http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/150090
Sarkozy Tells French Jews: I Stand with Israel
French President Nicolas Sarkozy meets French Jews, tells them he is committed to the State of Israel.
Elad Benari
French President Nicolas Sarkozy told French Jews this week that his country “is at the forefront of the struggle against the Iranian nuclear weapon” and reiterated his “commitment and his friendship” towards Israel, the European Jewish Press is reporting.
Sarkozy reportedly made the remarks during a lunch at the Elysee Palace on Wednesday with a delegation of CRIF, the umbrella representative group of French Jewish organizations.
CRIF President Richard Prasquier told EJP that the discussion, which was also attended by French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe, was “very friendly and very open.”
Prasquier noted that Sarkozy addressed the Iraninan issue, and said that France will always stand with Israel if its security is threatened, but voiced his opposition to a military operation “whose consequences would be harmful.”
Sarkozy made similar remarks a few weeks ago, saying that “if Israel’s existence will be threatened, France will not stand by and ignore it.”
The French President added that he sent a letter to leaders of several countries in which he stressed the need to implement tougher sanctions against Iran, especially targeting Iran’s central bank financial flows and calling for an embargo on Iranian oil products.
Sarkozy also addressed the recent embarrassing incident in which he was caught calling Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu a ‘liar’ in a conversation with President Barack Obama.
According to Prasquier, the President said that his very old friendship for Israel “cannot be questioned,” stressing that “no French president has had such sympathy for Israel.” Sarkozy also spoke of “his relation of friendship and respect” with Netanyahu, even if there are “significant differences” between them.
“He considers that Netanyahu had not taken enough initiatives,” Prasquier told EJP.
He noted that the French leader also recalled his recent address to the UN General Assembly, in which he said he favors granting the Palestinian Authority a UN “non member” status but “not under any conditions.”
According to Sarkozy, the PA should recognize that Israel is the state of the Jewish people, start bilateral negotiations, accept the security constraints of Israel and formally commit to not take legal action against it.
G. Grass writes a poem
The Symbol of the Latin Christianity
Guenther Grass in 1944
The Passion inspired by M. Gibson's movie
Christian Communism Logo
Che Guevara and Castro meet
Benedict XVi and Castro meet
The Geocentric Dome of Dome of 13th century Bibi-Heybat Mosque
Azeri Language
Lars Vilks, Jesus-pedophile
Benedict XVi kissing sheikh
K. Wojtyla's Ordination as imam-bishop Cracow 1958
Body-soul (Cp. Paul's Spiritual body). Be ready for cosmic journey!
Bonestell-Landing on the Moon
Lunar-lander
Vishnu
Vishnu as Buddha in the sun and Greek Nature
Baal, Shiva, Aten, Odin - Greek god of Nature
The same greenish Hue
The same greenish Hue
Trident Jesus
Angel Gabriel and Virgin Mary
The Darwinian struggle for Survival at theVatican
The Most Learned canon of Ermland
Hegemonikon or the Ruler of von Lauchen's Heliocentrism
A Graphic Rendition of Copernicus's Book
Such circles deceived Copernicus into believing in heliocentrism
Death of Nicolaus Copernicus
Aisha Qaddafi seeks asylum in Israel
The Committee of 300 or British CHEKA
Black SS-Pope
Pope John Paul II's 'Breviary'
Workers-priests
Communist Pope
Superhubris
Very Evil Pope
Lethal Mix AIDS and Alkoholism
Theology of the Body or by boobs and by crux
Theology of the Body or from Palestine with Love
Justin Martyr: Jesus is an erected phallus, like Egyptian Min
The Phallic Mosque in Jerusalem
Symbol of Islam
Karl Marx monument viewed from back looks like a phallus
Hittite, Phoenician, Kassi cult of the Sun and Cross
The Nicene, evolving cat of Massachussetts
The Nicene Jesus in Trinity
UNSC rejects Palestine's bid for membership
An Italian Poster on the funeral day of pope JP2
Swastika - the Perennial symbol of sun gods
Allah is the sun god. He is Mar Alah, or the sun god Surya
Ethereal body in Hindu religion
Saint Paul, an ancient klansman
Obama, the Enabler
Qaddafi's Corpse
OccupyAurora Protest in Sankt Petersburg
The relics of John Paul II in Odessa
The Afghan Crucifix: Jesus died al kiddush ha-Shem
Wernher, shoot him down
Death to Assad
Nazi and fascist Dictators
Farrakhan with Rev. Pfleger
M. Gibson receives a honorary degree from a Catholic Notre Dame University
The Hate Propaganda sposored by theVatican
Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon to me wishing me a happy New Year
Enough is enough
Baal, Ashera with the pagan symbol of Trinity
Jesus with the Pagan Symbol of Trinity
Putin meets Hu Jintao Oct. 12, 2011
Paul and Nancy
The Kurds in Syria demand an independen state of their own
A. Hitler's letter of 1919 postulating destruction of Jews
Who is Confucius but Moses speaking Chinese?
Yassir Arafat Dying of AIDS
The Aryan, heliocentric Ruler of Canaan
Mussolini, a sculpture by Polish artist S. Szukalski
The Jedwabne Monument in Poland Vandalized
Map of the Indo-British Empire of the Sun
Aria in the Behistun Inscription
Aria on Waldseemuler's map o 1507
Madison Grant's Nordic Theory
Moscow - Beijing Express
A New Huge Free Trade Zone in the Making
The Aryan Christ of the Jesuits
The Cosmic dance of Big Bang
Bestiality in Hinduism
Erotic Artwork on the facade of the Lakshmana temple
Buddhist Solar Trinity
Christian Copy of the Buddhist Solar Trinity
the Marriage of Philology and Mercury
Peter-Mercury in St. Peter's Church
The Geocentric Flag of the African Union
Sundisk from Alacohuyuk (Anatolia)
The True Sexist Palestinian
Kill Jesus
The Symbol of the Aryan Trinity AUM within the sun god Surya
A. Hitler's Historical Jesus under the radiant sun
St. Paul's Golden "Calf"
The Whore of Babylon behind the Holocaust
Behind the Holocaust
Holy Ghost in the shape of swastika
A Christian from the catacombs with swastikas
From Emperor Hadrian to Pope Pius XII
Why did he fail to marry?
Iraq buys Czech fighters
Reversed Evolution of Nebuchadnezzar
The Dying children in Warsaw Ghetto
The Warsaw Ghetto Children
Palestinian Children play in water in Gaza Strip
Ammi Hai
M. Gottlieb: Yom Kippur in the Cracow Alte Shul
Obama Scraps the Global War on Terror
H. Clinton has a Crush on Al Jazeerah
Muslim-Obama
Perfect Together
Comrade
the Muslim Brotherhood Flag
The Quartet's Dream
Picture from national Holocaust Memorial Museum
Cartoon from Gaza
Zuckerberg's Intifada
The darwinian Patron Saint of Palestine
The Palestine mandate Flag with the British solar cross and the sun
Prayer to the sun god at Stonehenge, the Temple of the Druids and Masons
Osama Bin laden Dead
The Pentecost under the sungod Surya instead of YHWH
The United States in Burka
They say, Islam will conquer the world
Hamas Jugend
Fatah 11
The Geocentric Seal of Kansas
The Al-Qaeda SS
The Fathers of Modern Atheism
WikiLeaks Watchers over Democracy
After the WikiLeaks
Russian President to visit Israel in 2011
Business as usual
Picture of an early Christian from the catacombs
Jerusalem The Old City
Tea Party
Swastika Koran
Gorbachev: Victory in Afghanistan is impossible
Deauville Summit Supports the Talks
Statue of Confucius, Father of Chinese geocentrism goes up in Russia
Shimon Peres meets guests from China
the Ice Crystals of Auschwitz
Death Fugue
Anna Chapman, a Russian Spy receiving Top Honor
Al Turki in Bejing
The Spider Net
JFK and W. von Braun, SS Major
http://www.angloisrael.com/
In God We Trust - Tea Party
Tea Party on the Horizon
Give them an ultimatum Sept.16,2010
NYT Cartoon: Expect the worse
Burka
Martyrs Brigaes in action
German Award for the Muhammad Cartoonist
Abbas resembling Einstein
Bushehr nuclear power plant
Iran Inaugurates its first bombing drone
Russian 1800 Engraving dpicting the Whore of babylon, Riding the seven-headed monster
William Blake, The Whore of Babylon
Siege and destruction of Jerusalem
J. Pollard on Jerusalem Wall
Saturday, November 26, 2011
Friday, November 25, 2011
Don't Let Obama off the Hook
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/10899
Don't Let Obama Off the Hook
Occupy Wall Street wants to do just that. They are worried about losing the White House. Eventually, they will shift the blame to the Jews. Some have already done that.
From Ron Jager
The creation of the “Occupy Wall Street” movement is a clear sign that Obama cannot be counted upon by his liberal supporters to be re-elected. The expected loss of the White House by the Democratic Party will most likely enable the Republicans to govern America for the coming decade. This is unacceptable to the Liberal Left, who believe that they and only they are destined to govern America. They claim loudly that they are more intelligent and more able to know what's best for America than their conservative counterparts.
However Obama's continuing ineptness and ineffective decision making concerning the economy has exposed this liberal mantra for what it is, a condescending and hallow believe, as Obama loses major sectors of support among the American public. Month after month as the unemployment rate has continued to defy gravity and keep millions of Americans out of work, President Obama has become the one most associated with the unrelenting deteriorating domestic situation in America.
In marketing terms, Obama has become a declining brand name, he no longer elicits a positive reaction, and has become a Presidential symbol of failure.
Nothing promotes a popular political libel, that is, the propagation of myths, lies and misinformation better than the convergence of interests by the media, the unions, the Liberals, and yes, the Democratic Party. Obama's Liberal supporters, have devised a wholly created "occupy " movement as a diversion tactic that will shift the blame from Obama to Wall Street, to the banks, to the rich, and if it continues long enough, the blame will be eventually shifted to the Jews.
The overall goal is that Obama will no longer be blamed; his credibility will become reminiscent of his status three years ago. The "Occupy Wall Street" movement spreading throughout America to Oakland, New York City, Portland, Los Angelos, Philadelphia, Seattle, Boston, Denver, and Des Moines, just to name a few cities, will be with us for the coming year as the 2012 Presidential election nears. The "Occupy" movement has one goal and only one goal; take the heat off Obama, and shift the blame.
In marketing terms, Obama has become a declining brand name.
There is a consensus that many of the "Occupy" demonstrators marching in the protests are being actively supported by the Democratic Party. Two recent examples are by Reps. Raul Grijalva (D-Arid.) and Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) who said in a joint statement. …“We share the anger and frustration of so many Americans who have seen the enormous toll that an unchecked Wall Street has taken on the overwhelming majority of Americans while benefiting the super wealthy,” and House Democratic Caucus Chairman John Larson (Conn.) who released a statement saying, “The silent masses aren’t so silent anymore. They are fighting to give voice to the struggles that everyday Americans are going through.”
So here we have it, Obama is not to blame they claim, Wall Street is to blame, Obama is a victim of Wall Street, just like us in the "Occupy" movement.
The problem with the Rebranding of Obama will be part and parcel of this campaign as we see the blame being shifted away from Obama. Till now Obama was perceived as a big-government liberal who has expanded regulations, created uncertainty for business and failed to revive the economy, with millions more Americans out of work than when he took office, and an unsteady leader who is unequipped to turn around a country in economic crisis.
Get ready for the new and improved Obama, who will never ask you, are you better off today than you where only four years ago when I was elected ?
Here in Israel we went through a similar period as recently as this past summer with the social protests taking over public parks, in all of Israel's major cities, and holding mass demonstrations. The parks were not only "occupied" but tent cities were established with similar services to what was reported at Zuccotti Park at Wall Street; public kitchens, infirmaries, libraries, and round the clock music and entertainment.
What's in common between our social protects and America's "occupy" movement is not only that they are anti-Democratic in nature, ignoring the will of the voting public, ignoring the rule of law, but they are all funded by umbrella organizations that are connected in one way or another to the Jewish Hungarian billionaire and radical anti-American George Soros, the not so nice Jewish boy from Budapest.
Today more than ever, we must remain united in opposing this dangerous blame game created to letting President Obama off the hook. The buck stops at the White House and its about time that Obama takes responsibility during his watch. We can only hope and pray that the American public will withstand the expected effort to rebrand President Obama.
Don't Let Obama Off the Hook
Occupy Wall Street wants to do just that. They are worried about losing the White House. Eventually, they will shift the blame to the Jews. Some have already done that.
From Ron Jager
The creation of the “Occupy Wall Street” movement is a clear sign that Obama cannot be counted upon by his liberal supporters to be re-elected. The expected loss of the White House by the Democratic Party will most likely enable the Republicans to govern America for the coming decade. This is unacceptable to the Liberal Left, who believe that they and only they are destined to govern America. They claim loudly that they are more intelligent and more able to know what's best for America than their conservative counterparts.
