argued that Copernican heliocentrism should encourage Christians to convert to ancient Egyptian religion. (See also R.H. Brown, Stellar Theology and Masonic Astronomy. New York 1882, p. 31)
Freemasonry still contains a degree of initiation described as the ‘Rose Arch’, and it is in the light of this that the Constitution of Freemasons published in 1723 can be more fully understood. The admission of a new brother is prefaced by the following declaration: “Adam our first parent, created after the image of God, the great Architect of the Universe, must have had the liberal sciences, particularly Geometry (i.e. masonry), written on his heart for ever since the Fall we find the Principles of it in the heart of his offspring.”
Frontispiece to Europe. This work, often described (but not titled by Blake) as the "Ancient of Days", shows an old bearded man, Urizen, using a huge pair of compass to delineate the material world at the moment of creation. This is a Gnostic interpretation of the creation story where a demiurge (a subordinate deity) rather than a benevolent God is the Creator. He sees this moment of creation as rational order being imposed on chaos. The same idea was expressed in the Gospel of John's Logos. In a 13th century depiction of Christ Jesus as the Divine Word (Logos), the Sacred Utterance that brings forth all things into existence, he is displayed with the Compass and Universe in his hand making him the Grand Architect of the Universe. Blake's Newton also imposes order on chaos by compass. Remember Honi the circle drawer making rain by drawing circles? Possibly he was a Platonist who believed that God always geometrizes. He was stoned by the Jews.
Jesus a Stonemason
The traditional English translation “carpenter” which goes back as early as William Tyndale's 1526 edition of the NY, is misleading. The Greek word tekton is a more generic term referring to a “builder.” It can include one who works with wood, but in its 1st-century Galilean context it more likely refers to a stone worker. The 2nd-century Protoevangelium of James refers to Joseph as a “builder of buildings.” Houses and buildings were built of stone. Wood was used sparingly, mostly for roof beams and doors, since wood was a scarce building material in the rocky terrain of Palestine. Jesus often drew upon images of stone building to illustrate his teachings. In one of his well-known stories he speaks of the wise man who in building a house digs a deep foundation and lays the solid stone foundation of the building upon bedrock (Lk 6:48). He appears to have been exposed to the building trades, and stonework of some type was most likely his trade.
In the mid-Victorian period it was socially important, almost essential, for a professional man to be a Freemason. The nouveaux riches of the industrial revolution sought social status through membership of an exclusive society that had a high profile amongst aristocrats of all levels, right up to the royal family itself. In theory at least, members of the working classes were equally eligible to become Masons but in practice it would hardly enter their heads to ask to join bosses ‘club’, so the Lodge has long been associated with the well-to-do. Those at all levels of society who were not Freemasons could only speculate about the secrets revealed to members of this mysterious organization. They were known to wear aprons and large collars and rumored to roll up their trousers and exchange strange handshakes, while whispering passwords to each other. (2) The only absolute requirement of membership is a belief in God…any god. Governor of the Universe (God – described in a neutral way so that He is equally accessible to members of any monotheistic religion) (Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas, The Hiram Key. Pharaohs, Freemasons and the Discovery of the Secret Scrolls of Jesus. 1996)
Which means that as a stonemason Jesus could even claim that he inherited his royal blood from his forefather David.
A sepulchre recently excavated in Rome, under the basilica of the Apostles, which belonged to people who particularly liked to call themselves the Innocenti, or Innocents was adorned with paintings of a somewhat unusual character – with scenes of initiation and of funerals. One symbol in particular, the ascia, or masons' trowel, which was an emblem much used by the Essenians and Pythagoreans, was represented there. (Carcopino, Le Mystèere d'un symbol chrétien)
Jerusalem vs. Rome
Rosemary R. Ruether in his article Anti-Semitism In Christian Theology (Theology Today – Vol. 30, No.4 - January 1974) wrote: “Anti-Semitism in Christianity cannot be dealt with either as an accidental and non-intrinsic accretion or as the product of purely sociological conflicts between the church and the synagogue. At its root, anti-semitism develops in Christianity from theological anti-Judaism. Anti-Judaism in Christian theology stands as the left hand of Christology. The church wished to prove that Jesus was the Christ of the Jewish messianic promise as found in the Jewish Scriptures This demanded a polemic against the ongoing Jewish hermeneutical tradition which denied this interpretation. This denial evoked a response from Christianity designed to show that Judaism, which rejects Jesus' messianic status, itself stands in a rejected status, and so its teaching authority on this subject can be totally discredited. It is from this nexus between Christological and anti-Judaic midrash that we find that intimate union in Christianity between “faith and fratricide”.
