The XIIIth Point of Pres. Wilson’s Fourteen Points stipulated “An independent Polish state which should include the territories inhabited by indisputably Polish population, which should be assured a free and secure access to the sea, and whose political and economic independence and territorial integrity should be guaranteed by international covenant.” There was no Point stipulating an independent Jewish state even though Balfour’s declaration of 1917 proclaimed a homeland for Jews in Palestine. Accordingly, on August 28, 1919, the American “King-Crane Commission” presented its report and recommendations to the allies on the status of Syria, Iraq, and Palestine. This commission had been delegated by the Paris Conference to study the situation there. The Commission, noting that, “a national home for the Jewish people is not equivalent to making Palestine into a Jewish state,” recommended that, “…Jewish immigration should be definitely limited, and that the project for making Palestine distinctly a Jewish commonwealth should be given up.” (see G. Antonius, The Arab Awakening. London, 1938) p. 448, 450) The report recommended the creation of a single Arab state – “Greater Syria” – that included Lebanon and Palestine and would have been administered under American mandatory power (“Palestine” at the time also included the area that became Jordan in 1921). G. Antonius wrote the British White Paper of 1939 (see, below)
In a response published in the wake of the UN 1947 resolution to split Palestine in half, the Syrian Social Nationalist Party (a counterpart of the NSDAP) declared in the spirit of the American King-Crane Commission:
“Neither Britain, the Soviet Union, America; nor, indeed, Egypt or Arabia has any title to determine Palestine’s future. The whole General Assembly of the United Nations can have no right to impose on the Syrian nation resolutions that divest the Syrian national sovereignty over its homeland or its right over its own territory. The whole General Assembly of the United Nation can have no right to intentionally abrogate the right of free nations to determine their destinies by themselves.”
Let's take a look behind the historical base of this U.S. Insistence on the Greater Syria policy. First of all it was in the spirit of 19th century anti-Semitic paradigm and the deep infatuation with Aryan supremacy as reflected in the propaganda of the then great powers (Gobineau, Renan, Lord Cronmer). The name Syria is derived from the Aryan sun god Syria (Surya) and reflects deep historical hostility between Jewish earth-centered religion and the pagan solar tradition revived in the Renaissance era by Catholic cleric Copernicus. The name 'Christianity” first appeared in Syria and went hand in hand with the Syrian pseudo-apostle Marcion who aimed at detaching of Christianity from its Jewish roots and founding it in the perennial Aryan, solar tradition. This fact is well reflected in the term 'church' which was embraced as the common designation of the new religious community.
Church vs. Synagogue
Let me dwell on that: Sar (circle, saros) is the Babylonian god of the sky. He is also Assaros or Asshur (the son of Shem), and Zero -- Zero-ana, the chakkra, or wheel, boundless time. Archeology tells us that circles of stones long antedate the time frame of Joshua, Exodus, and the Canaanites. It is quite likely that the circles came down through Canaanite tradition playing a role in Sun-worship. The Bible follows Israel’s 12 memorial stones from the temporarily dry bed of the Jordan (Josh 4:19) to a place called Gilgal and then loses track of them forever. The word ‘gilgal’ means ‘a circle of stone’, and throughout Europe and the Mideast, circles of large stones have been found dating back a “quarter million years or more”. The most famous stone circle is Stonehenge. Stonehenge well corresponds to Diodorus’s description of a “magnificent temple of Apollo” which he locates “in the center of Britain.” It is a circular enclosure,” he says, “adorned with votive offerings and tablets with Greek inscriptions suspended by travelers upon the walls.
According to Webster’s New World Dictionary of the American Language, Second College Edition, the word church has the following etymology: Church n. (ME. Chirche, kirke-/ OE. Cirice (& ON. Kirkja,-/ OE), Gmc. *kirikia, LGr. (Ec.) *Kyrike, Gr. Kyriake (oikia), Lord’s (house), kuriakos, belonging to the Lord-/kyrios, ruler-/kyros, supreme power. The extensive reference work shows that the root of the word is circe.
Dr. E. L. Bullinger, in Appendix 186 of his Companion Bible, adds this meaning to the word circe: “Compare Hebrew kikkar (a circle), a circuit or disc.” Undoubtedly the relationship he sought to establish was that the word circe in Anglo-Saxon, or Old English, Greek, and Hebrew, pointed toward ancient pagan sun worship. Consequently, it is obvious that the Lord meant the sun and that “the Lord’s house” (church) was the location where the sun was worshiped. The Greek word used in the New Testament to identify the Body of Christ is ekklesia—'the called out' or assembly. The Greek word for 'circle' is never used in the New Testament.