However Obama's continuing ineptness and ineffective decision making concerning the economy has exposed this liberal mantra for what it is, a condescending and hallow believe, as Obama loses major sectors of support among the American public. Month after month as the unemployment rate has continued to defy gravity and keep millions of Americans out of work, President Obama has become the one most associated with the unrelenting deteriorating domestic situation in America.
In marketing terms, Obama has become a declining brand name, he no longer elicits a positive reaction, and has become a Presidential symbol of failure.
Nothing promotes a popular political libel, that is, the propagation of myths, lies and misinformation better than the convergence of interests by the media, the unions, the Liberals, and yes, the Democratic Party. Obama's Liberal supporters, have devised a wholly created "occupy " movement as a diversion tactic that will shift the blame from Obama to Wall Street, to the banks, to the rich, and if it continues long enough, the blame will be eventually shifted to the Jews.
The overall goal is that Obama will no longer be blamed; his credibility will become reminiscent of his status three years ago. The "Occupy Wall Street" movement spreading throughout America to Oakland, New York City, Portland, Los Angelos, Philadelphia, Seattle, Boston, Denver, and Des Moines, just to name a few cities, will be with us for the coming year as the 2012 Presidential election nears. The "Occupy" movement has one goal and only one goal; take the heat off Obama, and shift the blame.
In marketing terms, Obama has become a declining brand name.
There is a consensus that many of the "Occupy" demonstrators marching in the protests are being actively supported by the Democratic Party. Two recent examples are by Reps. Raul Grijalva (D-Arid.) and Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) who said in a joint statement. …“We share the anger and frustration of so many Americans who have seen the enormous toll that an unchecked Wall Street has taken on the overwhelming majority of Americans while benefiting the super wealthy,” and House Democratic Caucus Chairman John Larson (Conn.) who released a statement saying, “The silent masses aren’t so silent anymore. They are fighting to give voice to the struggles that everyday Americans are going through.”
So here we have it, Obama is not to blame they claim, Wall Street is to blame, Obama is a victim of Wall Street, just like us in the "Occupy" movement.
The problem with the Rebranding of Obama will be part and parcel of this campaign as we see the blame being shifted away from Obama. Till now Obama was perceived as a big-government liberal who has expanded regulations, created uncertainty for business and failed to revive the economy, with millions more Americans out of work than when he took office, and an unsteady leader who is unequipped to turn around a country in economic crisis.
Get ready for the new and improved Obama, who will never ask you, are you better off today than you where only four years ago when I was elected ?
Here in Israel we went through a similar period as recently as this past summer with the social protests taking over public parks, in all of Israel's major cities, and holding mass demonstrations. The parks were not only "occupied" but tent cities were established with similar services to what was reported at Zuccotti Park at Wall Street; public kitchens, infirmaries, libraries, and round the clock music and entertainment.
What's in common between our social protects and America's "occupy" movement is not only that they are anti-Democratic in nature, ignoring the will of the voting public, ignoring the rule of law, but they are all funded by umbrella organizations that are connected in one way or another to the Jewish Hungarian billionaire and radical anti-American George Soros, the not so nice Jewish boy from Budapest.
Today more than ever, we must remain united in opposing this dangerous blame game created to letting President Obama off the hook. The buck stops at the White House and its about time that Obama takes responsibility during his watch. We can only hope and pray that the American public will withstand the expected effort to rebrand President Obama.
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Latest from Israel Nov 23, 2011
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/Flash.aspx/225349
Israeli and Romanian Governments to Meet Thursday
The Israeli and Romanian governments will meet in Jerusalem Thursday. There will be working meetings in the morning between the ministers followed by a joint government session presided over by PM Netanyahu and his colleague, Romanian PM Emil Buch.
The PMs will sign a declaration describing the historical partnership between the countries, and the ambition to promote and reinforce the cooperation between Israel and Romania in a wide array of fields.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/10886
WESTERN FRONT: The End of the Peace Process
The Peace Process, that horrible masochistic program of terrorist empowerment, is a fading mirage that no one believes in anymore.
From Daniel Greenfield
The "peace process" which created two terrorist states inside Israel may have begun in Oslo, but it ended in Cairo. Normalizing relations with the rest of the Middle East was one of the carrots that got the Jewish state hopping down the appeasement trial-- and that carrot is now officially off the table.
The days when Thomas Friedman and his Saudi buddies could talk about normalization have passed. The Arab Spring saw to that and with Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and an unknown number of others sliding into the Islamist camp, and out of reach of negotiations, there's a New Middle East that has even less in common with the old gentlemanly diplomacy model than the old one did.
Some of the dimmer Israeli leaders may still believe that peace is possible with the Islamists of Turkey's AKP, but not even they think that peace is possible with the Brotherhood.
If Western diplomats could offer regional acceptance twenty years ago, today that has all the credibility of a Rolex sold out of a briefcase just off Central Park. The end of the Camp David Accords has killed the grandaddy of the appeasement through territorial surrender template and with Assad looking shaky, the refusal to give up the Golan Heights to Syria seems downright prescient even to peaceniks.
The Brotherhood's attitude toward Israel is indistinguishable from that of Iran, and with the Islamist way in ascendance, that attitude will be the dominant one throughout the region, turning back the clock on decades of diplomatic efforts. The Islamists will negotiate temporary truces and ceasefires, but not the peace and brotherhood accords so beloved by the US and the EU.
And even the remaining regimes that haven't fallen look like poor prospects for paying out peace dividends after even the most stable country in the region, Egypt, melted down into mob violence and religious fanaticism. If Egypt can turn into battling mobs who don't agree on anything except their hatred for religious and ethnic minorities, including a country full of them living next door, then no Muslim nation in the region is safe.
Without normalization on the table, all that's left is outside pressure. But for the first time in a long time the Arab Spring has given Western diplomats something to do in the region besides denounce Jews living in Jerusalem. And the usual Arab League chorus that the region's problems would be solved if only there were a Palestinian state sounds silly even to veteran diplomats who usually funnel this sort of nonsense right back to the White House.
Obama's hostility toward Israel has paradoxically lessened the pressure by removing the leverage. Condoleezza Rice could get on the phone and warn that another house in XYZ would wreck the positive relationship with the White House. But there is as much of a prospect of a positive relationship with the White House, as there is with Iran, Hamas and the Brotherhood.
Israel still has a strategic relationship with the United States, but relations with the administration are cold, which also means there is less to be afraid of. Netanyahu's exchange with Obama was startling for a careful diplomat from a country that usually avoids offending its big brother. The only way it could have happened is if Netanyahu had felt that there was nothing to lose. And he was right.
the Arab Spring has given Western diplomats something to do in the region besides denounce Jews living in Jerusalem.
For the first time since Begin, an Israeli leader pushed back against White House pressure and it led to a slight improvement, not because Obama listened, but because the relationship was so toxic that using the confrontational tactics practiced by the Palestinian Authority actually worked. Only when the relationship hit rock bottom, was any attempt made by the White House to salvage it.
The situation is even uglier on the European side, which has not been friendly in a long time, but hasn't been this hateful either. But all that ugliness also translates into a loss of influence over Israel. You can only slap your allies so many times, denounce them and threaten them before they begin paying a lot less attention to you.
Irrational demands that can't be fulfilled have brought the situation to that point. It was one thing when the Clinton or Bush administrations were demanding that Israel go to the negotiating table and offer concessions. It was ugly and unfair, but at least it was specific. These days Abbas doesn't want to go to the negotiating table, and the same demands keep coming out of Washington D.C. and Brussels. Israel is being ordered to make peace when the other side won't even bother showing up to negotiate.
How can Israel make peace when the Palestinian Authority has been split into Hamas and Fatah run fiefdoms and neither side is even bothering to pretend to negotiate? It can't and even diplomats know that, which makes every volley of demands look like messages for the Muslim world.
When Helen Clark wanted to sell more New Zealand sheep to the Saudis, her marketing gimmick was a hate campaign against Israel. Clark has gone off to a sinecure at the UN, but most of the West is acting the same way now. Europe isn't trying to sell sheep, its leaders are acting like sheep in the face of the Islamic demographic destiny spilling across their lands. The Obama Administration lit the fuse of the Arab Spring and is getting nervous as the flames keep rising higher.
Western condemnations of Israel are increasingly no longer directed to Israel, but to the Muslim world, which makes it easier for Israel to ignore them. While the White House claimed that the Biden incident was about the timing of a construction approval announcement in Jerusalem, it was really about showing the Muslim world that this administration really had the knives out for Israel. If it hadn't been a house in Jerusalem, it would have been a border shooting, a strike in Gaza or a clash at a checkpoint. Something would have been found.
But the more America and Europe have pandered to the Muslim world, the more obvious it has become to Israel that it has no role to play in this exchange, except its time honored position as the scapegoat.
The new normalization is no longer the offer to normalize ties with the Muslim world, but warnings that Israel's ties to Europe will require the same kind of normalization if Israel's Prime Minister doesn't snap his fingers and make peace happen. It would be a more effective threat if the current crop of European leaders didn't' make de Gaulle seem pro-Israel.
Cameron, Sarkozy and Obama, three of the slimiest first world leaders, haven't made their dislike of Israel such a secret that it took a microphone error for it to be discovered. Merkel has dispensed with the usual show of Gemutlichkeit toward the Jewish state and the situation in Brussels is as ugly as it could be. It all blends into one long angry tantrum about peace dispensed by insecure politicians with a wholly different agenda.
All that leaves Israel with fewer reasons to participate. The strategic and economic ties still matter, but they're more mutual than anyone cares to admit. American and European leaders may kick Israel, but it's also the only reliable ally in the region. And the Arab Springer is a reminder that there is one country that won't implode and can be counted on as a point of stability.
Obama is capable of cutting off his nose to spite his face, but the Clinton era foreign policy hands still have enough control that it isn't likely to happen before the next election-- though all bets are off if he gets a second term. European leaders dislike Israel, but they also know that there are times when they need it. It's a high tech incubator that's a lot closer than Asia, it's an arm of the West in the East and if the relationship is sliding under the table, that's the kind of relationship Israel has with much of the world, from China to Saudi Arabia.
The isolation is a problem, but it's also liberating. The weight of expectations has nearly broken Israel and the Obama Administration may be one of the best things that happened to it by forcing it to recognize that it was alone. Israeli dependence on the United States is not financial as most people think, it is mainly psychological. Alone in a region full of Muslim tyrannies, the need to believe in a close relationship with an admirable global power was powerful.
Friendship with America wasn't like friendship with Russia or China. The United States is admired by people around the world for its accomplishments and its standing. For all the anti-war rallies, it is a nation that aspires to a higher standard. A virtuous Rome, an Athens without slaves, a standard bearer for the new age of mankind.
Only the United States could make a call for concessions to terrorists sound noble, when it would have sounded hopelessly venal from any European power. But in the age of Obama the nobility has run out and so has the peace. The illusions are dead and Israel is in survival mode, struggling to avoid any attention from Washington D.C. while keeping the country on track.
The Peace Process, that horrible masochistic program of terrorist empowerment, is a fading mirage that no one believes in anymore. The pretense that the handshake in the Rose Garden overseen by a beaming Clinton was something other than cynicism and bad policymaking mythologized into a transcendent expression of a new age of peace is over and done with. The cost has been high and all of it has been in vain.
As the West follows the Islam appeasement track domestically and internationally, its relationship with Israel will continue to degrade. The Peace Process was an expression of a dying belief in the orderly world of negotiated international peace envisioned by European policymakers for over a hundred years. Now that same world has brought Europe and Israel to the brink of ruin. It's no wonder that Israel has left the peace process by the side door.
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-11/23/c_131265558.htm
HANOI, Nov. 23 (Xinhua) -- Vietnamese President Truong Tan Sang held talks here on Wednesday with his Israeli counterpart Shimon Peres during the latter's visit to Vietnam.
Sang welcomed Peres and his entourage, saying his visit is a vivid symbol of the developing relations and cooperation between the two countries.
The Vietnamese leader informed his guest of the country's achievements in the renewal process and confirmed its consistent policy to be a credited friend and partner of other countries across the world for peace, independence and development.
In its foreign policy of diversification and multilateralization, Vietnam attaches importance to developing relations and cooperation with the West Asian countries, including Israel, and supporting the process of negotiation and peaceful settlement of conflicts, including those between Israel and Palestine, based on international laws, for legitimate interest of the related parties, Sang added.
Israeli and Romanian Governments to Meet Thursday
The Israeli and Romanian governments will meet in Jerusalem Thursday. There will be working meetings in the morning between the ministers followed by a joint government session presided over by PM Netanyahu and his colleague, Romanian PM Emil Buch.
The PMs will sign a declaration describing the historical partnership between the countries, and the ambition to promote and reinforce the cooperation between Israel and Romania in a wide array of fields.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/10886
WESTERN FRONT: The End of the Peace Process
The Peace Process, that horrible masochistic program of terrorist empowerment, is a fading mirage that no one believes in anymore.
From Daniel Greenfield
The "peace process" which created two terrorist states inside Israel may have begun in Oslo, but it ended in Cairo. Normalizing relations with the rest of the Middle East was one of the carrots that got the Jewish state hopping down the appeasement trial-- and that carrot is now officially off the table.