The story of Romulus and Remus is the foundation myth of Rome and contrasts very strongly with the advanced morality of the Hebrew foundation myth of Abraham and Isaac. Romulus and Remus were twin brothers who together founded the city of Rome. Their divine parentage and their upbringing by a she-wolf emphasize the utterly new start that they made; they were as if created by nature and were at dawn of a new world. While they were working on the foundations of the city, they quarrelled over the plans. Remus jumped in derision over a trench that Romulus had dug, and in anger, Romulus slew him. Nevertheless, he was not punished for the deed, but on the contrary was given a great sign of favor by the gods: a flight of vultures arose over him, showing that he would found a nation as strong and pitiless as the vulture.
The purpose of the story of Abraham and Isaac is to show that God Himself ordained that animal sacrifice should be substituted for human sacrifice.. By showing that, in the supreme moment of crisis (the actual foundation of the nation), the sacrifice was abrogated, no excuse was left for its reinstitution in any lesser emergency. The founding of the nation and the abrogation of human sacrifice are associated together in a manner that is decisive. In the Abraham-Isaac story as we have it in the Bible, the double aim is secured by having a father willing to sacrifice, but merciful God who forgoes the sacrifice, allowing the substitution of an animal.
What survived from the heritage of idolatry which in Judaism remained peripheral grew to become dominant in the Christian world. Old houses pulled down in England and on the continent are frequently found to have the body of a cat walled up in them. Christian legends tell of monks buried alive under monasteries (e.g. Oran, a companion of Columba, in Iona). In Oldenburg, it is reported that Children were buried alive as late as the 17th century to make the dikes secure.
The first gladiatorial combats were introduced by the Bruti upon the death of their father (264 BC) to take the place of the human sacrifices of slaves previously made to appease the ghosts of the dead (see Valerius Maximus, II, 4, 7) The notion that homicide cannot be commuted is the foundation of criminal law in the Bible: human life is invaluable, hence incommutable. This concept is not found in any other law corpus in the ancient Near East (see Genesis Rabba 22. 12)
The Proto-Gospel According to Philo of Alexandria
The first revolutionary basic idea in Christianity, borrowed from the Philonic school, was that by the one great voluntary sacrifice of a mediator the sins of all times and all men was atoned for once for all - in respect of the faithful. Thus the necessity for any further sacrifices was removed and with it the basis for a multitude of religious rites. In spite of this the habit of sacrifice was so deeply rooted in the customs of peoples that Catholicism - which borrowed so much from paganism - found it appropriate to accommodate itself to this fact by the introduction of at least the symbolical sacrifice of the mass, which John Knox called idolatry. On the other hand, there is no trace whatever of the dogma of original sin.
Support for this belief Philo found in the 5rd chapter of Isaiah, v. 12 where the Prophet speaks of God's suffering servant, who “bare sin of many”. But such concepts cannot be found in the Hebrew Tanakh, but only in the corrupted Greek translation Septuagint, which is the Essene corruption of the Jewish Scriptures. The same Septuagint inspired Paul's gospel about Christ's death for sin and his rising on the third day (Kata tas graphas, 1 Cor 15:3 and 4.)
Philonism became the greatest source of evangelic theological-philosophical fundament. And possibly this fact explain the telling verse of Apocalypse: “And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.” (Some manuscripts read “their Lord”) – Rev. 11:8.