“And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” -Mt 16:18
The English word church has no etymological relationship to the Greek ekklesia. The word ekklesia does not refer to a building; rather, it specifies a group of called out believers. It was used to translate the Hebrew word qahal in the Old Testament. The word qahal means a group of called out believers. Probably from this word came out the English word call.
In Dt 23, the Hebrew term Qahal Yahweh (assembly of Yahweh) is found six times. It is translated congregation in the King James version. The Greek Septuagint translated it ekklesia. We must conclude that the True Worshipers, who composed the ancient congregation of Israel, bore the name Assembly of Yahweh. Israel was the people of the True Mighty One. They were the assembly in the wilderness, Acts 7:38. They were called by his name – Yahweh (2 Chron 7:14)
The apostolic assembly, described in the New Testament, also comprises a modern-day extension of the worship of ancient Israel. In the Old Testament, the True Worshipers were known as the Assembly of Yahweh. Dt chapter 23 makes that quite plain, where in six instances the term qahal Yahweh is used. The True Worshipers are called by the name of the father: “For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Master Yahshua Messiah, of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named,” (Eph 3:14-15) They bear the same name that the True Worshipers of Israel bore in the Old Testament. The fledgling assembly did not build a huge, lavish edifice in which to worship. We read in Romans 16:5 and 1 Cor 16:19 that the assembly comprised a group of people meeting in the home of one of the faithful. We observe a similar situation in the modern-day Assemblies of Yahweh. Services are frequently held in the homes of members.
(Monarchy (Le roi Soleil), Aristocracy and Catholicism, declared Taine, were the historic influences that had shaped the French nation. It was a nation, he warned, that was now being seriously debilitated by dangerous notions of democracy.) Democracy is rooted in the Biblical practice of religion, not in Greek philosophy.
The following quotation form A. Hitler’s Mein Kampf explains why the British upper classes admired the Führer and were helping him financially: “…The Jewish doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle of Nature and replaces the eternal privilege of power and strength by the mass of numbers and their dead weight. Thus it denies the value of personality in man, contests the significance of nationality and race, and thereby withdraws from humanity the premise of its existence and its culture. As a foundation of the universe, this doctrine would bring about the end of any order intellectually conceivable to man. And as, in thus greatest of all recognizable organism, the result of an application of such a law could only be chaos, on earth it could only be destruction for the inhabitants of this planet.” Eternal in this case means hereditary, like the seats in the British Upper House.
Wilson's policy of Greater Syria was a logical outcome of the Holy Alliance established in 1820. On the 16th of August 1820, the Congregation of the Holy Office reported that Settele, the professor of astronomy at Rome and Washington might teach the Copernican system as truth established. This meant promotion of T.Paine’s anti-Semitism based on his admiration for philosophical heliocentrism and contempt for “barbarity” of Jewish Biblical culture. Quite recently Pope John Paul II recognized evolutionary hypothesis also as truth established.
In 1933 this Alliance was consolidated when Father Lemaitre during his seminars in California proclaimed what came to be known as Big Bang hypothesis derived from the story of the Indian Upanishads. Abbe Lemaitre imagined the entire universe as resulting from the radioactive decay of a single super-atom. In the course of time this “primeval atom theory” evolved into its present form which says that some 15 billion years ago an incredibly compact pellet of matter exploded to launch its components on a voyage that still continues. In Hindu religious tradition puru (a point, or pellet) means god.
Big Bang theory also referred to as Modern “Genesis” retired the Biblical Genesis because the American social Darwinist and a New Ager John Fiske imparted to the enthusiastic audiences his conviction that the political genius of Aryan peoples was the hope of the world.
The Aftermath of the British White Paper of 1939
In May 1939 came the British White Paper renouncing the Balfour Declaration and the mandate on which British authority rested. The White Paper was prepared by George Antonius’s, The Arab Awakening: The Story of the Arab National Movement (Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1939) The British imperialism in the Middle East was justified in such words: “There seems to be no valid reason why Palestine should not be constituted into an independent Arab state in which as many Jews as the country can hold without prejudice to its political and economic freedom would live in peace, security and dignity, and enjoy full rights of citizenship. Such an Arab state would naturally be tied to Great Britain by a freely-negotiated treaty which should contain provisions for the safeguarding of British strategic and economic interest. It would secure Great Britain's interests on a firm basis of consent. And it would restore Palestine to its proper place, as a symbol of peace in the hearts of Judaism, Christianity and Islam.” Let's see how this humane policy was contradicted by the Darwinian conquest red in tooth and claw. This document inspires nowadays the “right of return” of “Palestinian refugees” to Israel. Not to Jordan, which is a part of Palestine mandate.