The days when Thomas Friedman and his Saudi buddies could talk about normalization have passed. The Arab Spring saw to that and with Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and an unknown number of others sliding into the Islamist camp, and out of reach of negotiations, there's a New Middle East that has even less in common with the old gentlemanly diplomacy model than the old one did.
Some of the dimmer Israeli leaders may still believe that peace is possible with the Islamists of Turkey's AKP, but not even they think that peace is possible with the Brotherhood.
If Western diplomats could offer regional acceptance twenty years ago, today that has all the credibility of a Rolex sold out of a briefcase just off Central Park. The end of the Camp David Accords has killed the grandaddy of the appeasement through territorial surrender template and with Assad looking shaky, the refusal to give up the Golan Heights to Syria seems downright prescient even to peaceniks.
The Brotherhood's attitude toward Israel is indistinguishable from that of Iran, and with the Islamist way in ascendance, that attitude will be the dominant one throughout the region, turning back the clock on decades of diplomatic efforts. The Islamists will negotiate temporary truces and ceasefires, but not the peace and brotherhood accords so beloved by the US and the EU.
And even the remaining regimes that haven't fallen look like poor prospects for paying out peace dividends after even the most stable country in the region, Egypt, melted down into mob violence and religious fanaticism. If Egypt can turn into battling mobs who don't agree on anything except their hatred for religious and ethnic minorities, including a country full of them living next door, then no Muslim nation in the region is safe.
Without normalization on the table, all that's left is outside pressure. But for the first time in a long time the Arab Spring has given Western diplomats something to do in the region besides denounce Jews living in Jerusalem. And the usual Arab League chorus that the region's problems would be solved if only there were a Palestinian state sounds silly even to veteran diplomats who usually funnel this sort of nonsense right back to the White House.
Obama's hostility toward Israel has paradoxically lessened the pressure by removing the leverage. Condoleezza Rice could get on the phone and warn that another house in XYZ would wreck the positive relationship with the White House. But there is as much of a prospect of a positive relationship with the White House, as there is with Iran, Hamas and the Brotherhood.
Israel still has a strategic relationship with the United States, but relations with the administration are cold, which also means there is less to be afraid of. Netanyahu's exchange with Obama was startling for a careful diplomat from a country that usually avoids offending its big brother. The only way it could have happened is if Netanyahu had felt that there was nothing to lose. And he was right.
the Arab Spring has given Western diplomats something to do in the region besides denounce Jews living in Jerusalem.
For the first time since Begin, an Israeli leader pushed back against White House pressure and it led to a slight improvement, not because Obama listened, but because the relationship was so toxic that using the confrontational tactics practiced by the Palestinian Authority actually worked. Only when the relationship hit rock bottom, was any attempt made by the White House to salvage it.
The situation is even uglier on the European side, which has not been friendly in a long time, but hasn't been this hateful either. But all that ugliness also translates into a loss of influence over Israel. You can only slap your allies so many times, denounce them and threaten them before they begin paying a lot less attention to you.
Irrational demands that can't be fulfilled have brought the situation to that point. It was one thing when the Clinton or Bush administrations were demanding that Israel go to the negotiating table and offer concessions. It was ugly and unfair, but at least it was specific. These days Abbas doesn't want to go to the negotiating table, and the same demands keep coming out of Washington D.C. and Brussels. Israel is being ordered to make peace when the other side won't even bother showing up to negotiate.
How can Israel make peace when the Palestinian Authority has been split into Hamas and Fatah run fiefdoms and neither side is even bothering to pretend to negotiate? It can't and even diplomats know that, which makes every volley of demands look like messages for the Muslim world.
When Helen Clark wanted to sell more New Zealand sheep to the Saudis, her marketing gimmick was a hate campaign against Israel. Clark has gone off to a sinecure at the UN, but most of the West is acting the same way now. Europe isn't trying to sell sheep, its leaders are acting like sheep in the face of the Islamic demographic destiny spilling across their lands. The Obama Administration lit the fuse of the Arab Spring and is getting nervous as the flames keep rising higher.
Western condemnations of Israel are increasingly no longer directed to Israel, but to the Muslim world, which makes it easier for Israel to ignore them. While the White House claimed that the Biden incident was about the timing of a construction approval announcement in Jerusalem, it was really about showing the Muslim world that this administration really had the knives out for Israel. If it hadn't been a house in Jerusalem, it would have been a border shooting, a strike in Gaza or a clash at a checkpoint. Something would have been found.
But the more America and Europe have pandered to the Muslim world, the more obvious it has become to Israel that it has no role to play in this exchange, except its time honored position as the scapegoat.
The new normalization is no longer the offer to normalize ties with the Muslim world, but warnings that Israel's ties to Europe will require the same kind of normalization if Israel's Prime Minister doesn't snap his fingers and make peace happen. It would be a more effective threat if the current crop of European leaders didn't' make de Gaulle seem pro-Israel.
Cameron, Sarkozy and Obama, three of the slimiest first world leaders, haven't made their dislike of Israel such a secret that it took a microphone error for it to be discovered. Merkel has dispensed with the usual show of Gemutlichkeit toward the Jewish state and the situation in Brussels is as ugly as it could be. It all blends into one long angry tantrum about peace dispensed by insecure politicians with a wholly different agenda.
All that leaves Israel with fewer reasons to participate. The strategic and economic ties still matter, but they're more mutual than anyone cares to admit. American and European leaders may kick Israel, but it's also the only reliable ally in the region. And the Arab Springer is a reminder that there is one country that won't implode and can be counted on as a point of stability.
Obama is capable of cutting off his nose to spite his face, but the Clinton era foreign policy hands still have enough control that it isn't likely to happen before the next election-- though all bets are off if he gets a second term. European leaders dislike Israel, but they also know that there are times when they need it. It's a high tech incubator that's a lot closer than Asia, it's an arm of the West in the East and if the relationship is sliding under the table, that's the kind of relationship Israel has with much of the world, from China to Saudi Arabia.
The isolation is a problem, but it's also liberating. The weight of expectations has nearly broken Israel and the Obama Administration may be one of the best things that happened to it by forcing it to recognize that it was alone. Israeli dependence on the United States is not financial as most people think, it is mainly psychological. Alone in a region full of Muslim tyrannies, the need to believe in a close relationship with an admirable global power was powerful.
Friendship with America wasn't like friendship with Russia or China. The United States is admired by people around the world for its accomplishments and its standing. For all the anti-war rallies, it is a nation that aspires to a higher standard. A virtuous Rome, an Athens without slaves, a standard bearer for the new age of mankind.
Only the United States could make a call for concessions to terrorists sound noble, when it would have sounded hopelessly venal from any European power. But in the age of Obama the nobility has run out and so has the peace. The illusions are dead and Israel is in survival mode, struggling to avoid any attention from Washington D.C. while keeping the country on track.
The Peace Process, that horrible masochistic program of terrorist empowerment, is a fading mirage that no one believes in anymore. The pretense that the handshake in the Rose Garden overseen by a beaming Clinton was something other than cynicism and bad policymaking mythologized into a transcendent expression of a new age of peace is over and done with. The cost has been high and all of it has been in vain.
As the West follows the Islam appeasement track domestically and internationally, its relationship with Israel will continue to degrade. The Peace Process was an expression of a dying belief in the orderly world of negotiated international peace envisioned by European policymakers for over a hundred years. Now that same world has brought Europe and Israel to the brink of ruin. It's no wonder that Israel has left the peace process by the side door.
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-11/23/c_131265558.htm
HANOI, Nov. 23 (Xinhua) -- Vietnamese President Truong Tan Sang held talks here on Wednesday with his Israeli counterpart Shimon Peres during the latter's visit to Vietnam.
Sang welcomed Peres and his entourage, saying his visit is a vivid symbol of the developing relations and cooperation between the two countries.
The Vietnamese leader informed his guest of the country's achievements in the renewal process and confirmed its consistent policy to be a credited friend and partner of other countries across the world for peace, independence and development.
In its foreign policy of diversification and multilateralization, Vietnam attaches importance to developing relations and cooperation with the West Asian countries, including Israel, and supporting the process of negotiation and peaceful settlement of conflicts, including those between Israel and Palestine, based on international laws, for legitimate interest of the related parties, Sang added.
Saturday, November 19, 2011
Latest from teh Middle East
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/10858#.TsfjInIVi-U
MIDEAST NOTES: Syria, Turkey and the Kurds
The Kurds, deprived of a homeland in spite of being promised self-determination in the aftermath of World War One, are beginning to play the role of kingmakers in key countries.
From Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi
According to a report by the French daily Le Figaro, Bashar al-Assad is apparently aiming to destabilize Turkey, which has been supporting the predominantly Sunni Islamist leadership of opposition groups to the Syrian regime, by seeking to grant greater autonomy to the Kurdish population that primarily lives in the north and north-east of Syria.
Aspart of this initiative, Assad has reportedly encouraged the opening of Kurdish schools in the north, and has allowed for a Kurdish politician by the name of Muhammad Salih Muslim- a member of the Democratic Union Party (PYD) that is suspected of being affiliated with the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) and is apparently organizing local elections in the Kurdish areas- to return to Syria from exile in Iraq.
What are the observations and conclusions to draw from this report if it is credible?
First, that Assad might wish to use the Kurds as proxies against Turkey in a way has precedent in Syrian policy.
Bashar’s father Hafez had once provided a safe haven for the PKK to launch attacks on Turkish soil, and it was during those years that Turkey, sensing that there was a common terrorist threat in the region, had particularly good ties with Israel. However, in 1998, once Turkey threatened to invade Syria to take out the PKK, Hafez changed course, and the tensions between the two countries slowly began to cool down.
On the other hand, while Hafez was sympathetic to the PKK in so far as he could use the group as a proxy against Turkey, granting any form of autonomy was always out of the question. As Adib Abdulmajid points out, one of the key texts that has traditionally defined the Baathist government’s discriminatory policies against Kurds in Syria is a book entitled ‘A Political, Ethnic, and Social Study of Al-Jazeera Province,’ written by a First Lieutenant in the Syrian Army, Muhammad Talab Hilal.
In his book, Hilal claimed that the Kurds ‘had used the pure religion of Islam for their national goals,’ and argued that they were orchestrating a sinister program of mass immigration into the Al-Jazeera region of the country’s northeast in order to facilitate the creation of a greater Kurdistan. Hence he lambasted the Kurds, calling them ‘rabid dogs’ whose ‘annoying barking’ had to be stopped.
The Syrian regime therefore launched a campaign, after the publication of this book, to carry out a policy of Arabization in Al-Jazeera, similar to Saddam Hussein’s policies in the north of Iraq. Among these Arabization measures included the loss of Syrian citizenship for 400,000 Kurds (a 1962 measure that predated the Assad dynasty by eight years), confiscation of lands for Arab settlers, and the imprisonment, torture and execution of Kurdish activists.
Coming back to the present day, it is plausible that Assad would make concessions to Kurdish demands in order to weaken the opposition, which certainly has some Kurds among its ranks. The Syrian Kurds in general, like those in Iraq, are undoubtedly more concerned with achieving autonomy at the minimum, rather than overthrowing the central government as an end in itself.
Even among Kurds hostile to Assad, there has been a degree of reluctance to work with the opposition coalition known as the Syrian National Council (SNC), which has set up a government-in-exile. This should not be surprising in light of the insistence among many members of the SNC that Syria retain its identity as an ‘Arab Republic’ (‘Syrian Arab Republic’ being the official name for Syria at present).
In addition, as Michael Weiss notes, the Kurds feel under-represented in the Secretariat of the SNC, having only four out of twenty-nine seats, and are concerned about Turkish involvement with the SNC. Thus, it should not come as shock if Assad is trying to exploit these tensions between the Kurds and the SNC.
Nonetheless, if Assad is trying to reach out to Kurds to maintain his hold on power, the initiative of granting greater autonomy could prove a double-edged sword for him. As disclosures from Wikileaks cables reveal, Christians in Al-Jazeera province have claimed that the Kurds have gradually altered the demographics of the area through immigration and high birthrates, such that an alleged 80-90% historic Christian majority is said to have now become a 35% minority.
Owing to these suspicions and fears of Kurdish aspirations in the area, Assad could well see significant numbers of the Christian minority in Syria- comprising around 10% of the population- turn against him should he be granting autonomy to the Kurds in Al-Jazeera province.
But perhaps Assad has decided on balance that the Christians will ultimately refrain from siding with the predominantly Sunni Arab protestors on account of fear of reprisals or discrimination at the hands of a Sunni Islamist regime that might come to power, should the Baathist regime fall.
Assad is trying to reach out to Kurds to maintain his hold on power, but the initiative of granting greater autonomy could prove a double-edged sword for him.
More generally, the above observations demonstrate that the Kurds are increasingly a force that can no longer just be regarded as sitting on the sidelines.
Iraq is another case in point, where the Kurdish parties now form a key part of the ruling coalition in Baghdad.