Interestingly, Philo in his book Agaiunst Flaccus (chapter 6-9) writing in the days of Agrippa, about 40 A.D., tells us that the mob at Alexandria dressed up a crazy old man, putting a sham crown on his head, a scepter in his hand, and a purple robe over his body, and hailed him as Karrabas an obvious miswriting for Barabbas, and as Maris, the Syrian word for a royal personage. Other Jews were crucified for opposing the erection of the statues of the Emperor Caius Caligula in Jewish synagogues of Alexandria. Roman governor of Alexandria Flaccus issued a notice in which he called Jews foreigners and aliens...allowing any one who was inclined to proceed to exterminate the Jews as prisoners of war.
Let me remind here that Moses actually taught the substitution of a lamb for the firstborn son (Ex 34:20): “All the first-born of thy sons thou shall redeem (with a lamb)” Prophet Micah plainly witnesses that no external work, how excellent ever it be, does purge or make satisfaction for sin: “Shall I give my first-born son for expiation of mine iniquity, or the fruit of my womb a sin offering for my soul?” (Micah 6:6-7)
Philo's knowledge of Jewish Law, including Midrash, was extensive, but departed in many significant ways from rabbinic traditions, and that explains why he was never mentioned in any early Jewish source. His thought had no influence on Jewish thinking. The first Jewish thinker to revive interest in Philo was Azariah dei Rossi during the period of the Renaissance when neo-paganism was rampant.
In the Christian religion the belief developed that the story of Isaac's binding was a foreshadowing of the sacrifice of Jesus, whom Christians believe was God's only son and simultaneously God Himself, and who gave up his life so that sins could be forgiven. There is a tradition that the site of the binding of Isaac, Moriah, was also the city of Jesus's future crucifixion, i.e. Jerusalem. However no archaeological or historical evidence supports this assertion.
Another instance of human sacrifice mentioned in the Bible is the sacrifice of Jephthah's daughter in Judges chapter 11. Jephthah vows to sacrifice to God whatsoever comes to greet him at the door when he returns home if he is victorious. The vow is stated in Judges 11:31 as "Then it shall be, that whatsoever cometh forth of the doors of my house to meet me, when I return in peace from the children of Ammon, shall surely be the Lord's, and I will offer it up for a burnt offering." When he returns from battle, his virgin daughter runs out to greet him. That he actually does sacrifice her is shown in verse 11:39, "And it came to pass at the end of two months, that she returned unto her father, who did with her according to his vow which he had vowed". This example seems to be the exception rather than the rule, however, as the verse continues "And she was a virgin. From this comes the Israelite custom that each year the young women of Israel go out for four days to commemorate the daughter of Jephthah the Gileadite." The lamentations that were offered annually in remembrance of this act frame it as the atrocity it was, and accentuate the grievousness of such a rash action. According to commentators of the rabbinic Jewish tradition this was a gross violation of God's law, and this part of the Bible illustrates the terrible tragedy of human sacrifice. The majority of the early Christian Church Fathers saw the sacrifice of Jepthah's virgin daughter as foreshadowing, like Isaac, the death of Jesus Christ not least because Jepthah's vow in the biblical account was made whilst under the influence of the Holy Spirit (Judges 11:29).
In the Bible the "wise king Solomon" is portrayed as "whoring after" the Tyrian fire and sun god Moloch/Molech/Baal. In reality, the ancient Israelites abandoned YHWH and worshiped many gods, including Moloch, to whom their children were immolated. In fact, the priesthood of Moloch is that of Melchizedek ("Righteous Moloch"), a mythical character who in the Bible is given authority over not only Abraham but Jesus. Hence, the cult of Moloch is to reign supreme behind the scenes.
In Jeremiah 19:5-6 we read, “They have built also the high places of Baal, to burn their sons with fire for burnt offerings unto Baal which I commended not, nor spake it, neither came it into my mind: Therefore.... this place shall no more be called Tophet, nor the valley of the son of Hinnom, but the valley of slaughter.”