America no more interested in combating anti-Semitism
During a recent appearance sponsored by the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the Harvard Law School professor A. Dershowitz asked American Jews “to undertake an aggressive information offensive if they are to prevent a dangerous wave of worldwide Antisemitism from infecting the minds of the next generation of US leaders. Dershowitz said the “megaphone effect for anti-Israel, anti-Zionist speech” on campuses like Harvard is so pervasive that even many Jewish professors with tenure have been afraid to speak out against it. Recently, he got a call from a professor who whispered to him, “Thanks for speaking up.” Dershowitz said the call from this academic, who urged the attorney not to identify him as a supporter of Israel, is nothing out of the ordinary. “(The situation at universities) has become so bad,” Dershowitz lamented, “that a Jewish student told me he was afraid to speak up for Israel because if he is perceived as a Zionist, he won’t be able to get dates.” Dershowitz called France “the lavatory of Antisemitism.” – “God cursed those who are the sons of Israel…Those people, God made monkeys and pigs.” (Sami Al-Arian; Fired from tenured position at University of South Florida). What bitter fruits will this hate ripen into?
(Israelnationalnews.com) The Obama administration has created and appointed upwards of 40 "czars". But there is one appointment he has not made - an omission that speaks volumes.
But there is one appointment Obama has failed to make. The Jerusalem Post reported: "The Obama administration has failed to name an envoy for monitoring and combating anti-Semitism around the world, as mandated by US law, since the previous ambassador was relieved of his duties at the start of the president's term more than six months ago, officials said Thursday."
Rafael Medoff, director of the Washington DC-based David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies, explained: "Foot-dragging on the selection sends a message that anti-Semitism¹ is not of great importance to the United States."
The Jewish Riff-Raff don't deserve the privilege of Human Rights
The famous Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek in his article The Pope’s Failures (In These Times, April 8, 2005) observed: “Although the modern topic of human rights is ultimately grounded in the Jewish notion of the love for one’s neighbor we tend to establish today a negative link between the Decalogue (the traumatically imposed divine Commandments) and human rights. That is to say, within our post-political, liberal-permissive society, human rights have, ultimately, become the rights to disobey the Ten Commandments. “The right to privacy” – the right to adultery, done in secrecy, where no one has the right to probe. “The right to pursue happiness and private property” – the right to steal and exploit others. “Freedom of expression and freedom of the press” – the right to lie. “The right of free citizens to bear weapons” (cp. those Palestinian terrorists always with their shotguns, shooting into air without a cause) – the right to kill. And ultimately, “freedom of religious belief” – the right to worship false gods. In the minds of some Europeans (of Voltaire, for example, the Jews were relics of a barbarous and obscurantist past, and as such were unworthy of the rights of free men.
Washington, D.C. (August 4, 2009) -- The Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) today spoke out strongly against President Obama's decision to award Mary Robinson the Presidential Medal of Freedom. The President will honor 16 people with the Medal of Freedom on August 12.
RJC responded to the late Friday afternoon statement by the White House spokesman Tommy Vietor, who said, "Mary Robinson has dedicated her career to human rights... As with any public figure, we don't necessarily agree with every statement she has ever made, but it's clear that she has been an agent of change and a fighter for good."
Why Do they Hate FM Lieberman?
The commander of the Home Army, Gen. Stefan Rowecki, in a well-known dispatch to the government-in-exile in London dated September 25, 1941, framed the issue as follows:
I report that all decisions and declarations of the Government (in London) and members of the National Council about Jews in Poland evoke the worst possible impression in the country. They really facilitate unfriendly, indeed inimical, anti government propaganda. This applies to the “Day of the Jews” (Dzien Zydostwa, an official seminar held in London and attended by members of the government and the National Council), to the speech by Schwarzbart (a moderate Zionist who was a Jewish representative on the National Council), to the nomination of Lieberman (a well-known lawyer, a Pole of Jewish origin appointed minister of justice in London), and to the official greetings (published and broadcast over the radio to occupied Poland) on the occasion of the Jewish New Year.
(Israelnationalnews.com) As police announced plans to indict him for bribery, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said he has no regrets. “I am at peace with everything that I have done. If I had the chance to do things over, I would do it all the same way,” he said, in a meeting of the Constitution, Law and Justice committee.
Lieberman expressed no concern over the possibility that he will be indicted. On the contrary, the Yisrael Beiteinu (Israel Our Home) head said he was happy. “I am glad that after many efforts, and the Supreme Court petition I filed, the investigation has finally reached a conclusion,” he said. Earlier this year Lieberman filed a court case against police for allegedly dragging out an investigation into his affairs for more than a decade (sic!).
One Nation under Big Bang
“At the same period there was coming into existence that speculative Ionian philosophy to which the world owes the origin of free thought and critical philosophy. As professor Bury has said, ‘Our deepest gratitude is due to the Greeks as the originators of liberty of thought and discussion. Ionia in Asia Minor was the cradle of free speculation. The history of European science and European philosophy begins in Ionia. Here in the 6th and 5th centuries B.C. the earliest philosophers by using their reason sought to penetrate into the origin and structure of the world. They began the work of destroying orthodox views and religious faiths’ (Encyclopedia Americana, ed. 1954, entry History).