Consequently, the Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has often been forced to make concessions to the Kurds, such as allowing the Peshmerga (Kurdish militiamen) to move into the disputed territory of Khanaqin district in Diyala province to annex it on the pretext of security issues. When al-Maliki tried to bolster his nationalist credentials by ordering the Kurds in Khanaqin to lower Kurdish flags, demonstrations were staged in response and al-Maliki backed down.
It is noteworthy how the Kurds, deprived of a homeland in spite of being promised self-determination in the aftermath of World War One, are beginning to play the role of kingmakers in the two countries that have been ruled by Baathist governments (in Iraq this rule lasted from 1968 until the U.S.-led invasion in 2003).
Indeed, despite Baathism’s claims to uphold pan-Arab nationalism, the ideology has been little more than a façade for minority despotism: Alawite in the case of Syria, Sunni Arab in the case of Iraq.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/149883#.Tsfjn3IVi-U
Report: Arab Nations Pressing for Iran Strike
According to intelligence reports Saudi Arabia and its Gulf Arab allies have been pushing the US to strike Iran by year's end.
Gavriel Queenann
Newly acquired intelligence reports indicate several Arab countries in the Middle East are lobbying the US to strike Iran this year, Israel's Channel 10 reported.
According to the report, which is said to be making its rounds in Britain's political circles, Saudi Arabia wants the Obama administration to attack Iran's nuclear facilities before the final withdrawal of US troops from Iraq.
US president has vowed to close the door on American military involvement in Iraq by year’s end, but Riyadh is reportedly afraid Iran will use the American exit to take over the country.
Since 2008, officials in the Iraqi interim government have complained to Washington that both Iran and Saudi Arabia were, respectively, funding the Shiite and Sunni insurgencies that have plagued the country since the US-led invasion that toppled late dictator Sadam Hussein.
Security experts say Baghdad's security forces are unprepared to confront the rival insurgencies that hold Iraq in their grip - and that Obama's dogged drive to fulfill his campaign promise may have disastrous consequences both for the region and US interests.
Saudi Arabia and its Gulf Arab allies have been locked in a strategic battle with Iran for hegemony over the Persian Gulf - and have accused Tehran of seeking to destabilize the region through its ‘Shiite Diaspora.’
Gulf Arab leaders have sought to exert pressure on Iran and its regional allies - most notably Syrian president Bashar al-Assad - by allying themselves with Western powers opposed to Tehran's aggressive posture.
They have also joined western powers in targeting Iran's nuclear program, which they see as targeting them first and foremost - rather than Israel, who Iran has threatened repeatedly with destruction.
Suadia Arabia has also said, should Iran obtain nuclear weapons, Riyahd will seek them as well - raising the specter of a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. Analysts say this may be a lever to spur Obama to alter course from his current passive, sanctions-driven posture towards Iran.
Despite this, Arab powers have been reticent to publicly call for an Iran strike - which has been a high profile part of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's diplomatic agenda.
Instead, observers say, they have sought to work behind the scenes to avoid being seen as working in concert with Israel.
MIDEAST NOTES: Syria, Turkey and the Kurds
The Kurds, deprived of a homeland in spite of being promised self-determination in the aftermath of World War One, are beginning to play the role of kingmakers in key countries.
From Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi
According to a report by the French daily Le Figaro, Bashar al-Assad is apparently aiming to destabilize Turkey, which has been supporting the predominantly Sunni Islamist leadership of opposition groups to the Syrian regime, by seeking to grant greater autonomy to the Kurdish population that primarily lives in the north and north-east of Syria.
Aspart of this initiative, Assad has reportedly encouraged the opening of Kurdish schools in the north, and has allowed for a Kurdish politician by the name of Muhammad Salih Muslim- a member of the Democratic Union Party (PYD) that is suspected of being affiliated with the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) and is apparently organizing local elections in the Kurdish areas- to return to Syria from exile in Iraq.
What are the observations and conclusions to draw from this report if it is credible?
First, that Assad might wish to use the Kurds as proxies against Turkey in a way has precedent in Syrian policy.
Bashar’s father Hafez had once provided a safe haven for the PKK to launch attacks on Turkish soil, and it was during those years that Turkey, sensing that there was a common terrorist threat in the region, had particularly good ties with Israel. However, in 1998, once Turkey threatened to invade Syria to take out the PKK, Hafez changed course, and the tensions between the two countries slowly began to cool down.
On the other hand, while Hafez was sympathetic to the PKK in so far as he could use the group as a proxy against Turkey, granting any form of autonomy was always out of the question. As Adib Abdulmajid points out, one of the key texts that has traditionally defined the Baathist government’s discriminatory policies against Kurds in Syria is a book entitled ‘A Political, Ethnic, and Social Study of Al-Jazeera Province,’ written by a First Lieutenant in the Syrian Army, Muhammad Talab Hilal.
In his book, Hilal claimed that the Kurds ‘had used the pure religion of Islam for their national goals,’ and argued that they were orchestrating a sinister program of mass immigration into the Al-Jazeera region of the country’s northeast in order to facilitate the creation of a greater Kurdistan. Hence he lambasted the Kurds, calling them ‘rabid dogs’ whose ‘annoying barking’ had to be stopped.
The Syrian regime therefore launched a campaign, after the publication of this book, to carry out a policy of Arabization in Al-Jazeera, similar to Saddam Hussein’s policies in the north of Iraq. Among these Arabization measures included the loss of Syrian citizenship for 400,000 Kurds (a 1962 measure that predated the Assad dynasty by eight years), confiscation of lands for Arab settlers, and the imprisonment, torture and execution of Kurdish activists.
Coming back to the present day, it is plausible that Assad would make concessions to Kurdish demands in order to weaken the opposition, which certainly has some Kurds among its ranks. The Syrian Kurds in general, like those in Iraq, are undoubtedly more concerned with achieving autonomy at the minimum, rather than overthrowing the central government as an end in itself.
Even among Kurds hostile to Assad, there has been a degree of reluctance to work with the opposition coalition known as the Syrian National Council (SNC), which has set up a government-in-exile. This should not be surprising in light of the insistence among many members of the SNC that Syria retain its identity as an ‘Arab Republic’ (‘Syrian Arab Republic’ being the official name for Syria at present).
In addition, as Michael Weiss notes, the Kurds feel under-represented in the Secretariat of the SNC, having only four out of twenty-nine seats, and are concerned about Turkish involvement with the SNC. Thus, it should not come as shock if Assad is trying to exploit these tensions between the Kurds and the SNC.
Nonetheless, if Assad is trying to reach out to Kurds to maintain his hold on power, the initiative of granting greater autonomy could prove a double-edged sword for him. As disclosures from Wikileaks cables reveal, Christians in Al-Jazeera province have claimed that the Kurds have gradually altered the demographics of the area through immigration and high birthrates, such that an alleged 80-90% historic Christian majority is said to have now become a 35% minority.
Owing to these suspicions and fears of Kurdish aspirations in the area, Assad could well see significant numbers of the Christian minority in Syria- comprising around 10% of the population- turn against him should he be granting autonomy to the Kurds in Al-Jazeera province.
But perhaps Assad has decided on balance that the Christians will ultimately refrain from siding with the predominantly Sunni Arab protestors on account of fear of reprisals or discrimination at the hands of a Sunni Islamist regime that might come to power, should the Baathist regime fall.
Assad is trying to reach out to Kurds to maintain his hold on power, but the initiative of granting greater autonomy could prove a double-edged sword for him.
More generally, the above observations demonstrate that the Kurds are increasingly a force that can no longer just be regarded as sitting on the sidelines.
Iraq is another case in point, where the Kurdish parties now form a key part of the ruling coalition in Baghdad.
Consequently, the Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has often been forced to make concessions to the Kurds, such as allowing the Peshmerga (Kurdish militiamen) to move into the disputed territory of Khanaqin district in Diyala province to annex it on the pretext of security issues. When al-Maliki tried to bolster his nationalist credentials by ordering the Kurds in Khanaqin to lower Kurdish flags, demonstrations were staged in response and al-Maliki backed down.
It is noteworthy how the Kurds, deprived of a homeland in spite of being promised self-determination in the aftermath of World War One, are beginning to play the role of kingmakers in the two countries that have been ruled by Baathist governments (in Iraq this rule lasted from 1968 until the U.S.-led invasion in 2003).
Indeed, despite Baathism’s claims to uphold pan-Arab nationalism, the ideology has been little more than a façade for minority despotism: Alawite in the case of Syria, Sunni Arab in the case of Iraq.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/149883#.Tsfjn3IVi-U
Report: Arab Nations Pressing for Iran Strike
According to intelligence reports Saudi Arabia and its Gulf Arab allies have been pushing the US to strike Iran by year's end.
Gavriel Queenann
Newly acquired intelligence reports indicate several Arab countries in the Middle East are lobbying the US to strike Iran this year, Israel's Channel 10 reported.
According to the report, which is said to be making its rounds in Britain's political circles, Saudi Arabia wants the Obama administration to attack Iran's nuclear facilities before the final withdrawal of US troops from Iraq.
US president has vowed to close the door on American military involvement in Iraq by year’s end, but Riyadh is reportedly afraid Iran will use the American exit to take over the country.
Since 2008, officials in the Iraqi interim government have complained to Washington that both Iran and Saudi Arabia were, respectively, funding the Shiite and Sunni insurgencies that have plagued the country since the US-led invasion that toppled late dictator Sadam Hussein.
Security experts say Baghdad's security forces are unprepared to confront the rival insurgencies that hold Iraq in their grip - and that Obama's dogged drive to fulfill his campaign promise may have disastrous consequences both for the region and US interests.
Saudi Arabia and its Gulf Arab allies have been locked in a strategic battle with Iran for hegemony over the Persian Gulf - and have accused Tehran of seeking to destabilize the region through its ‘Shiite Diaspora.’
Gulf Arab leaders have sought to exert pressure on Iran and its regional allies - most notably Syrian president Bashar al-Assad - by allying themselves with Western powers opposed to Tehran's aggressive posture.
They have also joined western powers in targeting Iran's nuclear program, which they see as targeting them first and foremost - rather than Israel, who Iran has threatened repeatedly with destruction.
Suadia Arabia has also said, should Iran obtain nuclear weapons, Riyahd will seek them as well - raising the specter of a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. Analysts say this may be a lever to spur Obama to alter course from his current passive, sanctions-driven posture towards Iran.
Despite this, Arab powers have been reticent to publicly call for an Iran strike - which has been a high profile part of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's diplomatic agenda.
Instead, observers say, they have sought to work behind the scenes to avoid being seen as working in concert with Israel.
Monday, November 14, 2011
Latest from Israel
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/149729#.TsF6l3IVi-U
Kenya Asks Israel: Help Us Fight Al Qaeda
Kenya’s prime minister, visiting Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Peres, asks Israel to help him get rid of Al Qaeda terrorists.
Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu
Kenya’s prime minister, visiting Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and President Shimon Peres, asks Israel to help his country get rid of Al Qaeda terrorists.
Kenya’s soldiers have crossed into Somalia to hunt down al-Shabab terrorists, linked with Al Qaeda, in Somalia.
Prime Minister Raila Odinga asked Preisdent Peres Monday for helping his security forces in light of Israel’s reputation for knowing how to combat terror. Foreign news agencies noted that Kenya’s request could provoke al-Shabab terrorists, who already have threatened to stage attacks in the capital of Kenya.
The African country, which has a high presence of Israeli businessmen and private security personnel, has accused al Shabab terrorists of being behind several kidnappings in Kenya.
Prime Minister Raila Odinga met with Prime Minister Netanyahu Monday morning “in continuation of the deepening of Israel's relations with African countries,” government spokesmen said.
Netanyahu met with the president of Uganda on Sunday and with the South Sudanese president in the United Nations two months ago.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/149736#.TsF38HIVi-U
FM to France: Send the Foreign Legion to Gaza
Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman chided French criticism of Israel's Gaza blockade - saying France needs to pull its weight.
Gavriel Queenann
Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said Monday that Israel would be happy to lift its blockade on Hamas-run Gaza if France would pull its weight - by sending in the Foreign Legion to keep order.
Lieberman, known for his candid and colorful mode of expression, was responding to recent criticism from the government of French President Nicolas Sarkozy.
The Foreign Minister said he had raised the idea during talks with his French counterpart Alain Juppe in June.
"I have no problem in lifting the blockade tomorrow as long as there is a force to inspect everything coming into the Gaza Strip and (prevent) terrorist activity," Lieberman told MPs on Monday.
"Instead of us doing it ourselves, you (can) send the French Foreign Legion!"
A French foreign ministry official confirmed Lieberman's previous remarks to Alain Juppe to AFP.
"Don't send girls with olive branches," Lieberman added Monday, referencing a boatload of French activists who tried to breach Israel's blockade on Gaza.
The United Nations Palmer Report on the 2010 Mavi Marmara incident concluded Israel's blockade of Gaza was both "legal and appropriate" as a means of curtailing arms to the Hamas terror organization.
Israeli officials note that the Kerem Shalom crossing to Gaza is never at full capacity despite all international aid requests being made.