Christianity has its high priest, “a priest forever, after the order of Melchizedek.” A new and different priesthood arose, for Jesus was of the tribe of Judah, and in his becoming a priest, the line of Levi and Aaron was set aside. That a new covenant had come into being is evident from God's oath, “Thou art a priest forever.” Melchizedek, like Christ, was without a father or a mother or a genealogy. Here Hebrews is protesting against the genealogies in Matthew and Luke. But a similar sentiment is found in another late writing, 1 Timothy 1:4 (“Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies...”) and the latest of the Four Gospels avoids the genealogy. The Jewish priests, being mortal, were not perfect.
The name “Cannibal” (cahna Baal) is another word which means “Baal Priest.” “He who eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life” (John 6:53) Jesus lost many disciples who were offended by this remark (John 6:66) because they thought he was now creating another cult of human sacrifice and cannibalism.
According to modern Gnostics Melchizedek assists in the evolution of the world and also the evolution of not only the earth but the entire universe. “Fear not of moving forward as I am here to guide you to the light of Evolution. I AM Melchizedek”. In the Gnostic literature Melchizedek is “without father or mother, of no known generation ... without end of life ...priest for eternity. In other words, he was a child of St. Thomas Aquinas's generatio aequivoca (abiogenesis). In fact, in the Gnostic Gospel of God according to the Egyptians “Christ the divine Autogenesis created everything.” (www.gnostics.com/gospel.html)
Adam von Bremen recorded human sacrifices to Odin in 11th century Sweden; in the holy groves of Uppsala, men were sacrificed by being hung up on the sacred trees. According to the Ynglinga saga, king Domalde was sacrificed there in the hope to bring greater future harvests and the total domination of all future wars. The same saga also relates that Domalde's descendant king Aun sacrificed nine of his own sons to Odin in exchange for longer life, until the Swedes stopped him from sacrificing his last son, Egil. Odin or Wotan was a Nordic Moloch.
The theory that Jesus did not die on the cross, but arranged his own simulated death, has been around for at least two hundred years – and has given rise to discussions just as long as. In German, the theory was called Die Scheintodt-Hypothese, in English the Swoon Theory. The person who came to be most associated with the theory from the beginning was the German theologian, H.E.G. Paulus. In three works, published from 1800 to 1842, Paulus put a great deal of effort into interpreting all the miracles described in the New Testament by providing them with natural explanations. Paulus who was a rationalist like Reimarus, embraced the moral and spiritual content of Jesus' teachings and deeds, but considered that all the miracles that were described had rational explanations. And, as regards the crucifixion – and above all that Jesus rose again and showed himself alive – HEG Paulus thought that the simplest explanation for this was that Jesus never actually died on the cross, but was taken down alive, albeit unconscious.
The Swoon Theory lives on into our own days. Among the twentieth-century authors who, in one form or another, have put forward this theory, one can note George Moore, Frank Harris, Ernest Brougham Docker, D.H. Lawrence, Robert Graves and Joshua Podero, Hugh J. Schonfield, Donovanm Joyce, J.D.M Derret, Holger Kersten and Elmaqr R. Gruber, Michael Baigent, Richard Leighg and Henry Lincoln,. Barbara Thiering, Gerald Messadie and Helmer Linderholm.
According to modern Gnostics Melchizedek assists in the evolution of the world and also the evolution of not only the earth but the entire universe. “Fear not of moving forward as I am here to guide you to the light of Evolution. I AM Melchizedek”. In the Gnostic literature Melchizedek is “without father or mother, of no known generation ... without end of life ...priest for eternity. In other words, he was a child of St. Thomas Aquinas's generatio aequivoca (abiogenesis). In fact, in the Gnostic Gospel of God according to the Egyptians “Christ the divine Autogenesis created everything.” (www.gnostics.com/gospel.html)
Adam von Bremen recorded human sacrifices to Odin in 11th century Sweden; in the holy groves of Uppsala, men were sacrificed by being hung up on the sacred trees. According to the Ynglinga saga, king Domalde was sacrificed there in the hope to bring greater future harvests and the total domination of all future wars. The same saga also relates that Domalde's descendant king Aun sacrificed nine of his own sons to Odin in exchange for longer life, until the Swedes stopped him from sacrificing his last son, Egil. Odin or Wotan was a Nordic Moloch.