Greek Philosophy as a model of free thought?Give me a break! Plutarch writes that, the heliocentric hypothesis of Aristarchus of Samos was proved (apodeiknumi) by a certain Seleukos of Seleukia (Seleucos prins opinion d’affermer la terre veritablement autour des poles se mouuoir non le ciel – Rabelais, Pantagruel, Book V, ch. 25 (1552). The Greek verb ‘apodeiknumi’ used by Plutarch is cognate with the theological concept of dogma. Statements of speculative philosophy (‘knowledge of good and evil’) were termed by Latin writers decreta, scita, placita, axiomata, enunciata, effata. Cicero replaced all these terms by one: dogmata. Inquisition was not an invention of Catholic Church; already Plato wanted to defend his dogmas with the help of such an institution. This encyclopedia explains the neo-Nazi atmosphere prevailing on the U.S. Campuses.
The idea of liberty held by modern liberals is quite new. According to them, liberty connotes a radical individualism that rejects all social norms and institutions which the individual has not agreed to. Subscribers to this idea defend the right of Nazis (who themselves despise the idea of rights) to march through Skokie, Illinois, but not the right of Skokians and their elected leaders to maintain order and defend the dignity of the principles and customs they hold most dear. Likewise, they support the right of homosexuals and atheists to invade and destroy the Boy Scouts. (The Pink Swastika)
The Greek Philosophy teaches that the destinies of people are governed by racial law. Imperialism was responsible for the rise of modern racism. Imperialism gave dignity and importance to racism at the end of the 19th century and body and substance to the psychotic theories of the German racists. In the minds of Boer, British, and Belgian colonial officials the black natives of Africa or the disease-ridden fellahin of Egypt were subtly but surely downgraded from human beings into a species of quasi-humans. (ib.)
The Minds shaped by Ionian Philosophy
Excerpts from The Pink Swastika
This “Greek ideal” was a culture of pederastic male supremacy. Male homosexuality, especially between men and boys, was considered a virtue in Hellenic (Greek) society. In several of his Dialogues, Plato serves as an apologist for pederasty, and apparently considered man/boy sex to be superior to heterosexual relations. As author Eva Cantarella notes in Bisexuality in the Ancient World, “Plato makes clear in the Symposium that it was perfectly acceptable to court a lad, and admirable to win him...Pederasty did not lurk in the shadows of Greek life, it was out in the open” (Greenberg:148, 151). Cantarella reviews the literature of the period, including Plato’s writings. She writes that Plato developed a theory “of the existence of two different types of love: the love inspired by the heavenly Aphrodite, and the love inspired by the common Aphrodite.” Only “pederastic courtship,” notes Cantarella, reflected the “heavenly” form of love (Cantarella:59). In his Symposium, Plato expounds this theory:
[Homosexual] boys and lads are the best of their generation, because they are the most manly. Some people say they are shameless, but they are wrong. It is not shamelessness which inspires their behavior, but high spirit and manliness and virility, which leads them to welcome the society of their own kind. A striking proof of this is that such boys alone, when they reach maturity engage in public life. When they grow to be men, they become lovers of boys, and it requires the compulsion of convention to overcome their natural disinclination to marriage and procreation; they are quite content to live with one another unwed (ibid.:60).
Voltaire may have had both of these men in mind when he once remarked of the propensity of classical philosophers, “Once, a philosopher, twice, a sodomite!” (Grant, 1993:28). To be fair, however, the characterizations of Plato and Socrates as pederasts is hotly contested by many historians.
It is relevant to point out that this time period in the Roman empire can be considered the Christians’ Holocaust. In 64 A.D. Christians were blamed by Nero for the burning of Rome and were targeted for extermination. Many Christians suffered unimaginable tortures as entertainment for the sadistic homosexual emperors of Rome. Though Rome was less homosexually-oriented than Greece, Roman society was nevertheless heavily influenced by homosexual practices. In Homosexuality, the Torah and Grace, Dwight Pryor reports that 14 of the first 15 Roman emperors were homosexual (tape one). In The Construction of Homosexuality, historian David F. Greenberg writes that “Roman homosexual tastes were so taken for granted that when Antony asked Herod to send his younger brother-in-law Aristobulus to the Roman court, Herod refused because ‘he did not think it safe to send him...to the principal man of the Romans, that would abuse him in his amours’” (Greenberg:154f). While there are many differences between the treatment of Christians in Pagan Rome and Jews in Nazi Germany, the prominence of homosexuality among the chief perpetrators of both atrocities cannot be ignored.
No comments:
Post a Comment