French and Western criticism of Israel's arms embargo - predicated on the claim there is a 'humanitarian crisis' in Gaza - is unfounded, the officials say
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/10839#.TsF7RHIVi-U
The NGO Bill: Who is Being Undemocratic?
This bill doesn’t prevent the NGO’s from doing what they are doing. It simply aims to prevent them from being funded by outside bodies who are doing so not because they want to advance human rights but because they want to thwart Israeli policies.
From Ted Belman
The government is proposing legislation that applies to “political NGO’s”. The bill’s explanatory notes state explicitly that it is intended to deal with “organizations acting in the guise of human rights organizations that seek to influence the political discourse, character and policies of the State of Israel.”
The Bill would ban “political” non-governmental organizations from receiving donations of over NIS 20,000 from foreign governments or international organizations.
The leftist Israeli newspaper Haaretz argues,
Since they do not have any legal justification for shutting down these human rights organizations, Netanyahu and his colleagues are trying to achieve this goal via the parliamentary majority they command. As opposed to donations from unsupervised private sources, which also flow to right-wing organizations, human rights organizations receive aid from legitimate bodies like the United Nations and the European Union, which scrupulously abide by the rules of transparency.
It is not a question of whether these bodies are “legitimate” or not but rather whether their activities are. Implicit in this last sentence is the thought that “right wing organizations” are not even legitimate.
Even if there is nothing morally or legally wrong with the US administration working to unseat foreign governments including those in Israel, the question becomes is the victim country democratically bound to permit them to do so. In the past the US has contributed to the fall of a number of Israeli governments in the hope of it being replaced by a more friendly government.
Similarly, the European governments are working to thwart the will of the majority in Israel because it opposes their agenda which, for instance, is to stop settlement construction. They buttress their agenda by financially supporting Israeli NGO’s that are friendly to their agenda.
The government says their activities go far beyond protection of human rights and into the realm of affecting the political discourse. They most certainly do. It should be noted that these activities have more to do with providing the international community with evidence than they do to with changing the local discourse. Haaretz is saying that they have every right to interfere in our policy making and we do not have the democratic right to thwart their activities by denying access their money.
This Bill doesn’t prevent the NGO’s from doing what they are doing. It simply aims to prevent them from being funded by outside government and international bodies who are doing so not because they want to advance human rights but because they want to thwart Israeli policies or actions with which they disagree such as settlement construction or self defense.
These NGO’s are acting subversively to the democratically elected government.
A
The US outlaws the use of foreign funds by local candidates. Is this, too, undemocratic?
re they being democratic when they reject the will of the majority and openly align with foreign governments to thwart that will?
Furthermore we know that well financed PR campaigns can affect the will of the majority. How much more so if foreign governments added considerably to the funds available for PR including massive advertising budgets.
The US outlaws the use of foreign funds by local candidates. Is this too undemocratic? It also puts limits on what individuals or corporations can contribute to candidates.
In both cases the US is protecting democracy from foreign or undue influence and not undermining it.
Israel likewise.
Kenya Asks Israel: Help Us Fight Al Qaeda
Kenya’s prime minister, visiting Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Peres, asks Israel to help him get rid of Al Qaeda terrorists.
Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu
Kenya’s prime minister, visiting Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and President Shimon Peres, asks Israel to help his country get rid of Al Qaeda terrorists.
Kenya’s soldiers have crossed into Somalia to hunt down al-Shabab terrorists, linked with Al Qaeda, in Somalia.
Prime Minister Raila Odinga asked Preisdent Peres Monday for helping his security forces in light of Israel’s reputation for knowing how to combat terror. Foreign news agencies noted that Kenya’s request could provoke al-Shabab terrorists, who already have threatened to stage attacks in the capital of Kenya.
The African country, which has a high presence of Israeli businessmen and private security personnel, has accused al Shabab terrorists of being behind several kidnappings in Kenya.
Prime Minister Raila Odinga met with Prime Minister Netanyahu Monday morning “in continuation of the deepening of Israel's relations with African countries,” government spokesmen said.
Netanyahu met with the president of Uganda on Sunday and with the South Sudanese president in the United Nations two months ago.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/149736#.TsF38HIVi-U
FM to France: Send the Foreign Legion to Gaza
Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman chided French criticism of Israel's Gaza blockade - saying France needs to pull its weight.
Gavriel Queenann
Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said Monday that Israel would be happy to lift its blockade on Hamas-run Gaza if France would pull its weight - by sending in the Foreign Legion to keep order.
Lieberman, known for his candid and colorful mode of expression, was responding to recent criticism from the government of French President Nicolas Sarkozy.
The Foreign Minister said he had raised the idea during talks with his French counterpart Alain Juppe in June.
"I have no problem in lifting the blockade tomorrow as long as there is a force to inspect everything coming into the Gaza Strip and (prevent) terrorist activity," Lieberman told MPs on Monday.
"Instead of us doing it ourselves, you (can) send the French Foreign Legion!"
A French foreign ministry official confirmed Lieberman's previous remarks to Alain Juppe to AFP.
"Don't send girls with olive branches," Lieberman added Monday, referencing a boatload of French activists who tried to breach Israel's blockade on Gaza.
The United Nations Palmer Report on the 2010 Mavi Marmara incident concluded Israel's blockade of Gaza was both "legal and appropriate" as a means of curtailing arms to the Hamas terror organization.
Israeli officials note that the Kerem Shalom crossing to Gaza is never at full capacity despite all international aid requests being made.
French and Western criticism of Israel's arms embargo - predicated on the claim there is a 'humanitarian crisis' in Gaza - is unfounded, the officials say
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/10839#.TsF7RHIVi-U
The NGO Bill: Who is Being Undemocratic?
This bill doesn’t prevent the NGO’s from doing what they are doing. It simply aims to prevent them from being funded by outside bodies who are doing so not because they want to advance human rights but because they want to thwart Israeli policies.
From Ted Belman
The government is proposing legislation that applies to “political NGO’s”. The bill’s explanatory notes state explicitly that it is intended to deal with “organizations acting in the guise of human rights organizations that seek to influence the political discourse, character and policies of the State of Israel.”
The Bill would ban “political” non-governmental organizations from receiving donations of over NIS 20,000 from foreign governments or international organizations.
The leftist Israeli newspaper Haaretz argues,
Since they do not have any legal justification for shutting down these human rights organizations, Netanyahu and his colleagues are trying to achieve this goal via the parliamentary majority they command. As opposed to donations from unsupervised private sources, which also flow to right-wing organizations, human rights organizations receive aid from legitimate bodies like the United Nations and the European Union, which scrupulously abide by the rules of transparency.
It is not a question of whether these bodies are “legitimate” or not but rather whether their activities are. Implicit in this last sentence is the thought that “right wing organizations” are not even legitimate.
Even if there is nothing morally or legally wrong with the US administration working to unseat foreign governments including those in Israel, the question becomes is the victim country democratically bound to permit them to do so. In the past the US has contributed to the fall of a number of Israeli governments in the hope of it being replaced by a more friendly government.
Similarly, the European governments are working to thwart the will of the majority in Israel because it opposes their agenda which, for instance, is to stop settlement construction. They buttress their agenda by financially supporting Israeli NGO’s that are friendly to their agenda.
The government says their activities go far beyond protection of human rights and into the realm of affecting the political discourse. They most certainly do. It should be noted that these activities have more to do with providing the international community with evidence than they do to with changing the local discourse. Haaretz is saying that they have every right to interfere in our policy making and we do not have the democratic right to thwart their activities by denying access their money.
This Bill doesn’t prevent the NGO’s from doing what they are doing. It simply aims to prevent them from being funded by outside government and international bodies who are doing so not because they want to advance human rights but because they want to thwart Israeli policies or actions with which they disagree such as settlement construction or self defense.
These NGO’s are acting subversively to the democratically elected government.
A
The US outlaws the use of foreign funds by local candidates. Is this, too, undemocratic?
re they being democratic when they reject the will of the majority and openly align with foreign governments to thwart that will?
Furthermore we know that well financed PR campaigns can affect the will of the majority. How much more so if foreign governments added considerably to the funds available for PR including massive advertising budgets.
The US outlaws the use of foreign funds by local candidates. Is this too undemocratic? It also puts limits on what individuals or corporations can contribute to candidates.
In both cases the US is protecting democracy from foreign or undue influence and not undermining it.
Israel likewise.
Saturday, November 5, 2011
Obama's Brave New World
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/10796#.TrXET3IVi-U
Obama's "Brave New World"
The "Arab Spring" Islamist fiasco, so lauded by Obama, is taking place in the shadow of Iran's nuclear threat. And to top it all, he thinks he can silence US Jews.
From Ron Jager
Years before the Obama presidency, Tunisia was considered the best example of a moderate, pragmatic Arab country. This past week, in the first democratic elections ever held in this nation, Tunisia became an Islamic state.
In Libya, after the world watched the public lynching of deposed leader Muammar Kaddafi, his body was put on display in a supermarket freezer. Libya's new leader, Mustafa Abdul Jalil, enthusiastically supported by President Obama, declared that Sharia (Islamic law) would be the “basic source” of all legislation – meaning we should forget about democracy there as well.
Under Sharia, Allah, vis-à-vis the Koran, makes the laws, not man, and what interesting laws they are...
It’s important to understand that Obama’s "small print" and "leading from behind" approach played a significant role in facilitating Libya’s transition to an Islamic state.
Egypt, the largest Arab nation and until recently America's closest Arab ally in the Middle East, will be holding elections in November. All forecasts predict that the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood will win the elections, transforming Egypt into an Islamic state. Remember, it was Obama who abandoned President Hosni Mubarak, humiliating him in public, calling on him to resign, and allowing the Muslim Brotherhood to take over Egypt.
Under Sharia, Allah, vis-à-vis the Koran, makes the laws, not man, and what interesting laws they are...
The "Arab Spring" so warmly supported by President Obama has thrown the Arab nations of North Africa into the arms of the most radical of Islamic jihadist movements, paving the way for a renewed Islamic caliphate from the Persian Gulf to the Mediterranean Sea.
All this is taking place under the umbrella of a nuclear Iran, creating a strategic threat not only to Israel, but to America as well.
Lets assume for a moment that Obama did not support the so-called Arab Spring for ideological reasons, but erroneously created the situation simply by being a novice, that is he couldn't help himself. That would infer that the jihadist takeover of the Middle East is the direct result of the president’s lack of experience, lack of common sense and sheer incompetence. Either way, Obama comes up looking much less capable than he claims to be.
Perhaps many Americans share my disappointment; especially those who were so hopeful three years ago when then Senator Obama announced his candidacy. At the time, he spoke with seemingly earnest conviction about meeting the nation's challenges, the failure of leadership, and the chronic avoidance of tough decisions.Today, nearly three years into the Obama presidency and the “Brave New World” he helped create in this region of the world, we see Arab nations collapsing like dominoes in the Islamic takeover of the Middle East.
In the coming year, with Obama focusing on the 2012 election, I think we can expect to see little if any direct involvement by him in the Middle East. The president is reluctant to risk another confrontation with Israel and Prime Minister Netanyahu. Obama's political strategists want him to retain and even expand his base of Jewish support and not lose their votes in key states.
I believe he’ll seek to empower others, including European leaders, to do his bidding in hopes of not losing the Jewish vote in 2012. Some expect him to use European and Arab leaders to use pressure Netanyahu politically and economically, causing him to capitulate and carry out policies Obama supports. Why risk the support of American Jews in the upcoming election? Why pay a political price when European and Arab leaders don’t have a Jewish constituency to worry about. Let others carry the burden and take the heat.
This will be one of the major political challenges Israel will have to deal with this year.
Unfortunately, Obama is using a similar strategy of letting others to carry the burden of his misguided policies in American domestic politics as well. The recent Anti-Defamation League & American Jewish Committee unity pledge on Israel is only the latest example of how President Obama burdens others with politically difficult choices so as to focus attention away from himself and avoid being abandoned electorally by supporters of Israel. By convincing American Jewish organizations to avoid criticizing or challenging Obama's foreign policy approach towards Israel; he has achieved the opposite result and sparked a heated debate that will only strengthen the perception of Obama of being a genuine incompetent.
This attempt to silence those that question the Obama's administration's foreign policy towards Israel is not only unworthy of the best of America's tradition of free speech but reminds us all of the imposed silence on the Jewish community by the Democratic Party during the Holocaust.
Obama's pathetic attempt to silence Jews will not succeed. Today as opposed to the 1940's, Israel exists, empowering Jews to stand up everywhere and be heard. Gone are the days in which Jews must conform to White House dictates.
Obama's latest insult to the Jewish Community should remind us all what to expect should Obama win the re-election and be freed of electoral constraints. Obama's latest attempt to manipulate the Jewish community provides a glimpse into his "Brave New World."
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/149437#.TrWsP3IVi-U
Anti-Israel Group 'Invades' Boston Israel Consulate
Dozens of anti-Israel activists attempted to barge into the Israeli consulate in Boston over the weekend.
David Lev
Dozens of anti-Israel activists attempted to barge into the Israeli consulate in Boston over the weekend in protest over Israel's seizure of the Canadian-Irish flotilla ships that attempted to sail to Gaza. Bearing PA flags, the activists attempted to storm the building but were turned back. They swore to return, shouting slogans about how the “apartheid regime in Israel must fall.”