Paul Wiser than Jesus
Paul discovered what till then had been hidden from all the wise, Jesus included, that in and through Adam all have sinned: so he argued that “As by one man's disobedience many were made sinner, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous (Rom. 5:19). “For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even in Christ shall all be made alive (I Cor 15:21-22)
Therefore, according to Paul, Jesus saved us by dying for our sins. His death was the act of salvation: he gave himself as a ransom. Notice, however, according to Paul, Jesus died not, however, for everybody, but for those only who believed in him. I sure would not have wanted to live in the firs century, say, Poland, because if I had, according to Paul, the chance of the news of Yeshua's death for my sin surely most likely would not have arrived in Poland in time for my consideration
As if that was not enough, one finds that such necessary tenants in Pauline theology for Eternal Life were lifts straight out of pagan religions. It was this clever synthesis on Paul's doctrines patterned after pagan religious doctrines throughout the world that guaranteed the ease of the spread of Gentile Christianity as well as the ease of catholic Church's worldwide acceptance of Paul's Gospel since it had a little bit of something from everywhere which almost everyone who heard it was somewhat familiar.
Paul limits “salvation” to his gospel and to only those who “believed in it”. This limitation was obviously necessary, or there would have been no further need for Paul or his gospel. Salvation, therefore, was made conditional on belief in the gospel of Paul. The true and conflicting gospel of Yeshua, the Jew, was not taught by Paul. This is astounding but in all of Paul's writings he mentions only 2 of Yeshua's teachings, and after doing that, Paul is quick to bring his own interpretation on the matter as if we needed it. According to Paul, mankind were still in their sins, notwithstanding the ransom; but by “believing” and by “baptism” anybody could bring himself within the operation of this “new dispensation”. This is where “faith” came in, and explains the necessity for the strangest of all doctrines, that faith counts for more than works (“creed” counts more than “deed”). The whole business remains in the hands of the Church. Not the Jewish Law and the deeds induced by it, but the Church Faith and no deeds. All is allowed and it is a priest who absolves every crime
Cicero, the father of the American Democracy
Cicero, in his recipe for the ideal state, reacted strongly against democracy: “My granting the people the freedom to vote is so managed that the possession and use of political power shall be in hands of men of goodwill (boni, i.e. People of the upper class; according to American political dogma the men with means always will win election)...so that liberty may consist in th very fact that the people are given an opportunity of honorably gaining the favor of those men.”
Cicero maintained that that the importance of religion was political, residing in its power to keep the multitude under control, to prevent social chaos, and to promote patriotic feeling (Cp. Patriot Act)
The same two themes, of subsidized food and amusements (sitcoms) recur very often on the imperial coinage, as ever larger sums were spent on these items. Though the Baths were good for the bodies of the “free” Roman people, their exclusion from government and their dependence on largesses and an often horrible amusements degrade their minds. What was said of Heine is true of Juvenal: “as much as he hated an arbitrary absolutism, he hated equally the pettiness of mind which is bred among the people.” Seneca, like Cicero, loves humanity, yet is not fond of the malodorous crowd. According to Epictetus, the philosopher would be well advised to shun ordinary people until he himself has his own elevated principles firmly fixed within him: “remember that the man who brushes up against someone covered with soot cannot help getting some soot on himself.”
When we read this, from one of the most enlightened of pagan philosophers, it is possible to grasp the excitement in which, at the same epoch, increasing numbers were reading what Matthew Gospel had said about Jesus, who “when he saw the multitudes, was moved with compassion on them, because they fainted, and were scattered abroad, as sheep having no shepherd.”
No comments:
Post a Comment