The activists were “spillovers” from the Occupy Boston protests, one of many Occupy Wall Street protests, some with anti- Semitic undertones, being held in the U.S. demanding social justice. At least three people have been arrested on drug charges in the protests over the past several days, and police report numerous knife fights between homeless individuals who are participating in the protests. Police also report a significant rise in vandalism in downtown Boston.
Meanwhile, six of the flotilla members who were arrested Friday were released on Saturday night. One of the detainees was an Israeli citizen, Mag'id Ca'il, an Arab from Haifa. He was interviewed by a correspondent of Iranian television who accompanied by the flotilla. In the interview, he claimed he was threatened by IDF soldiers.
Police have been arranging for the deportation of the flotilla members, but several of them told reporters Saturday night that they were refusing to leave Israel. The activists said that they preferred to remain in prison in Israel and go to court in order to make their opinions heard, than to leave voluntarily.
Obama's "Brave New World"
The "Arab Spring" Islamist fiasco, so lauded by Obama, is taking place in the shadow of Iran's nuclear threat. And to top it all, he thinks he can silence US Jews.
From Ron Jager
Years before the Obama presidency, Tunisia was considered the best example of a moderate, pragmatic Arab country. This past week, in the first democratic elections ever held in this nation, Tunisia became an Islamic state.
In Libya, after the world watched the public lynching of deposed leader Muammar Kaddafi, his body was put on display in a supermarket freezer. Libya's new leader, Mustafa Abdul Jalil, enthusiastically supported by President Obama, declared that Sharia (Islamic law) would be the “basic source” of all legislation – meaning we should forget about democracy there as well.
Under Sharia, Allah, vis-à-vis the Koran, makes the laws, not man, and what interesting laws they are...
It’s important to understand that Obama’s "small print" and "leading from behind" approach played a significant role in facilitating Libya’s transition to an Islamic state.
Egypt, the largest Arab nation and until recently America's closest Arab ally in the Middle East, will be holding elections in November. All forecasts predict that the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood will win the elections, transforming Egypt into an Islamic state. Remember, it was Obama who abandoned President Hosni Mubarak, humiliating him in public, calling on him to resign, and allowing the Muslim Brotherhood to take over Egypt.
Under Sharia, Allah, vis-à-vis the Koran, makes the laws, not man, and what interesting laws they are...
The "Arab Spring" so warmly supported by President Obama has thrown the Arab nations of North Africa into the arms of the most radical of Islamic jihadist movements, paving the way for a renewed Islamic caliphate from the Persian Gulf to the Mediterranean Sea.
All this is taking place under the umbrella of a nuclear Iran, creating a strategic threat not only to Israel, but to America as well.
Lets assume for a moment that Obama did not support the so-called Arab Spring for ideological reasons, but erroneously created the situation simply by being a novice, that is he couldn't help himself. That would infer that the jihadist takeover of the Middle East is the direct result of the president’s lack of experience, lack of common sense and sheer incompetence. Either way, Obama comes up looking much less capable than he claims to be.
Perhaps many Americans share my disappointment; especially those who were so hopeful three years ago when then Senator Obama announced his candidacy. At the time, he spoke with seemingly earnest conviction about meeting the nation's challenges, the failure of leadership, and the chronic avoidance of tough decisions.Today, nearly three years into the Obama presidency and the “Brave New World” he helped create in this region of the world, we see Arab nations collapsing like dominoes in the Islamic takeover of the Middle East.
In the coming year, with Obama focusing on the 2012 election, I think we can expect to see little if any direct involvement by him in the Middle East. The president is reluctant to risk another confrontation with Israel and Prime Minister Netanyahu. Obama's political strategists want him to retain and even expand his base of Jewish support and not lose their votes in key states.
I believe he’ll seek to empower others, including European leaders, to do his bidding in hopes of not losing the Jewish vote in 2012. Some expect him to use European and Arab leaders to use pressure Netanyahu politically and economically, causing him to capitulate and carry out policies Obama supports. Why risk the support of American Jews in the upcoming election? Why pay a political price when European and Arab leaders don’t have a Jewish constituency to worry about. Let others carry the burden and take the heat.
This will be one of the major political challenges Israel will have to deal with this year.
Unfortunately, Obama is using a similar strategy of letting others to carry the burden of his misguided policies in American domestic politics as well. The recent Anti-Defamation League & American Jewish Committee unity pledge on Israel is only the latest example of how President Obama burdens others with politically difficult choices so as to focus attention away from himself and avoid being abandoned electorally by supporters of Israel. By convincing American Jewish organizations to avoid criticizing or challenging Obama's foreign policy approach towards Israel; he has achieved the opposite result and sparked a heated debate that will only strengthen the perception of Obama of being a genuine incompetent.
This attempt to silence those that question the Obama's administration's foreign policy towards Israel is not only unworthy of the best of America's tradition of free speech but reminds us all of the imposed silence on the Jewish community by the Democratic Party during the Holocaust.
Obama's pathetic attempt to silence Jews will not succeed. Today as opposed to the 1940's, Israel exists, empowering Jews to stand up everywhere and be heard. Gone are the days in which Jews must conform to White House dictates.
Obama's latest insult to the Jewish Community should remind us all what to expect should Obama win the re-election and be freed of electoral constraints. Obama's latest attempt to manipulate the Jewish community provides a glimpse into his "Brave New World."
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/149437#.TrWsP3IVi-U
Anti-Israel Group 'Invades' Boston Israel Consulate
Dozens of anti-Israel activists attempted to barge into the Israeli consulate in Boston over the weekend.
David Lev
Dozens of anti-Israel activists attempted to barge into the Israeli consulate in Boston over the weekend in protest over Israel's seizure of the Canadian-Irish flotilla ships that attempted to sail to Gaza. Bearing PA flags, the activists attempted to storm the building but were turned back. They swore to return, shouting slogans about how the “apartheid regime in Israel must fall.”
The activists were “spillovers” from the Occupy Boston protests, one of many Occupy Wall Street protests, some with anti- Semitic undertones, being held in the U.S. demanding social justice. At least three people have been arrested on drug charges in the protests over the past several days, and police report numerous knife fights between homeless individuals who are participating in the protests. Police also report a significant rise in vandalism in downtown Boston.
Meanwhile, six of the flotilla members who were arrested Friday were released on Saturday night. One of the detainees was an Israeli citizen, Mag'id Ca'il, an Arab from Haifa. He was interviewed by a correspondent of Iranian television who accompanied by the flotilla. In the interview, he claimed he was threatened by IDF soldiers.
Police have been arranging for the deportation of the flotilla members, but several of them told reporters Saturday night that they were refusing to leave Israel. The activists said that they preferred to remain in prison in Israel and go to court in order to make their opinions heard, than to leave voluntarily.
Friday, November 4, 2011
Israel to Boycott UNESCO
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/10792#.TrQlfHIVi-U
Mr. Netanyahu, Let's Boycott UNESCO
UNESCO has a long history of Jew-hatred. It will only get worse. They have long range plans and Israel must make them irrelevant.
From Giulio Meotti
After halting its annual fees to the UN's cultural agency, the State of Israel should suspend any cooperation with UNESCO.
The United Nations’ body just simply decided to give the Palestinians full membership and that's quite enough.
Jerusalem will not risk any isolation, since it’s already a pariah in the UN and the word “Jew” has become, once again, an accepted insult in the global square.
UNESCO’s next steps are under Israel’s nose: very soon the Temple Mount, the Dead Sea Scrolls, Joseph’s Tomb, Rachel’s Tomb, the Shalom al Israel synagogue and the Cave of the Patriarchs will be designated as “mosques” by the UN’s agency.
Israel's passive policy helped the Palestinians win the UNESCO race and allowed the “rewriting the history of Palestine”, as Hamdan Taha, director of the Palestinian Antiquities Department, explained last summer.
If Israel will continue to ignore this horrible blood libel, there are no chances to stop the Islamic revisionism supported by the West (France just voted for the Palestinians at UNESCO). All Islamic nations will soon band together again to work against the Jewish people at the UN.
After leaving UNESCO, the State of Israel should also set up a campaign of public diplomacy to explain how the United Nations became a corrupted and anti-Semitic forum and a tool of the Islamic bloc against the Jewish people.
The precedent of a similar boycott of Israel is the International Court of Justice in The Hague.
The very idea of Israeli hopes of UNESCO’s good faith was inane, especially given the organization’s long record of anti-Jewish hatred. UNESCO’s intifada goes back to November 20, 1974, when under Arab pressure, UNESCO voted to exclude Israel from any regional group.
During the 90’s, then-UNESCO director-general Frederico Mayor boycotted all the international conferences in Jerusalem and UNESCO’s officials always refused to meet with Israeli officials.
In 2005, when the United Nations celebrated its 50th anniversary, UNESCO refused to include the Holocaust in its World War II resolution, intentionally ignoring Israel’s request to include a reference to the destruction of European Jewry.
In July 2000, Yasser Arafat insisted to Bill Clinton at Camp David that “no Jewish temple ever existed”. This blood libel will become UNESCO’s next mantra. Just think about what PA cleric Sheikh Taissir Tamimi said about the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron: “It’s a pure mosque, which Jewish presence defiles”.
Slapping history squarely in the face, last year UNESCO adopted Tamimi’s propaganda and declared that Rachel’s Tomb and Hebron’s Cave are “Muslim mosques”.
In 2009 UNESCO designated Jerusalem as the “capital of Arab culture”, a false claim now finding fertile ground even outside the Islamic world. The Dutch government, through UNESCO, just donated 300,000 euros to the Palestinian Authority, meant to finance excavations near Joseph’s Tomb, fourth on thelist of Judaism’s holiest sites.
Last year, the UNESCO report on science forcibly converted to Islam the Jewish physician Maimonides, calling him “Moussa ben Maimoun”.
Through the UNESCO membership, the Palestinians are trying to put together a case to take Israel to the International Court of Justice to condemn the Israeli excavations in Jerusalem as “war crimes and crimes against humanity”. This is the most severe calumny that was directly connected to the deaths of dozens of Israelis and Palestinians during the so-called “Western Wall Tunnel riots” of 1995.
In recent years, UNESCO increased its collaboration with ISESCO, the cultural body of the Organization of the Islamic Conference. Ever since the Wakf accelerated its wholesale destruction of artifacts on the Temple Mount back in 1996, when it surreptitiously built a new mosque in Solomon’s Stables, UNESCO has remained remarkably silent, not once condemning the Palestinian Authority for its desecration of the site.
Indeed, UNESCO does not even recognize Israel’s sovereignty over Jerusalem. The organization has called for financial sanctions against Israel, passed hundreds of resolutions demonizing Israel’s activities in Judea and Samaria and denounced Israel’s efforts to restore holy sites in Jerusalem. By gratifying UNESCO, Israel will only boost the Palestinian cultural Intifada.
Last year, the UNESCO report on science forcibly converted to Islam the Jewish physician Maimonides, calling him “Moussa ben Maimoun”.
This is an historical battle that Israel can win with the support of Westerners who still care about the fate of their civilization.
But the Jews have to stop playing according their enemies’ guillotine.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/149421#.TrQmYXIVi-U
Flotilla Activists 'Won't Resist IDF'
Organizers for a two-ship mini-flotilla headed towards Gaza say activists have vowed not to resist IDF commandos sent to intercept them.
Gavriel Queenann
Activists aboard two vessels seeking to violate Israel's blockade of Hamas in Gaza say they won't resist Israeli naval forces when boarded.
"The two ships are close to Israel's waters and their crew has been instructed not to resist naval forces who will attempt to stop them," Denis Kosseim told AFP. "Our representatives have signed a document where they pledged not to resist in case Israeli forces board the ship. We hope they will be able to return unharmed."
A failed flotilla of 17 planned vessels that ended with a single French vessel striking out towards Gaza in July ended without incident when Israeli naval commandoes boarded the vessel and redirected it to the port of Ashdod.
The latest flotilla consists of one Canadian ship called Tahrir and an Irish yacht. On board the vessels are 27 activists, crewmen and journalists, including one Iranian reporter.
Organizers say the ships carry $30,000 worth of medical equipment for the people of Gaza.
However, Israeli defense officials say if the purpose of the flotilla were aid rather than a media spectacle and provocation the supplies carried could easily be unloaded in Ashdod and shipped by ground to Gaza.
The Kerem Shalom crossing connecting Israel to Gaza has remained open despite rocket fire and is never at full capacity despite all aid requests from Gaza being met.
The amount of aid carried by the ships, they say, is negligible in light of the hundreds trucks per day that enter Gaza from Israel.
During Ramadan imams in Gaza sought to collect surplus aid from local residents to repackage and send to Somalia.
Earlier this year the UN Palmer commission concluded Israel’s blockade of Gaza was a “legal and appropriate” method of preventing the flow of arms to the Hamas terror organization.
Mr. Netanyahu, Let's Boycott UNESCO
UNESCO has a long history of Jew-hatred. It will only get worse. They have long range plans and Israel must make them irrelevant.
From Giulio Meotti
After halting its annual fees to the UN's cultural agency, the State of Israel should suspend any cooperation with UNESCO.
The United Nations’ body just simply decided to give the Palestinians full membership and that's quite enough.
Jerusalem will not risk any isolation, since it’s already a pariah in the UN and the word “Jew” has become, once again, an accepted insult in the global square.
UNESCO’s next steps are under Israel’s nose: very soon the Temple Mount, the Dead Sea Scrolls, Joseph’s Tomb, Rachel’s Tomb, the Shalom al Israel synagogue and the Cave of the Patriarchs will be designated as “mosques” by the UN’s agency.
Israel's passive policy helped the Palestinians win the UNESCO race and allowed the “rewriting the history of Palestine”, as Hamdan Taha, director of the Palestinian Antiquities Department, explained last summer.
If Israel will continue to ignore this horrible blood libel, there are no chances to stop the Islamic revisionism supported by the West (France just voted for the Palestinians at UNESCO). All Islamic nations will soon band together again to work against the Jewish people at the UN.
After leaving UNESCO, the State of Israel should also set up a campaign of public diplomacy to explain how the United Nations became a corrupted and anti-Semitic forum and a tool of the Islamic bloc against the Jewish people.
The precedent of a similar boycott of Israel is the International Court of Justice in The Hague.
The very idea of Israeli hopes of UNESCO’s good faith was inane, especially given the organization’s long record of anti-Jewish hatred. UNESCO’s intifada goes back to November 20, 1974, when under Arab pressure, UNESCO voted to exclude Israel from any regional group.
During the 90’s, then-UNESCO director-general Frederico Mayor boycotted all the international conferences in Jerusalem and UNESCO’s officials always refused to meet with Israeli officials.
In 2005, when the United Nations celebrated its 50th anniversary, UNESCO refused to include the Holocaust in its World War II resolution, intentionally ignoring Israel’s request to include a reference to the destruction of European Jewry.
In July 2000, Yasser Arafat insisted to Bill Clinton at Camp David that “no Jewish temple ever existed”. This blood libel will become UNESCO’s next mantra. Just think about what PA cleric Sheikh Taissir Tamimi said about the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron: “It’s a pure mosque, which Jewish presence defiles”.
Slapping history squarely in the face, last year UNESCO adopted Tamimi’s propaganda and declared that Rachel’s Tomb and Hebron’s Cave are “Muslim mosques”.
In 2009 UNESCO designated Jerusalem as the “capital of Arab culture”, a false claim now finding fertile ground even outside the Islamic world. The Dutch government, through UNESCO, just donated 300,000 euros to the Palestinian Authority, meant to finance excavations near Joseph’s Tomb, fourth on thelist of Judaism’s holiest sites.
Last year, the UNESCO report on science forcibly converted to Islam the Jewish physician Maimonides, calling him “Moussa ben Maimoun”.
Through the UNESCO membership, the Palestinians are trying to put together a case to take Israel to the International Court of Justice to condemn the Israeli excavations in Jerusalem as “war crimes and crimes against humanity”. This is the most severe calumny that was directly connected to the deaths of dozens of Israelis and Palestinians during the so-called “Western Wall Tunnel riots” of 1995.
In recent years, UNESCO increased its collaboration with ISESCO, the cultural body of the Organization of the Islamic Conference. Ever since the Wakf accelerated its wholesale destruction of artifacts on the Temple Mount back in 1996, when it surreptitiously built a new mosque in Solomon’s Stables, UNESCO has remained remarkably silent, not once condemning the Palestinian Authority for its desecration of the site.
Indeed, UNESCO does not even recognize Israel’s sovereignty over Jerusalem. The organization has called for financial sanctions against Israel, passed hundreds of resolutions demonizing Israel’s activities in Judea and Samaria and denounced Israel’s efforts to restore holy sites in Jerusalem. By gratifying UNESCO, Israel will only boost the Palestinian cultural Intifada.
Last year, the UNESCO report on science forcibly converted to Islam the Jewish physician Maimonides, calling him “Moussa ben Maimoun”.
This is an historical battle that Israel can win with the support of Westerners who still care about the fate of their civilization.
But the Jews have to stop playing according their enemies’ guillotine.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/149421#.TrQmYXIVi-U
Flotilla Activists 'Won't Resist IDF'
Organizers for a two-ship mini-flotilla headed towards Gaza say activists have vowed not to resist IDF commandos sent to intercept them.
Gavriel Queenann
Activists aboard two vessels seeking to violate Israel's blockade of Hamas in Gaza say they won't resist Israeli naval forces when boarded.
"The two ships are close to Israel's waters and their crew has been instructed not to resist naval forces who will attempt to stop them," Denis Kosseim told AFP. "Our representatives have signed a document where they pledged not to resist in case Israeli forces board the ship. We hope they will be able to return unharmed."
A failed flotilla of 17 planned vessels that ended with a single French vessel striking out towards Gaza in July ended without incident when Israeli naval commandoes boarded the vessel and redirected it to the port of Ashdod.
The latest flotilla consists of one Canadian ship called Tahrir and an Irish yacht. On board the vessels are 27 activists, crewmen and journalists, including one Iranian reporter.
Organizers say the ships carry $30,000 worth of medical equipment for the people of Gaza.
However, Israeli defense officials say if the purpose of the flotilla were aid rather than a media spectacle and provocation the supplies carried could easily be unloaded in Ashdod and shipped by ground to Gaza.
The Kerem Shalom crossing connecting Israel to Gaza has remained open despite rocket fire and is never at full capacity despite all aid requests from Gaza being met.
The amount of aid carried by the ships, they say, is negligible in light of the hundreds trucks per day that enter Gaza from Israel.
During Ramadan imams in Gaza sought to collect surplus aid from local residents to repackage and send to Somalia.
Earlier this year the UN Palmer commission concluded Israel’s blockade of Gaza was a “legal and appropriate” method of preventing the flow of arms to the Hamas terror organization.
Thursday, November 3, 2011
Ban Against PA UN Membership
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/149385#.TrL3BHIVi-U
Ban Speaks Out: Tells PA Not to Seek UN Membership
In a surprising reversal, UN Secretary General Ban ki-Moon said that the PA should not seek to be recognized as a member state of the UN.
David Lev
In a surprising movel, U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said Thursday that the Palestinian Authority should not pursue its plan to be recognized as a member state of the United Nations. Now that the PA has been accepted into UNESCO, the Authority's leadership should be satisfied with that achievement. Anything beyond that, Ban said, will “not be beneficial for Palestine and not be beneficial for anybody.”
Ban, speaking before a meeting of the G20 industrialized nations in Paris, specified the reason for his outspoken remarks; the financial hit the U.N. took when UNESCO approved the PA's membership. The U.S. and Canada have cut off funds to the organization, instantly lowering its operating budget by nearly 30%.
No other countries have stepped up to fill in the financial gap – and Ban, the observers said, has gotten an unpleasant reminder of how important the United States is to the international organization. The U.S. had been set to forward $64 million to UNESCO next month, but that money will no longer be forthcoming, as a result of Washington's cutoff of funds.
On Thursday, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said that Israel would also halt its contributions to UNESCO. Israel had funded the international organization with about $2 million annually.
Ban said that any further efforts by the PA to ensconce itself in U.N. organizations as a vehicle to achieve international recognition of the state it seeks to establish in Judea, Samaria, and most of Jerusalem, “could impact the lives of millions of people, who will no longer receive funding for their needs and will suffer because of the actions of the Palestinians.”
Several days ago, a spokesperson for the PA, praising UNESCO for accepting the Authority's bid to join the organization, said that the PA intended to join an additional 16 organizations.
Among the groups where the PA plans to file for membership are the World Health Organization, the World Trade Organization, the International Telecommunications Union, and a host of others. If the PA does apply and is accepted – a very likely scenario, since the Authority is practically guaranteed all the votes of the third world and developing countries that make up the vast majority of these groups – the U.S. has said that it will halt funding for them as well.
Ban Speaks Out: Tells PA Not to Seek UN Membership
In a surprising reversal, UN Secretary General Ban ki-Moon said that the PA should not seek to be recognized as a member state of the UN.
David Lev
In a surprising movel, U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said Thursday that the Palestinian Authority should not pursue its plan to be recognized as a member state of the United Nations. Now that the PA has been accepted into UNESCO, the Authority's leadership should be satisfied with that achievement. Anything beyond that, Ban said, will “not be beneficial for Palestine and not be beneficial for anybody.”
Ban, speaking before a meeting of the G20 industrialized nations in Paris, specified the reason for his outspoken remarks; the financial hit the U.N. took when UNESCO approved the PA's membership. The U.S. and Canada have cut off funds to the organization, instantly lowering its operating budget by nearly 30%.
No other countries have stepped up to fill in the financial gap – and Ban, the observers said, has gotten an unpleasant reminder of how important the United States is to the international organization. The U.S. had been set to forward $64 million to UNESCO next month, but that money will no longer be forthcoming, as a result of Washington's cutoff of funds.
On Thursday, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said that Israel would also halt its contributions to UNESCO. Israel had funded the international organization with about $2 million annually.
Ban said that any further efforts by the PA to ensconce itself in U.N. organizations as a vehicle to achieve international recognition of the state it seeks to establish in Judea, Samaria, and most of Jerusalem, “could impact the lives of millions of people, who will no longer receive funding for their needs and will suffer because of the actions of the Palestinians.”
Several days ago, a spokesperson for the PA, praising UNESCO for accepting the Authority's bid to join the organization, said that the PA intended to join an additional 16 organizations.
Among the groups where the PA plans to file for membership are the World Health Organization, the World Trade Organization, the International Telecommunications Union, and a host of others. If the PA does apply and is accepted – a very likely scenario, since the Authority is practically guaranteed all the votes of the third world and developing countries that make up the vast majority of these groups – the U.S. has said that it will halt funding for them as well.
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
Wither, the useless Quartet?
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/10770#.TrCD0nIVi-U
Whither the Useless Quartet?
It does not matter what the Quartet says about "peace" or a so-called two state solution. The Quartet has proven since its establishment in 2002 and its so-called Roadmap for Peace a year later that it is a completely useless and ineffectual body.
From Yonatan Silverman
The international Quartet is a political body comprised of the US, Russia, the European Union and the UN whose purpose is to encourage and coordinate peace negotiations between the Palestinians and Israel.
Since its founding in 2002 the Quartet has launched a number of initiatives and made numerous statements regarding its positions on Palestinian/Israeli negotiations for peace. The Quartet even predicted the establishment of a Palestinian state by September 2011.
What has this august group of nations achieved in nine years? What achievements can it point to? What exactly is the Quartet’s track record?
The group was established in Madrid in 2002 by then Spanish Prime Minister Aznar, as a result of the escalating conflict in the Middle East, Former British PM Tony Blair is the Quartet's current Special Envoy.
The events of the Second Intifada in Israel motivated the creation of the Quartet. Launching the Intifada was Yasser Arafat’s tactic for addressing the collapse of the Oslo peace negotiations at Camp David in the summer of 2000. Arafat has been roundly indicted for the tragic failure of these talks, but he reacted with a wave of brutal terrorism nonetheless. The year 2002 represents a peak in the terrorist violence in Israel and Israel’s determined counter-reaction.
The suicide attack on March 27, 2002. at the Passover seder in Netanya's Park Hotel, was the straw that broke the camel's back.
IDF Operation Defensive Shield was launched two days later on March 29, and continued intensively through April 21.
The Quartet’s Roadmap was a guide for Israeli funeral processions and not a productive diplomatic undertaking for peace by any means.
A reserve force of 30,000 was called up and they occupied the major cities of the West Bank, including Tulkarm, Jenin, Nablus, Ramallah, Qalqilya, and Bethlehem.
In response to this bitter war for survival Israel was forced to fight against Islamic terrorism, the Quartet proposed an even handed “Roadmap for Peace”.
“ On April 30, 2003, following the swift collapse of Saddam Hussein's regime in Baghdad, the Bush administration released the latest plan for Israeli-Palestinian peace, a document entitled "A Performance-Based Roadmap to a Permanent Two-State Solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. The declared destination of the "roadmap" was "a final and comprehensive settlement of the Israel-Palestinian conflict by 2005.”
“In the summer of 2000, the government of Israel and the Palestinian leadership seemed to be on the brink of consummating a final agreement for partition and peace. However, once again the Palestinian refusal to legitimize Israel led to an eleventh-hour rejection of partition and the launching of a new war, the so-called Al-Aqsa intifada.”
The year 2003 was another ugly scenario in Israel with suicide bombings from the Islamic terrorists against innocent civilians and other murderous attacks. Peace was nowhere in sight. Israel was under brutal attack from vicious Palestinian terrorists.
The 2003 Quartet road map comprised three goal-driven phases with the ultimate goal of ending the conflict as early as 2005.
With all due respect to the merit of proposing a peace program for Israel and the Palestinians something critical is missing from the Quartet’s proposal.
“The roadmap is yet one more effort to engineer a two-state solution, another attempt to achieve, by diplomacy, what has yet to be achieved by history: Palestinian acceptance of Israel.”
It should come as no surprise that the state of Israel rejected the Quartet Road Map.
On May 12, 2003 it was reported that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon had rejected Israel's main road map requirement, a settlement freeze, as "impossible" due to the need for settlers to build new houses and start families.
On May 25, 2003 the Israeli government announced fourteen prerequisites before acceptance of any peace platform.
The first step on the road map was the appointment of the first-ever Palestinian Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas (also known as Abu Mazen,) by Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. The United States and Israel demanded that Arafat be neutralized or sidelined in the road map process, claiming that he had not done enough to stop Palestinian attacks against Israelis while in charge.
The United States refused to release the road map until a Palestinian prime minister was in place. Abbas was appointed on March 19, 2003, clearing the way for the release of the road map's details on April 30, 2003.
The Prime Minister's Cabinet then approved the road map with 14 reservations.
President Bush visited the Middle East from June 2–4, 2003 for two summits in an attempt to push the road map as part of a seven-day overseas trip through Europe and Russia.
After Bush left the region, the Palestinians launched a series of terror attacks against Israelis. This threatened to derail the road map plan. On June 15 Israeli forces entered Gaza killing a Palestinian. In the following few days, Israel continued its targeting of Hamas leaders with new helicopter attacks.
Clearly, the Quartet’s Roadmap was a guide for Israeli funeral processions and not a productive diplomatic undertaking for peace by any means.
In November 2003, the United Nations Security Council endorsed the road map in Resolution 1515 which called for an end to all violence including "terrorism, provocation, incitement and destruction". But the requirements of Phase I of the road map were not fulfilled, and the road map was discontinued. It is thus currently effectively in limbo.
In November 2004, Yasser Arafat died at age 75 in a French hospital. Arafat's powers were divided among his officials, with Mahmoud Abbas elected head of the Palestine Liberation Organization and Rawhi Fattuh sworn in as acting president of the Palestinian Authority.
In August 2005, the Israelis started their planned disengagement from the Gaza Strip, removing all of its settlements from this area and from a portion of the West Bank. This was widely endorsed around the world and the process, although unilateral on Israel's part, was coordinated with the Palestinian Authority.
In early January 2006, Sharon suffered a major stroke and did not awaken from a deep coma. With Sharon in serious condition in hospital, his powers were transferred to his deputy, Finance Minister Ehud Olmert.. On March 28, Knesset elections were held, and Olmert's party, Kadima, won the most seats. On April 14, 2006 Sharon was declared permanently disabled, and Olmert was named interim Prime Minister, becoming Prime Minister on May 4.
It was Prime Mininster Olmert who oversaw the disastrous Israeli disengagement from the Gaza perimeter communities. This was a tremendous political and social tragedy on every plane. And the country is still licking its wounds from this six years later
The Quartet for its part however reacted positively.
Kofi Annan, UN Secretary General, commented on August 18, 2005 on what he called Israeli Prime Minister Sharon’s "courageous decision" to carry through with the painful process of disengagement. And what rewards did Israel receive following the bold disengagement from the Gaza perimeter communities? Over the next two years the Hamas Islamic terror gang which controls Gaza fired thousands of lethal rockets at Israel’s southern communities, particularly Sderot.
Israel began planning for a military operation as early as six months before the invasion of Gaza by collecting critical intelligence on potential targets. Defense minister Ehud Barak stated that the offensive was the result of Israel’s "patience running out" over the rocket attacks According to Israeli officials, its subsequent December 27 offensive took Hamas by surprise, thereby increasing terrorist casualties. This was the launch of Operation Cast Lead, which lasted a few weeks and did its job. Hamas halted its massive launching of lethal rockets into Israeli territory. Although they continue to launch rockets and mortars at Israel and IDF forces from time to time.
The Quartet issued no statement on Operation Cast Lead.
The United Nations reaction to Operation Cast Lead was the Goldstone Report however.
The Quartet never issued a statement pro or con about the malicious deceitful Goldstone Report either.
What about Annapolis?
The Annapolis Conference was a Middle East peace conference held on November 27, 2007, at the US Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland, USA. The conference marked the first time a two-state solution was articulated as the mutually agreed-upon outline for addressing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The conference ended with the issuing of a joint statement from all parties.
Needless to say, no positive results whatsoever came out of the vaunted Annapolis Conference.
There is no record of a Quartet statement on Israel’s 2006 Second Lebanon War, but this is perhaps because it was a Lebanese not a Palestinian issue.
But the nonexistence of a Quartet statement on the Second Lebanon War is immaterial. It does not matter one bit what the Quartet says about issues concerning Israeli Palestinian peace or a so-called two state solution. The Quartet has proven since its establishment in 2002 and the launch of the so-called Roadmap for Peace a year later that it is a completely useless and ineffectual body.
And its idea of establishing a Palestinian state in the UN is comparable to a woman who believes she can give birth in one month following conception. This is not likely to happen in this or any universe. The only state the Palestinians will achieve through the auspices of the UN is a state of mind.
Whither the Useless Quartet?
It does not matter what the Quartet says about "peace" or a so-called two state solution. The Quartet has proven since its establishment in 2002 and its so-called Roadmap for Peace a year later that it is a completely useless and ineffectual body.
From Yonatan Silverman
The international Quartet is a political body comprised of the US, Russia, the European Union and the UN whose purpose is to encourage and coordinate peace negotiations between the Palestinians and Israel.
Since its founding in 2002 the Quartet has launched a number of initiatives and made numerous statements regarding its positions on Palestinian/Israeli negotiations for peace. The Quartet even predicted the establishment of a Palestinian state by September 2011.
What has this august group of nations achieved in nine years? What achievements can it point to? What exactly is the Quartet’s track record?
The group was established in Madrid in 2002 by then Spanish Prime Minister Aznar, as a result of the escalating conflict in the Middle East, Former British PM Tony Blair is the Quartet's current Special Envoy.
The events of the Second Intifada in Israel motivated the creation of the Quartet. Launching the Intifada was Yasser Arafat’s tactic for addressing the collapse of the Oslo peace negotiations at Camp David in the summer of 2000. Arafat has been roundly indicted for the tragic failure of these talks, but he reacted with a wave of brutal terrorism nonetheless. The year 2002 represents a peak in the terrorist violence in Israel and Israel’s determined counter-reaction.
The suicide attack on March 27, 2002. at the Passover seder in Netanya's Park Hotel, was the straw that broke the camel's back.
IDF Operation Defensive Shield was launched two days later on March 29, and continued intensively through April 21.
The Quartet’s Roadmap was a guide for Israeli funeral processions and not a productive diplomatic undertaking for peace by any means.
A reserve force of 30,000 was called up and they occupied the major cities of the West Bank, including Tulkarm, Jenin, Nablus, Ramallah, Qalqilya, and Bethlehem.
In response to this bitter war for survival Israel was forced to fight against Islamic terrorism, the Quartet proposed an even handed “Roadmap for Peace”.
“ On April 30, 2003, following the swift collapse of Saddam Hussein's regime in Baghdad, the Bush administration released the latest plan for Israeli-Palestinian peace, a document entitled "A Performance-Based Roadmap to a Permanent Two-State Solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. The declared destination of the "roadmap" was "a final and comprehensive settlement of the Israel-Palestinian conflict by 2005.”
“In the summer of 2000, the government of Israel and the Palestinian leadership seemed to be on the brink of consummating a final agreement for partition and peace. However, once again the Palestinian refusal to legitimize Israel led to an eleventh-hour rejection of partition and the launching of a new war, the so-called Al-Aqsa intifada.”
The year 2003 was another ugly scenario in Israel with suicide bombings from the Islamic terrorists against innocent civilians and other murderous attacks. Peace was nowhere in sight. Israel was under brutal attack from vicious Palestinian terrorists.
The 2003 Quartet road map comprised three goal-driven phases with the ultimate goal of ending the conflict as early as 2005.
With all due respect to the merit of proposing a peace program for Israel and the Palestinians something critical is missing from the Quartet’s proposal.
“The roadmap is yet one more effort to engineer a two-state solution, another attempt to achieve, by diplomacy, what has yet to be achieved by history: Palestinian acceptance of Israel.”
It should come as no surprise that the state of Israel rejected the Quartet Road Map.
On May 12, 2003 it was reported that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon had rejected Israel's main road map requirement, a settlement freeze, as "impossible" due to the need for settlers to build new houses and start families.
On May 25, 2003 the Israeli government announced fourteen prerequisites before acceptance of any peace platform.
The first step on the road map was the appointment of the first-ever Palestinian Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas (also known as Abu Mazen,) by Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. The United States and Israel demanded that Arafat be neutralized or sidelined in the road map process, claiming that he had not done enough to stop Palestinian attacks against Israelis while in charge.
The United States refused to release the road map until a Palestinian prime minister was in place. Abbas was appointed on March 19, 2003, clearing the way for the release of the road map's details on April 30, 2003.
The Prime Minister's Cabinet then approved the road map with 14 reservations.
President Bush visited the Middle East from June 2–4, 2003 for two summits in an attempt to push the road map as part of a seven-day overseas trip through Europe and Russia.
After Bush left the region, the Palestinians launched a series of terror attacks against Israelis. This threatened to derail the road map plan. On June 15 Israeli forces entered Gaza killing a Palestinian. In the following few days, Israel continued its targeting of Hamas leaders with new helicopter attacks.
Clearly, the Quartet’s Roadmap was a guide for Israeli funeral processions and not a productive diplomatic undertaking for peace by any means.
In November 2003, the United Nations Security Council endorsed the road map in Resolution 1515 which called for an end to all violence including "terrorism, provocation, incitement and destruction". But the requirements of Phase I of the road map were not fulfilled, and the road map was discontinued. It is thus currently effectively in limbo.
In November 2004, Yasser Arafat died at age 75 in a French hospital. Arafat's powers were divided among his officials, with Mahmoud Abbas elected head of the Palestine Liberation Organization and Rawhi Fattuh sworn in as acting president of the Palestinian Authority.
In August 2005, the Israelis started their planned disengagement from the Gaza Strip, removing all of its settlements from this area and from a portion of the West Bank. This was widely endorsed around the world and the process, although unilateral on Israel's part, was coordinated with the Palestinian Authority.
In early January 2006, Sharon suffered a major stroke and did not awaken from a deep coma. With Sharon in serious condition in hospital, his powers were transferred to his deputy, Finance Minister Ehud Olmert.. On March 28, Knesset elections were held, and Olmert's party, Kadima, won the most seats. On April 14, 2006 Sharon was declared permanently disabled, and Olmert was named interim Prime Minister, becoming Prime Minister on May 4.
It was Prime Mininster Olmert who oversaw the disastrous Israeli disengagement from the Gaza perimeter communities. This was a tremendous political and social tragedy on every plane. And the country is still licking its wounds from this six years later
The Quartet for its part however reacted positively.
Kofi Annan, UN Secretary General, commented on August 18, 2005 on what he called Israeli Prime Minister Sharon’s "courageous decision" to carry through with the painful process of disengagement. And what rewards did Israel receive following the bold disengagement from the Gaza perimeter communities? Over the next two years the Hamas Islamic terror gang which controls Gaza fired thousands of lethal rockets at Israel’s southern communities, particularly Sderot.
Israel began planning for a military operation as early as six months before the invasion of Gaza by collecting critical intelligence on potential targets. Defense minister Ehud Barak stated that the offensive was the result of Israel’s "patience running out" over the rocket attacks According to Israeli officials, its subsequent December 27 offensive took Hamas by surprise, thereby increasing terrorist casualties. This was the launch of Operation Cast Lead, which lasted a few weeks and did its job. Hamas halted its massive launching of lethal rockets into Israeli territory. Although they continue to launch rockets and mortars at Israel and IDF forces from time to time.
The Quartet issued no statement on Operation Cast Lead.
The United Nations reaction to Operation Cast Lead was the Goldstone Report however.
The Quartet never issued a statement pro or con about the malicious deceitful Goldstone Report either.
What about Annapolis?
The Annapolis Conference was a Middle East peace conference held on November 27, 2007, at the US Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland, USA. The conference marked the first time a two-state solution was articulated as the mutually agreed-upon outline for addressing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The conference ended with the issuing of a joint statement from all parties.
Needless to say, no positive results whatsoever came out of the vaunted Annapolis Conference.
There is no record of a Quartet statement on Israel’s 2006 Second Lebanon War, but this is perhaps because it was a Lebanese not a Palestinian issue.
But the nonexistence of a Quartet statement on the Second Lebanon War is immaterial. It does not matter one bit what the Quartet says about issues concerning Israeli Palestinian peace or a so-called two state solution. The Quartet has proven since its establishment in 2002 and the launch of the so-called Roadmap for Peace a year later that it is a completely useless and ineffectual body.
And its idea of establishing a Palestinian state in the UN is comparable to a woman who believes she can give birth in one month following conception. This is not likely to happen in this or any universe. The only state the Palestinians will achieve through the auspices of the UN is a state of mind.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)